Reaper45
Registered User
Getting Toffoli vibes from Maxim Masse. I could see them being interested in him. Plays in the Q which I know they haven’t drafted from in awhile. Wouldn’t shock me.
Thank you for the feedback @Schrute farms and @CarlSneep here's the end result of the video.
Unfortunately I couldn't change the opacity of the mask (or I just couldn't figure out how); so I had a pause right before and right after the focus, too. Looking forward to feedback if this is better!
Great stuff KP. I’d find it very useful.Hey all, I wanted to run an idea through you all for those of you who have watched the videos I've made.
First of all, thank you!
Second of all, I was thinking of, in between each shift, to have a one second freeze frame and zeroing in on the player. That way the viewer (you) would be able to track immediately, as sometimes a player whose shift starts into the frame isn't obvious.
For example, I was making a video of Michael Hage. As my videos normally go, this is what the start of his shift would look like:
View attachment 880902
But adding a quick mask + 1 second long freeze frame, it would look like this:
View attachment 880903
Then the play would resume and look like normal, and you can see the entire ice again.
Do you find it unnecessary or distracting? My thought is it helps direct your eyes to the player immediately and not having an absurd pause, but I'm also creating this with the intent of it being helpful and useful to the audience.
I might still roll this video out like this, because maybe seeing it in action would be helpful, but wanted to get some sentiment as well.
BTW, before anyone asks, I just moved onto Michael Hage as a random player to make a video of. No inside info. Though obviously with where he's ranked, he might be someone LA has their sights on.
Thank you for the feedback @Schrute farms and @CarlSneep here's the end result of the video.
Unfortunately I couldn't change the opacity of the mask (or I just couldn't figure out how); so I had a pause right before and right after the focus, too. Looking forward to feedback if this is better!
Under DT there were so many picks where the player would never in a million years have been considered if he were 2-3 inches shorter, this continued a bit with DL too, looking at using top half of first round picks on guys like Teubert and Forbort.big guys that dont play big shouldn't get any special consideration
i was big on the Dean train at first but realized he's softer than PLD, makes Bjugstad look like Mean Joe Greene
In the year leading up to his draft there were scouts in The Hockey News that were touting Teubert as a top 5 pick with untapped offensive potential. He wasn't a reach in his draft position, but it's fair to say with hindsight that the plateau he hit in his draft year was a wall and not a speed bump.Under DT there were so many picks where the player would never in a million years have been considered if he were 2-3 inches shorter, this continued a bit with DL too, looking at using top half of first round picks on guys like Teubert and Forbort.
I'll give Blake credit, he has tried to find his jumbo sized guys outside of round 1 (Helenius, Dvorak Lee), the only huge dude he has used a 1st on is QB, and he had production in junior that warranted being picked where he was. Unfortunately for Blake, almost all of his under 6'1 guys have blown up in his face.
I don't remember that ranking about Teubert. He was just always touted as tough.In the year leading up to his draft there were scouts in The Hockey News that were touting Teubert as a top 5 pick with untapped offensive potential. He wasn't a reach in his draft position, but it's fair to say with hindsight that the plateau he hit in his draft year was a wall and not a speed bump.
Nope, the comparison used was "could be Scott Stevens but with untapped offensive potential". It's from the back of the draft issue where they discuss the top prospects for the following draft in their D-2 years.I don't remember that ranking about Teubert. He was just always touted as tough.
Nick Ebert was a consensus top-5 pick in his D-1 who the Kings took in the 7th round. His offensive potential was praised. Could it have been him?
Randomly, it is pretty funny the Kings took a Teubert, an Ebert, and a Forbort
Some scout was a Qbert fan?I don't remember that ranking about Teubert. He was just always touted as tough.
Nick Ebert was a consensus top-5 pick in his D-1 who the Kings took in the 7th round. His offensive potential was praised. Could it have been him?
Randomly, it is pretty funny the Kings took a Teubert, an Ebert, and a Forbort.
Cool, never saw that one, thanks for the clarity.Nope, the comparison used was "could be Scott Stevens but with untapped offensive potential". It's from the back of the draft issue where they discuss the top prospects for the following draft in their D-2 years.
You get a scout that thinks that and believes in a kid despite a blip, and you have yourself a recipe for a pick that doesn't pan out.
my favorite line was "Forbort is twice as good as Teubert"Randomly, it is pretty funny the Kings took a Teubert, an Ebert, and a Forbort.
I would have tried to make a joke about how much better E was better than 2 and 4 but I didn't know how long I'd be shoved in a locker.my favorite line was "Forbort is twice as good as Teubert"
see cus 4 is twice as good as 2 and yes Forbort was way better than Teubert but at the time we didn't know by how much...
PuckPedia just added a draft pick valuation tool.
According to it, the 21st OA would be roughly worth a high 2nd, mid 2nd, and high 3rd.
I'd probably take that trade honestly.
I always thought if you tried to multiply 0 the answer was always 0.my favorite line was "Forbort is twice as good as Teubert"
see cus 4 is twice as good as 2 and yes Forbort was way better than Teubert but at the time we didn't know by how much...
Yeah, #1 pick in his bantam draft, but a lot can change from 15 to pro. The crazy thing about Teubert is that it was basically over a year after he was picked. I remember arguing with a few people on this forum at the time about it, but the Kings sending him to the ECHL was game, set, match on his NHL career. I don't think a there has ever been a non-goalie first rounder who has played in the ECHL and ended up having an NHL career. That was one of a couple of crazy facts on Teubert, the other one that he was a 1st rounder who was not only not given a qualifying offer coming out of his ELC by his own team, but he wasn't picked up by anybody else and ended up in a second-tier European league before retiring. I think a strong case can be made that Teubert was the worst first round pick in NHL history (based on playing ability). At least for him he was able to get some NHL game-checks from the Oilers who were desperately trying to lose as many games as possible to increase their lottery odds. I assume Dean must have known right away, from the first rookie camp and into training camp that he made a massive mistake.In the year leading up to his draft there were scouts in The Hockey News that were touting Teubert as a top 5 pick with untapped offensive potential. He wasn't a reach in his draft position, but it's fair to say with hindsight that the plateau he hit in his draft year was a wall and not a speed bump.
So, I haven't used Redline in a while. And this shit is why. These are kids with a dream. And families who root for them.
I know there are times I'm not as critical or seem like I give fluff analyses, but calling prospects "tin men, scarecrows, and cowardly lions" is just small-dick energy. And politics aside, saying a player "plays with the amount of passion as Melania Trump exhibits standing next to that scrotum dipped in cheeto's dust" is utter trash.
So, when I write my articles, I'll put in areas of improvement. Because in the event one of them reads my articles, I want them to try to improve, and to hear they're not perfect. But the goal isn't to humiliate or make them the butt end of your own tacky jokes.
Just want to give context to why emotional intelligence is so important to writing these pieces.