HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

Archijerej

Registered User
Jan 17, 2005
8,565
8,214
Poland
The Lindstrom camp provided all the results, imaging etc for team medical staffs to look at.
The problem is not that someone is trying to hide information.

As far as I understand the very nature of herniated disc issues is that they are unpredictable, so no positive report today can be considered a guarantee for the future.

When you're picking 5th OA, that's a major problem.
 

FormerLurker

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 11, 2003
1,263
2,085
Mississauga
Habs need a gamebreaker more than anything else.

Pop quiz children: what's the last year the habs managed to draft a player who finished the season top 10 in points (while still on the habs)?

Answer: 19effin79 (Mats Naslund...who only did it once)

No more galaxybraining picks kids: if Demidov is available, you take him.
Why so condescending?
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,166
70,856
I don't understand why Lindstrom's ranking would increase if he provided all the teams with the information that it was indeed a herniated disk and not just some insignificant injury it was made out to be at first.
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,166
70,856
I actually think they'd take him over Demidov. I think they consider him a better bet to succeed in the playoffs. This is just my opinion of course, but they clearly value bigger and stronger players. I actually wonder if they might not have Iginla above Demidov, but probably not.
Passing up on Michkov AND Demidov would be a very Habs thing to do, but I don't see Iginla being favored over Sennecke. Leonard is pretty much exactly what you want from a top 6 forward in the playoffs (arguably a more desirable style than Iginla) and we still passed on him. Not to say that Reinbacher isn't a desirable player for the playoffs, but I think he, like Sennecke, brings a uniqueness in addition to style compared to others that the Habs management prefers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrb1p and Andrei79

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,822
58,919
Citizen of the world
Passing up on Michkov AND Demidov would be a very Habs thing to do, but I don't see Iginla being favored over Sennecke. Leonard is pretty much exactly what you want from a top 6 forward in the playoffs (arguably a more desirable style than Iginla) and we still passed on him. Not to say that Reinbacher isn't a desirable player for the playoffs, but I think he, like Sennecke, brings a uniqueness in addition to style compared to others that the Habs management prefers.
This playoffs thing needs to f***ign die already man. Good players are good players, there's no "playoffs" archetype.
 

Genghis Keon

Registered User
Apr 1, 2002
936
150
Visit site
The problem is not that someone is trying to hide information.

As far as I understand the very nature of herniated disc issues is that they are unpredictable, so no positive report today can be considered a guarantee for the future.

When you're picking 5th OA, that's a major problem.
I would imagine medical staffs know all this, so presumably the team that picks him will have ranked him high enough above their next rated player that they believe he's worth the risk (whatever their medical staffs determine the risks to be), whether at 2nd overall or 20th. He may or may not prove to be worth the risk or the right choice, but there's no way teams aren't aware of the issues (more aware than we are because they have the full reports and presumably access to the player) and there's no way they're not including the information into their decision making process.

At some point he's worth the risk. Who knows what that point is? There seem to be a tonne of good options at 5, so if Lindstrom is the pick, you have to assume that the medical staff has determined that the risks are minimal or the scouts like/love him enough to make management take the risk. I think we can always second guess the scouts, but it would be pretty arrogant to second guess the medical staff based on incomplete information (a two word diagnosis vs medical reports and potentially physicals with team doctors).
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,166
70,856
This playoffs thing needs to f***ign die already man. Good players are good players, there's no "playoffs" archetype.
I do think there is some truth to it, but it shouldn't be all you look at. I mean you'd think Brendan Gallagher's style would work in the playoffs but he was dog shit in the playoffs. That being said, having a bunch of soft purely perimeter players won't really get you anywhere.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,162
56,410
Do we know why Columbus is dead set at getting a forward at #4?
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,162
56,410
Sources? I taught they were high on Silayev.
Why would you even think that? Every serious mock draft and expert that covered the combine have them interested in Lindstrom or Sennecke. Their fanbase is also certain that they are going with a forward, some even switched from Lindstrom to Iginla after yesterday's herniated disc news.
 

HabsCode

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
3,304
3,927
Why would you even think that? Every serious mock draft and expert that covered the combine have them interested in Lindstrom or Sennecke.
Post draft lottery there was talk that Anton Silayev has said in an interview that Columbus and Utah has showed the most interest in him in speaking with every team.
Their fanbase is also certain they are going with a forward.
Surely that must mean something.:dunce:
 
Last edited:

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,166
70,856
Do we know why Columbus is dead set at getting a forward at #4?
Werenski/Jiricek/Mateychuk/Severson will be there for a very long time so there's really no room in that top 4. Only reason for them to go with a dman is if they trade Mateychuk for a forward, but that forward might not be better than the forward that will be available to them at 4 in this draft.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,659
10,646
Nova Scotia
Why would you even think that? Every serious mock draft and expert that covered the combine have them interested in Lindstrom or Sennecke. Their fanbase is also certain that they are going with a forward, some even switched from Lindstrom to Iginla after yesterday's herniated disc news.
They had high interested in Ignila for few months
 
  • Like
Reactions: Balthazar

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,162
56,410
Surely that must mean something.:dunce:
This kind of comment always makes me laugh.

Yes, yes it does mean something. No outsider knows better than the hardcore fanbase what their team needs are. It's true for the Habs and it's also true for the Jackets.
 

Team_Spirit

95% Elliotte
Jul 3, 2002
39,696
21,890
Gahd damn.

That's three whole mfers.
1NDhvsH.png

Going for 4?

This guy Hague told the media the hardest question was from the Habs *would you rat your teammate breaking cewrfew*

Easy no you dummy.

Another one to the DND.

1000004947.jpg
 

B1g B1rd

Habs Best Def of all times
May 21, 2018
215
304
Trade that 5th + Xhekaj for Buffalo's 11th + Peterka...
Pick the BPA at 11th... It'll be a good player
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad