Byron Bitz
Registered User
- Apr 6, 2010
- 8,036
- 4,400
I give day one an A- and day 2 a D-. Day one put us in a position to leave Vegas with two good prospects but a botched day 2 means we’re leaving with one
How do you know? Could be all tyler biggsBrad absolutely smashed it today. Really impressed with his work under difficult circumstances. Weird feeling having some prospects with size.
No they couldn't.How do you know? Could be all tyler biggs
They need it lolI can't believe what San Jose got in the first 2 rounds:
Celebrini
Dickinson
Chernyshov
Wellenius
Geez.
at his injury rate, that has to be at least 3 seasonsThey need skilled D.
He’s big, but he has less than 80 games left in his body.
Hopefully he wants too much of an overpay to live in Canada.
Right.No they couldn't.
Yeah. I mean, if Danford bucks the trend of the low ceiling firsts, like Biggs and Gauthier, from disappointing or busting, then yay, but as of now, it's about as "meh" a pick as you would want.How do you know? Could be all tyler biggs
I was thinking about 2 seasons.at his injury rate, that has to be at least 3 seasons
They can be doing anything else.If Treliving/Shanny arent looking to recoup picks via kampf and jarkork wtf are they doing
Marner seems to be coming back/not dealt at minimum
We are looking to run the same core with roy + zadorov/tanev added
They (extending to hunter+lou+dubas and mlse as a whole) have been doing anything else but building a cup contending team since 2017They can be doing anything else.
Not a fan of Wes Clark I take it?Right.
But they could be Biggs and Gordeev and Rasanen and Korshkov and Greenway and Middleton and Mattinen and Chebykin and Nielsen and Desrocher and Engvall and Gauthier and Olden
Idk why people choose to ignore the fact that we have been drafting big players all along, across GMs, and it's just that none of them amounted to much because size does not automatically equal success...
They have been aggressive. They just haven't done what you wanted.They (extending to hunter+lou+dubas and mlse as a whole) have been doing anything else but building a cup contending team since 2017
Bad moves, no long term vision, complacency mindset has led to 8 years of complacent 1st round results
You may think otherwise, but not being aggresive pre and at the draft for a team who has failed as often and heavily as the Toronto Maple Leafs is not a good sign to put faith and trust into this ownership + management group
That has nothing to do with what I said at allNot a fan of Wes Clark I take it?
I give day one an A- and day 2 a D-. Day one put us in a position to leave Vegas with two good prospects but a botched day 2 means we’re leaving with one
Hopefully we've drafted good, big players. Other teams seem to manage it.That has nothing to do with what I said at all
I like a lot of what he has done in the past 5 years and he has shown a shrewd and keen sense at scouting, not afraid to listen to his team of scouts and advocate for their picks
I do think this year's draft was a little focused on "we need grit and truculence!" and very little less focused on actual ceilings.
I do think most of the picks were off the board and picked ahead of the more consensus rankings
But I also think their team of pro scouts knows more than consensus rankings and scouting players as a hobby, like me
But then - and mostly to the point - I think none of that, or how I feel about Clark, has anything to do with people claiming we've only drafted smaller players in the past, when in fact, we've always picked a mix of players of size, and those players of size had proportionally less success.
Trading the 23rd for 31st + 58th and then 58th for a 2nd + 7th isnt aggresive, it is typical everyday moves. Not moves a team in need of a major retool/shift needsThey have been aggressive. They just haven't done what you wanted.
Neither are you.Your not nearly delusional enough to think otherwise but you continue to play the act for some strange reason