OT: 2024 HF Hawks Prospect Vote #1

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

#1 Prospect

  • Oliver Moore

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sam Rinzel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Roman Kantserov

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ryan Greene

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lukas Reichel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Wyatt Kaiser

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Gavin Hayes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Marek Vanacker

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Paul Ludwinski

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nick Lardis

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nolan Allan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Adam Gajan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Drew Commesso

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Isaak Phillips

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    110

TheFridge

Registered User
Mar 20, 2022
1,622
1,698
Unless Reichel has a disastrous camp, he won’t be starting the year in the AHL.

Korchinski is very likely to be in the AHL. They’re going to course-correct that mistake.

I have no problem with both guys being on this list. Neither has established themselves as NHL players and they’re both 22 or younger.
 

TheFridge

Registered User
Mar 20, 2022
1,622
1,698
Literally the only logic that need be applied to this discussion about eligibility is:

1. Are the players in question bonafide NHLers? Yes or no.
2. Are they young enough to have room for improvement? Yes or no.

I think a fair age cutoff is 23 prior to the season starting.
 

Pertti

Registered User
Dec 1, 2019
708
241
I think that cut of should be are they allowed in Calder voting.

No need to make new since Lev is winning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muffinalt

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
30,514
19,142
I think that cut of should be are they allowed in Calder voting.

No need to make new since Lev is winning.
Agreed, Lev already ran away with Number 1, just leave Korchinski, Reichel, Kaiser and Phillips off going forward.
 

ello

Registered User
Jun 12, 2018
1,060
1,364
I agree, Calder eligibility makes too much sense to not be the guidelines to follow
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bubba88

Dr Salt

Bedard saved me
Feb 26, 2019
1,730
963
ym
Just rename this to best u23 players and slap Bedard and Vlasic on as the 1-2.
 

TheFridge

Registered User
Mar 20, 2022
1,622
1,698
I think that cut of should be are they allowed in Calder voting.

No need to make new since Lev is winning.

So Vlasic shouldn’t have been considered a prospect last year, nor should Reichel have been? Despite the fact that both hadn’t shown they were NHLers heading into last offseason?
 

Malaka

you know, **** it, let’s just not think so much
Mar 3, 2020
1,891
1,677
www.youtube.com
Nazar I think has a higher ceiling than lev.

Fight me.

1720001649633.gif
 
Last edited:

Section88

Kaner? I hardly know her
Jul 11, 2017
5,614
4,847
Voted Nazar. Definitely didnt think it would be this lopsided for Levshunov. Personally don't consider Korchinski a prospect after playing a full season in the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Malaka

BobbyJet

The accountability era?
Oct 27, 2010
30,153
10,062
Dundas, Ontario. Can
Well lets get this thing going. I am at work and I am bored. Lets start. I am going to leave off Bedard because thats obvious. Everyone else is fair game in my opinion. Even Reichel, he's still developing.

I was between Nazar and Levshunov. Voted Levshunov.
As I said last season, these types of polls need a timeline. Are we looking at 1yr, 3 yrs, 5yrs, 7 yrs? I doubt very much that a poll for 1 yr would resemble a poll for 5 yrs..... and since 5 yrs is probably what we're realistically looking at,,,,, it's a crap shoot at best. Hope I'm wrong and in 3 yrs, Hawks will be a playoff team (at the worst and a SC semi-contender at best).
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
20,734
17,299
Bomoseen, Vermont
As I said last season, these types of polls need a timeline. Are we looking at 1yr, 3 yrs, 5yrs, 7 yrs? I doubt very much that a poll for 1 yr would resemble a poll for 5 yrs..... and since 5 yrs is probably what we're realistically looking at,,,,, it's a crap shoot at best. Hope I'm wrong and in 3 yrs, Hawks will be a playoff team (at the worst and a SC semi-contender at best).
We vote every year.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad