MarkovsKnee
Global Moderator
I think no one believe in our chance winning it
Because it would be a massive game changer
@WeThreeKings tried the super positive thing last year for Bedard draft. It didn't work. I prefer to not think about.
I think no one believe in our chance winning it
Because it would be a massive game changer
Chicago will end up with both.
Bettmans loves high end duos ,I hope we win #1 and CBJ wins #2 so that f***ing loser ass Chicago can pick 4.
I hope we win #1 and CBJ wins #2 so that f***ing loser ass Chicago can pick 4.
If the lottery was rigged...let me tell you..Bettman would have never let the best player in the last 20 years ( Mcdavid) going to the North pole of Canada...Edmonton.Bettmans loves high end duos ,
Malkin - Crosby
Hischer-Hughes
Drai-Macdavid
If the lottery was rigged...let me tell you..Bettman would have never let the best player in the last 20 years ( Mcdavid) going to the North pole of Canada...Edmonton.
In fact , the worst case scenario for the league was Mcdavid to Edmonton or Winnipeg..
I wonder at 5 if we try to trade up?
The way things are going, he's going #1 and Celebrini will fall to five.Can Iggs Jr fall to five?
Can Iggs Jr fall to five?
Yup. And if we're honest, Lindstrom isn't the star a few of the people on this board have made him out to be.If this Lindstrom back injury is serious, we need to be super cautious if we are in a position to pick him. We are already an injury prone team, especially with a guy like Dach who we can't count on playing 70+ games most seasons. It could be a Vilardi situation where you get a good player for maximum 60 games a year.
Fall? You mean rise?
Don't think people are labeling him as a star, but his athleticism, size, and goalscoring are very enticing if he's healthy.Yup. And if we're honest, Lindstrom isn't the star a few of the people on this board have made him out to be.
You seriously have to offer Guhle or Caufield and the 1st to move up into top 5.I wonder at 5 if we try to trade up?
Yeah, i'm all aboard the Iggy train, but this is getting a little out of hand. I can see him going anywhere from 6-12 at the moment. In my rankings, I have him at 6 or 7 with him and Catton being interchangeable (and Lindstrom being healthy) for now and that's because i love him as a player. I can see teams having him at 8, 9 or 10. I compare him to a bit of Jack Quinn type prospect (with a better motor) except Quinn was one of the oldest players in his draft class and Iginla is one of the youngest in his which is pretty damn impressive.
Its not getting out of hand, people are just catching up.Yeah, i'm all aboard the Iggy train, but this is getting a little out of hand. I can see him going anywhere from 6-12 at the moment. In my rankings, I have him at 6 or 7 with him and Catton being interchangeable (and Lindstrom being healthy) for now and that's because i love him as a player. I can see teams having him at 8, 9 or 10. I compare him to a bit of Jack Quinn type prospect (with a better motor) except Quinn was one of the oldest players in his draft class and Iginla is one of the youngest in his which is pretty damn impressive.
People were talking of him as a slam dunk #2 OA and a pretty certain 1C. He's the third best player on his team right now, maybe fourth if you want to put Wiesblatt over him.Don't think people are labeling him as a star, but his athleticism, size, and goalscoring are very enticing if he's healthy.
And once again prove that tanking takes effort and commitment to bare to the bone a team and live with it.Chicago will end up with both.
Hughes literally said that they would like a forward but won’t hesitate to take their top defenceman if it falls that way.4 forwards are unlikely to go before us, and there’s no way you know “for sure.”
Yes I absolutely would. Love Iginla and I like Catton, but Levshunov is a special defenceman. He’s far better than Mailloux.you would take Levshunov over Catton or Iginla ?
And once again prove that tanking takes effort and commitment to bare to the bone a team and live with it.
If it has a pulse, trade it.
I hate them.
1C is a reach, but something along the goalscoring version of Byfield isn't entirely crazy to think about. I mean McKenna is just ridiculous so it's not even fair for Lindstrom. Overagers aren't really a fair comparison either, looking at Andrei Svechnikov, Luchuk and Sokolov (when he joined) were better players. Doesn't really mean anything.People were talking of him as a slam dunk #2 OA and a pretty certain 1C. He's the third best player on his team right now, maybe fourth if you want to put Wiesblatt over him.
The physical package is undeniable, though.
Which doesn’t mean at all they will “for sure” take a d-man under your scenario.Hughes literally said that they would like a forward but won’t hesitate to take their top defenceman if it falls that way.
Yes I absolutely would. Love Iginla and I like Catton, but Levshunov is a special defenceman. He’s far better than Mailloux.