GDT: 2024-25 season game 11 LA Kings vs Vegas Golden Knights @7:00pm 10/30/24

GoldenBearHockey

Registered User
Jan 6, 2014
10,189
4,280
And the trade came with a large contract extension for Fiala while the ANA/PHI one allowed ANA to have a guy on his full ELC.

I don't believe I said teams wouldn't trade promising young defenseman for a proven scoring forward because they obviously do, you just don't want to be the ones on the losing end of McDonagh for Gomez or Sergachev for Drouin.

You don't wanna be on the losing side of any trade....I don't think the Fiala trade is a winner/loser situation though,

Other one which is a long time now go figure was the Seth Jones for Ryan Johannson deal....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frolov 6'3

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,877
12,028
Second in rookie scoring. Second in Calder votes. No. 1 defenseman (6th overall average ice time in entire league among all blueliners).

"Not that good."

First we were wrong for hating the trade because of what we thought he could become. Now we're wrong for hating the trade because of what he's become.

You can't make this up.

Yeah, nobody following the game with even a remedial understanding would state something as ridiculous as that. Its just an attention grab.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,195
65,833
I.E.
Gentle reminder that if we got Fiala for a playoff boost

He is one of the worst playoff no shows of the generation

turns from a 60+ point avg player in the regular season to a 40 point player in the playoffs and thats without discussing the turnovers, liabilities, and penalties.

Yeah, nobody following the game with even a remedial understanding would state something as ridiculous as that. Its just an attention grab.

seriously, that's just absolute shit talking to the extent I wonder if we're all even talking about the same player.
 

BaileyFan

Registered User
Jun 14, 2023
680
1,382
Gentle reminder that if we got Fiala for a playoff boost

He is one of the worst playoff no shows of the generation

turns from a 60+ point avg player in the regular season to a 40 point player in the playoffs and thats without discussing the turnovers, liabilities, and penalties.



seriously, that's just absolute shit talking to the extent I wonder if we're all even talking about the same player.
Company line has evolved from “He would never have signed here anyway” to “Actually he’s just not that good”.
 

King'sPawn

Enjoy the chaos
Jul 1, 2003
22,826
23,276
And the trade came with a large contract extension for Fiala while the ANA/PHI one allowed ANA to have a guy on his full ELC.

I don't believe I said teams wouldn't trade promising young defenseman for a proven scoring forward because they obviously do, you just don't want to be the ones on the losing end of McDonagh for Gomez or Sergachev for Drouin.
Most notably, part of the reason Lombardi preached "build from the net out" is because of the time it takes for players to settle into their role. With goaltenders, so much of it is mentality, it takes time to mature. But defensemen can take time, and at the point of the trade, their defensemen on the right side (as far as prospects) were Durzi, Spence, Clarke, and Walker. Clarke had upside of a No. 1 defenseman, but they slow-boiled him. Nobody expected Durzi, Spence, or Walker to be a top-pairing guy.

As high as I was on Clarke, he also could have (and still could) miss. It's the antithesis of the Johnson trade, where Voynov was already on the same level as he (and he filled the RD slot to Johnson's Left-handed shot).

It was bad timing for the Fiala trade. The team needed a rebuild and to infuse its roster with a younger core. Not trading youth for another hurrah with the older core.
 

kilowatt

the vibes are not immaculate
Jan 1, 2009
18,664
21,719
Faber is almost a spitting image of Drew Doughty and I wouldn’t be surprised if he won a Norris at some point in his career. I don’t think there’s an active defenseman that more closely resembles Doughty’s game than Brock. Maybe a guy like McAvoy? That’s pretty good company.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Lt Dan and Omni Owl

Frolov 6'3

Unregistered User
Jun 7, 2003
13,226
3,640
The Netherlands
What success of Los Angeles?

The Kings are playoff fodder and put up more of a fight before Fiala was part of the equation. The Kings have won seven total playoff games since 2014. Minnesota has made the playoffs eight times and actually won a couple of rounds. What are we talking about here? We should thump our chest to the Wild because they missed the playoffs last season while the Kings got boat raced and bounced in five games?

Even if you want to call Fiala a great player and Faber only a solid one, the Kings are fodder themselves. Faber would be contributing longer and at a more important position than Fiala. It's pretty easy to understand.

