SlafySZN
Registered User
- May 21, 2022
- 7,600
- 16,494
This guy will also be taken higher than expected
Wouldn’t be surprised at all. I’m kinda shocked everytime i see him around 16-17 in lists. I think he goes higher.
This guy will also be taken higher than expected
It's funny, last year we spent the year dreaming of winning the lottery and getting Bedard, this year everyone just seems resigned to picking in the 5-8 range and there's not a ton of Celebrini talk. Obviously Celebrini is not Bedard, but damn he would be a complete gamechanger for us.If we win the lottery we won’t have to worry about all of this
I'm gonna throw a hot take out and say Iginla does go higher. Not sure if that would be my choice, but GM's will love his overall package.Who gets drafted first, Catton or Iginla?
This guy will also be taken higher than expected
I'm gonna throw a hot take out and say Iginla does go higher. Not sure if that would be my choice, but GM's will love his overall package.
Who you talking to? You talking to me?! You want some of this?!!This is the Habs board...we do get offended fairly easily....
Just that I do against the consensus right now. I have maybe a bigger love than I should with Iginla. Just my type of player. I have some doubts about Lindstrom that makes me not pick him as high as most do. Just like I have with Silyaev who will be a NHL'er...just not sure he'll be 2-way as I wish a top 5 player would be.
Frankly though, this is the type of year that while I do have an insane love for Iginla, if for the Habs we end up picking Eiserman...I'll be fine. I'll be fine with a lot of players right now. Might even be fine with Chernyskhov albeit the russian factor.
It matters.Brandsegg-Nygard is only two months younger than Bedard (and three months younger than Dvorsky and not even 1 month younger than Juraj Pekarcik from a 2023 draft)
Not that it matters just a fun fact..
Celebrini would be awesone with this core!! Can't stop dreaming about this top6!It's funny, last year we spent the year dreaming of winning the lottery and getting Bedard, this year everyone just seems resigned to picking in the 5-8 range and there's not a ton of Celebrini talk. Obviously Celebrini is not Bedard, but damn he would be a complete gamechanger for us.
The only thing I don’t like is that he’s a real early birthday. But I thought he was great in the WJC considering the supporting cast he had. He’s basically a Norwegian Ryan Leonard who a lot of people wanted last season.His hype has died down through the season but he's still one of my favorite prospects. he would fit like a glove in our top 6 and the way the Habs want to play. Probably be a little more comfortable picking him a couple slots lower than where we will end up though.
Yeah but he also said that Dylan Strome would be a better NHL player than McDavid.The low opinion of McCagg comes from when he was a poster here. Interacting with others was not his strong suit.
Nearly every list I've seen(not including this thread) has had him sitting outside the top 10 as well. I'm convinced it's the PTSD from passing on Tkachuk and people are somewhat over valuing him because of that.Pronman also said most scouts he talked to didn't have Iginla in their top 10.
It's really only until we get to the combine where real sense of where people are and aren't becomes a bit more predictable but still not an exact science.
Imagine, he actually worked for the Habs and made a career out of his hockey opinions for ~30 years and he had to fight against constant trolls and cringey dunk attempts because he rightfully thought Michael McLeod was a good prospectThe low opinion of McCagg comes from when he was a poster here. Interacting with others was not his strong suit.
Not surprising at all.Everyone’s favourite scout, Grant McCagg, said a lot of scouts he’s talked to don’t even have Catton in their Top 10.
Now it’s Grant, so take it as it is, an old curmudgeon who likes to be grumpy for the sake of it. But I do see Catton lower on NHL lists, like Benson last year, Nazar the year before, etc. Just the way these GMs work.
I'm curious to know opinions on Iginla vs Ryan Leonard.
Leonard was obviously more hyped up earlier, but I wouldn't be surprised if Iginla becomes consensus top 10 down the line.
McCagg still talk to NHL scouts around hockey rinks.Everyone’s favourite scout, Grant McCagg, said a lot of scouts he’s talked to don’t even have Catton in their Top 10.
Now it’s Grant, so take it as it is, an old curmudgeon who likes to be grumpy for the sake of it. But I do see Catton lower on NHL lists, like Benson last year, Nazar the year before, etc. Just the way these GMs work.
McCagg seems close to Hughes though. Ie Slaf pick. I take it when Hughes drafting for need he may go size also. By way McCagg talks. First I heard of Surin though. Maybe trade down pick him? Similar to Nashville offer last year. Askarov, 15,24 for 5?Everyone’s favourite scout, Grant McCagg, said a lot of scouts he’s talked to don’t even have Catton in their Top 10.
Now it’s Grant, so take it as it is, an old curmudgeon who likes to be grumpy for the sake of it. But I do see Catton lower on NHL lists, like Benson last year, Nazar the year before, etc. Just the way these GMs work.
Brandsegg-Nygard is only two months younger than Bedard (and three months younger than Dvorsky and not even 1 month younger than Juraj Pekarcik from a 2023 draft)
Not that it matters just a fun fact..
We sometimes automatically assume that there is a one year difference between two drafts when in reality sometimes it can be just a weeks.
If the Habs draft 2nd, I can almost guaranty you that Lindstrom will be the pick, like 90% chance.The best news is that 6-12 range this year look very very solid to me. They have high potential.
The lottery day will be very important, Habs can draft #1, #2 aswell. If they draft in that range, we talk about Celebrini at 1. Demidov or Lindstrom at 2. (Demidov will likely be the pick, but Lindstrom profile is too good to pass, so that will be a great pick no matter what).
But in 6-12 range, will still talk about 1st line and top pairing D potential. A lot of high talent in that spot.