Is literally anyone else in the organization held to this standard? Edit: that's not arthur kaliyev
That's my beef with it.
I know what you and Herby and Bland and others are saying about it. I 'get' it. I just think it's horseshit in light of all the other shit players do.
"x sucked last night and took a stupid selfish penalty" happens to like two Kings a night.
Kind of the same response I had for Sol, but if it was Fiala instead of Laf, a lot of people would be stoked about it but it's Laf and we love him so this is bullshit. If it was Trevor Lewis, 95% of the board would be stoked.
You aren't arguing for Lewis as your point is other players do similar things and don't get the same treatment. Again, I have to counter with the fact that the penalty was stupid and directly led to the only goal in the game. It was the turning point as Edmonton came out and just boat raced them during that 4 v 4. Toss in the opponent and the fact they are having trouble scoring even one goal and you have this particular selfish penalty by a player going through a slump being magnified.
I understand how Fiala and his two points and nine games while doing dumb shit is more frustrating than Laf making a mistake, but Laf is the one that did it in this situation and not Fiala so here we are.
Then don't bring Laf's production into your argument when he has more points than the both of them combined because it seems like you're intentionally obfuscating the point when you bring up his production.
Facts
1. Laf is better than both Moore and Lewis.
2. Benching Laf for standing up for himself is moronic when you're losing.
3. Keeping bums like Lewis in the line up as the 11th forward is already playing down 2 men.
4. Kings cant score, there is zero reason to bench Laf. He could have bitched him out after the game.
5. Hiller is a dumb ass coach for doing so.
If you disagree with any of this, please make a point. Because none of what you said earlier was grounded in reality. I am sorry for the hostile tone earlier, I had edited but you took the brunt of it.
I bring up his production because nine of his 13 goals were in the first 16 games of the year. He has four over his last 25 games for a full season pace of 13, one goal more than last year. Before his injury, Moore had five goals in 13 games which just so happens to be a full season pace of 31 goals like he scored last year. In the 17 games before the injury, he had 15 of his 18 points. Point being is that he is a more proven product and they want to get him going again: they need him to get going again, and, once again, he isn't the one that gave the coach an opportunity to bench him for taking a stupid penalty.
As for benching him when they are losing, he wasn't helping them win when he was on the ice last night and he hasn't been doing much for a good stretch now. This goes back to RJs point about other people don't get the same treatment but, again, this is the first time he has received this treatment and I can't recall a similar moment where Hiller could have benched someone: and I'm talking all of the factors and not just a selfish penalty.
Lewis in his spot as the 11th/12th forward has no relation to Laf being benched and is a different topic to be upset at Hiller over. Even then, the ire shouldn't be at playing Lewis but rather choosing to dress seven defenseman so Burroughs can get four minutes of ice.
Kings can't score but either can Laf lately. Four goals in his last 25 games. It's not like Lewis took his minutes: Fiala and Foegele did and the latter definitely deserved it last night. Regardless, there is a short game and a long game and this, IMO, is a long game move so simply bitching him out after the game doesn't make the point. These guys want ice and they are supposed to respond to it being taken away from them. Yelling at them after the game and then giving them their usual minutes is what everyone on here complains about when it comes to accountability. I think we see a killer game from Laf next time out.
I'm not really in either camp on Hiller. Since I'm not coming into this with an agenda to burn this guy, I think it was a perfectly fine move for a coach to do with a young kid who I believe has the character to respond properly. All the belly aching also ignores the fact that Hiller is playing this kid 16:27 on average a night and it looks like even more minutes than that on average the last 20 games, last night notwithstanding.
When you look at it like that, this is a case of the coach actually holding a "real" player accountable as opposed to a scoring prospect on the 4th line not producing so he is scratched.