Now, if this was the World Championships that Fiala can play in every season since they occur once the first round is over, I'd say do the trade because he's awesome in that format.
What success of Minny ? Somebody else came up with that because they have won a few games in a row. I don’t know.

Faber is a right handed defenseman which are already lacking in the NHL. It says enough about Minnesota’s defense that he is playing 25 minutes a night.

I was forced to watch a ton of Minnesota games last year unfortunately. Thats not a luxery.

Most here are statswatching. Rookie voting, calder finalist, ice time. Yes i see that too. I can name a ton of players who are getting too much ice time and are playing 1st line minutes due to being a right handed shot.

These trophy’s are a total waste of everybody’s time anyway. What a poverty that is every year.

Thats a US thing, stats stats stats, trophies 🏆, elections.

I think it needs some time. Wait a few years. I think some (not you specifically) have forgotten how good Drew actually was in his rookie and sophomore year.

Faber will have a good career like a Dan Hamhuis. LA got a good player in return. Vilardi we gave away for nothing.
 
Last edited:

lumbergh

It was an idea. I didn't say it was a good idea.
Jan 8, 2007
6,510
5,911
Richmond, VA
In my mind Fiala for Faber was a win-win. Kings got what they wanted and needed, a game-breaker who could juice the offense. The Wild got they wanted, a promising young player with a high ceiling, and got what they needed, to get value out of an RFA they couldn't afford due to the Parise & Suter buyouts. Kings dealt from a position of strength at the time. Both teams got what they wanted and needed.

I don't see why two teams can't both benefit from a trade. People seem to think that a trade is a zero sum game, that one team has to lose a trade. I hope Fiala continues to provide PPG offense. I hope Faber continues to perform well for the Wild. Good for them. Worked out well for both teams so far.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,195
65,833
I.E.
In my mind Fiala for Faber was a win-win. Kings got what they wanted and needed, a game-breaker who could juice the offense. The Wild got they wanted, a promising young player with a high ceiling, and got what they needed, to get value out of an RFA they couldn't afford due to the Parise & Suter buyouts. Kings dealt from a position of strength at the time. Both teams got what they wanted and needed.

I don't see why two teams can't both benefit from a trade. People seem to think that a trade is a zero sum game, that one team has to lose a trade. I hope Fiala continues to provide PPG offense. I hope Faber continues to perform well for the Wild. Good for them. Worked out well for both teams so far.

*against nonplayoff teams

**offer available during regular season only

***may actually uno reverse you and break game open for opposing team instead
 

Omni Owl

Mar 9, 2008
6,545
1,091
What success of Minny ? Somebody else came up with that because they have won a few games in a row. I don’t know.

Faber is a right handed defenseman which are already lacking in the NHL. It says enough about Minnesota’s defense that he is playing 25 minutes a night.

I was forced to watch a ton of Minnesota games last year unfortunately. Thats not a luxery.

Most here are statswatching. Rookie voting, calder finalist, ice time. Yes i see that too. I can name a ton of players who are getting too much ice time and are playing 1st line minutes due to being a right handed shot.

These trophy’s are a total waste of everybody’s time anyway. What a poverty that is every year.

Thats a US thing, stats stats stats, trophies 🏆, elections.

I think it needs some time. Wait a few years. I think some (not you specifically) have forgotten how good Drew actually was in his rookie and sophomore year.

Faber will have a good career like a Dan Hamhuis. LA got a good player in return. Vilardi we gave away for nothing.
Wild look strong this year, at least a middle round playoff team, certainly more success than us. They're also about to lose those awful Parise and Suter contracts. Brodin used to be their young gun top pair defender until Faber came along. Point being, they're in a better position than we are thanks to Blake's idiocy as a GM, which is really saying something considering Guerin is also a pretty lackluster GM himself. What does that say about our front office when they get bent over by the likes of Guerin? Both trades are equally horrendous in my eyes, but Faber more so because #1 right shot D-men are hard to come by + Faber doesn't have the injury history Vilardi has.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BaileyFan

Frolov 6'3

Unregistered User
Jun 7, 2003
13,226
3,640
The Netherlands
Wild look strong this year, at least a middle round playoff team, certainly more success than us. Brodin used to be their young gun top pair defender until Faber came along. Point being, they're in a better position than we are thanks to Blake's idiocy as a GM, which is really saying something considering Guerin is also a pretty lackluster GM. What does that say about our front office when they get bent over by the likes of Guerin? Both trades are equally horrendous in my eyes, but Faber more so because #1 right shot D-men are hard to come by + Faber doesn't have the injury history Vilardi has.
Fair enough, we have to agree to disagree.

