Clam Jensen
Registered User
Great deal for Winnipeg
I hope they enjoy watching rockets miss the net lol.
Great deal for Winnipeg
Meh, he was pretty unimpressive for us and them. He can do a job on a 3rd pair, that's about it.
He had some of the strongest underlyings and by far the best actual goal differential. He’s a great bottom pair guy and 1.5 for that is nothing.
Good player, according to scientists and leading expertsEveryone plays well with them
Because what if Mercer doesn't rebound? I care more about capable C depth, but that'd be my argument.So then why do we need to sign a top-6 forward when anyone will do?
I think the issue is giving term to any of these remaining guys, Rico included, could become a major mistake.
If we can't find a trade partner, that forward spot might just need to wait until the trade deadline.
Meh, he was pretty unimpressive for us and them. He can do a job on a 3rd pair, that's about it.
Was Palat who we got after reportedly trying for Johnny G.?Offering Rico or tarasenko multiple years after missing on marchessault sounds like another palat mistake
So then why do we need to sign a top-6 forward when anyone will do?
YesWas Palat after we were reportedly trying for Johnny G.?
And he got paid like that, so it's a good deal for them
Because what if Mercer doesn't rebound? I care more about capable C depth, but that'd be my argument.
Oh sure. But losing Dillon and re-signing ho-hum Miller has to be a bit of a let down for Jets fans.
Colton would be a strong add, but Colorado does not overpay and Colton would not come cheap. Maybe they like Hameenaho or Filmon a lot?There were some rumblings but who knows if it was true or not. His NTC kicked in today. But NJ would be a spot he wouldn’t object to I’d imagine.
Colton would be a strong add, but Colorado does not overpay and Colton would not come cheap. Maybe they like Hameenaho or Filmon a lot?
I wouldn't trade Silayev, Casey, Gritsyuk or Yegorov given the state of the prospect pool, but I'd be willing to package in and two or three other guys for Colton, easy.
Colorado's prospect pool is not good. I'd rank them:
1 C Ritchie
2 LD Gulyayev
3 G Nabokov
4 RD Pitner
5 LD Behrens
There's literally no wings. The best they have is Olausson, who is probably their 6th best prospect and probably has 3rd line upside. I'd certainly be willing to package both Hameenaho and Filmon as centerpieces in a deal for Colton.
We had to replace Wood SOMEHOW.Mike Hardman was signed, I kid you not.
I would be fine dealing Filmon but it would be a hard no for me on Lenni for this particular player.Colton would be a strong add, but Colorado does not overpay and Colton would not come cheap. Maybe they like Hameenaho or Filmon a lot?
I wouldn't trade Silayev, Casey, Gritsyuk or Yegorov given the state of the prospect pool, but I'd be willing to package in and two or three other guys for Colton, easy.
Colorado's prospect pool is not good. I'd rank them:
1 C Ritchie
2 LD Gulyayev
3 G Nabokov
4 RD Pitner
5 LD Behrens
There's literally no wings. The best they have is Olausson, who is probably their 6th best prospect and probably has 3rd line upside. I'd certainly be willing to package both Hameenaho and Filmon as centerpieces in a deal for Colton.
How much cash do we have left?