SpezDispenser
Registered User
- Aug 15, 2007
- 27,529
- 7,118
Me too. Badly.Dammit, I wanted to see that clapper on the PP.
Me too. Badly.Dammit, I wanted to see that clapper on the PP.
Agreed, in a scenario they have some injuries early can they pick him up? Overall he should go back but would have liked to see him in regular season games to see how he does.I would have given him at least a few games personally. He earned it.
I like this decision because it shows that we mean business.
We're not at the point where we're giving "candies" to 19 year olds anymore. Yak had a GREAT training camp and preseason, and he could have played a couple of games, but that can potentially put our regular season record in peril if he costs us goals when the real show starts.
I don't mind this at all, and everybody agrees long-term it's the best move. He got a good taste. Let him dominate and let's see if he's improved even more by the time the WJC comes.
This is actually the first time I'm pretty pissed with the new management.
Quality of play should dictate who plays and Yak was good enough to get regular season games. If he played well enough he should stay up all year. In my mind it's a terrible message to players like JBD who get a spit they don't deserve.
You are only rushing a player if he doesn't play up to standards.
This is actually the first time I'm pretty pissed with the new management.
Quality of play should dictate who plays and Yak was good enough to get regular season games. If he played well enough he should stay up all year. In my mind it's a terrible message to players like JBD who get a spit they don't deserve.
You are only rushing a player if he doesn't play up to standards.
I think a management and coaching group with ~4000 NHL games played that includes 3 former captains realize that the pre-season is just the pre-season.
While it does matter, their job is to forecast what roster will have the best results over 82 games, not reward the players who played best over a 2 week span in September.
For a young guy like Yakemchuk, the focus is also on what sets him up best for the next 5 years, not the next 6 months.
I personally would've like to see him get the 9 games, but objectively, going back to junior to play 23+ minutes a night and gear up for the WJC is probably the right call.
I agree that it was likely the correct outcome but you gotta give him a chance.
If leading the league in preseason defenceman scoring while not looking bad defensively doesn't earn you a look in the regular season, what does?
It's the same loser message this team has been delivering the last 7 years...
Agree to disagree.I loved Yakemchuk's pre-season, but like I said, he just turned 19 and it was the pre-season.
The message I see is that this groups actually has a plan and aren't just chasing the next shiny object to sell tickets and puff out their chest about how smart they are.
Agree to disagree.
I like meritocracy. It's the best message to a team. Worst case he goes down after a couple games and his development is the same or better. Best case he proves he is ready and has a great season. It's win win.
This is just bad messaging and In my opinion a mistake by the leadership group. By no means am I giving up on them but it just shows how human hockey people are.
If they plan to make a waiver claim they needed to send him to junior.Agree to disagree.
I like meritocracy. It's the best message to a team. Worst case he goes down after a couple games and his development is the same or better. Best case he proves he is ready and has a great season. It's win win.
This is just bad messaging and In my opinion a mistake by the leadership group. By no means am I giving up on them but it just shows how human hockey people are.