He's in his D+2, played 76 games and could be in the AHL this year. I think he's still a prospect.We are considering Korchinski and Reichel as prospects?? Reichel I was like maybe..but Korchinski? He played the entire year with the Hawks...
I have always viewed it as Calder eligible for a prospect. Neither are....He's in his D+2, played 76 games and could be in the AHL this year. I think he's still a prospect.
I can change if other people agree.I have always viewed it as Calder eligible for a prospect. Neither are....
Jaycob Megna, with a sincerest of apologies, says keep him on the list.I can change if other people agree.
I don't think Korchinski surviving 76 games on a garbage team gives a true picture of what he is, so to me he is still a prospect. I think in general the rules shouldn't be as arbitrary, so the Calder has defined rules, but giving nuance to it, I still think he qualifies for this specific vote.
I know from past ones they always have to be Calder eligible which is why I didn't include either in our overall pool. If people think they should be included that's fine, no issue there, we just need to be consistent with it.I can change if other people agree.
I don't think Korchinski surviving 76 games on a garbage team gives a true picture of what he is, so to me he is still a prospect. I think in general the rules shouldn't be as arbitrary, so the Calder has defined rules, but giving nuance to it, I still think he qualifies for this specific vote.
For our purposes, a prospect is defined as a player who has 25 or fewer regular season games played during the last NHL season, or 50 or fewer career NHL regular season games played – not the same as Calder Trophy requirements.... The age cutoff is 26 years old, as of September 15th.
Which is different from Wheeler's. When Reichel was sent back to Rockford, he included him on his final list for the season.I think the "Pronman" Criteria is generally what gets used for the sake of a uniform definition. So Korchinski, Reichel, Kaiser wouldn't apply.
That never happenedAn argument to keep KK on the list is the only reason he was in the NHL last year was because he had maxed out his development in the CHL.
Yeah, I think Number 2 is the big issue with Wheeler's criteria. He admits it's arbitrary and hence it removes objectivity and produces weird outcomes that lead to issues as a useful measure, like Benson = Prospect, Bedard = No Prospect.Which is different from Wheeler's. When Reichel was sent back to Rockford, he included him on his final list for the season.
![]()
2024 NHL prospect pool rankings: Scott Wheeler's annual countdown
Scott Wheeler's annual deep dive into every NHL team's collection of prospects.www.nytimes.com
Criteria
To be eligible for inclusion, a skater must:
- Be under 23 years old. We know that by the time a player turns 23, he is largely done with the steep upward progression we see in prospects and will begin to plateau.
- Not be a full-time NHL player. This is the arbitrary section of the criteria. Here, I trust my judgment for whether or not a rostered NHL player is still likely to bounce between levels more than I trust any pre-determined games played cutoff. Preference for inclusion as an NHL prospect is more likely to be given to teenagers than 22-year-olds.
- Either be signed to an NHL contract or selected in the entry draft, without the expiration of either of those rights. Players who are signed to AHL contracts are not considered.
Is Korchinski an absolute lock for the roster this year?Korchinski and Reichel shouldn't be on this list.
My vote is for Levshunov.
If I were handicapping, I'd say about 90-95 % to start the season in the NHL. He has an inside track having spent an entire season up, and the avoidance of the appearance of regression/demotion which could frustrate the player. Even though Kaiser and Del Mastro are older, they are more in the status quo in terms of starting in the AHL and having to come up when the opportunity presents itself. Another reason I hate the CHL Transfer Agreement and would have preferred him going back to Juniors given that it does exist.Is Korchinski an absolute lock for the roster this year?
Nope.Is Korchinski an absolute lock for the roster this year?
I mean I would say the odds are definitely in his favor but there are like 4 LD that could feasibly take that spot and I would say he is in the lead but Kaiser, EDM are right there with him. He's got the inside track, but I wouldn't call it a lock.If I were handicapping, I'd say about 90-95 % to start the season in the NHL. He has an inside track having spent an entire season up, and the avoidance of the appearance of regression/demotion which could frustrate the player. Even though Kaiser and Del Mastro are older, they are more in the status quo in terms of starting in the AHL and having to come up when the opportunity presents itself. Another reason I hate the CHL Transfer Agreement and would have preferred him going back to Juniors given that it does exist.