Still LA is not lacking a right shot defenseman and with Faber as franchise #1 defenseman you are not getting far. Same with Brodin.

Thats why Minnesota is league filling.
 

unicornpig

Registered User
Dec 8, 2017
3,748
5,480
In my mind Fiala for Faber was a win-win. Kings got what they wanted and needed, a game-breaker who could juice the offense. The Wild got they wanted, a promising young player with a high ceiling, and got what they needed, to get value out of an RFA they couldn't afford due to the Parise & Suter buyouts. Kings dealt from a position of strength at the time. Both teams got what they wanted and needed.

I don't see why two teams can't both benefit from a trade. People seem to think that a trade is a zero sum game, that one team has to lose a trade. I hope Fiala continues to provide PPG offense. I hope Faber continues to perform well for the Wild. Good for them. Worked out well for both teams so far.
at the time it was a win-win, now in hindsight it looks like a massive L for LA. but who knows if LA kept Faber what it would have done with the massive log jam on RD the kings already had. one of blakes biggest failures among many was not trading defenseman and keeping them far too long where they had little to no value.
 

BigKing

Blake Out of Hell III: Back in to Hell
Mar 11, 2003
11,655
12,610
Belmont Shore, CA
google.com
What success of Minny ? Somebody else came up with that because they have won a few games in a row. I don’t know.

Faber is a right handed defenseman which are already lacking in the NHL. It says enough about Minnesota’s defense that he is playing 25 minutes a night.

I was forced to watch a ton of Minnesota games last year unfortunately. Thats not a luxery.

Most here are statswatching. Rookie voting, calder finalist, ice time. Yes i see that too. I can name a ton of players who are getting too much ice time and are playing 1st line minutes due to being a right handed shot.

These trophy’s are a total waste of everybody’s time anyway. What a poverty that is every year.

Thats a US thing, stats stats stats, trophies 🏆, elections.

I think it needs some time. Wait a few years. I think some (not you specifically) have forgotten how good Drew actually was in his rookie and sophomore year.

Faber will have a good career like a Dan Hamhuis. LA got a good player in return. Vilardi we gave away for nothing.
Unfortunate part of this argument for you is that you can't use stat watching as an attack when trying to support Fiala. He's a stat watching all-star.

As for Minnesota, they aren't playoff fodder because Faber is the #1 defenseman: he's played one full season and they are eating a ton of dead cap space. He will be a major part of any future success they have and he's going to have more time to have success with them than Fiala will here in LA.

Also, just because you have a stud RHD already, doesn't mean having more than one is a bad idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: King'sPawn

Statto

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 9, 2014
5,665
8,008
That's essentially the whole Karlsson vs. Doughty argument. Now imagine if we had Doughty and Karlsson on the same pairing. We could've had that in Faber and Clarke.
Except they are all RHS… but I take your point.

The question for me with Faber is around if he is actually a no1 d man or a number 2 playing the role of a #1. People saw Roy as a #3 but for me he was a solid but average #4 guy that, even then, only properly flourished in that slot when Gav signed.

I’ve not seen enough on Faber to have a valid opinion. For the record I was a huge Faber fan from the day we drafted him. I never predicted him as a no1 but IIRC a 2/3 level guy. I was ok with the trade or would have been without the 1st round pick. The rebuild had already ended too early so it was the right type of trade to make, in that context. It was always a question of which RHD was moved for more scoring.
 

BaileyFan

Registered User
Jun 14, 2023
680
1,382
Wild look strong this year, at least a middle round playoff team, certainly more success than us. They're also about to lose those awful Parise and Suter contracts. Brodin used to be their young gun top pair defender until Faber came along. Point being, they're in a better position than we are thanks to Blake's idiocy as a GM, which is really saying something considering Guerin is also a pretty lackluster GM himself. What does that say about our front office when they get bent over by the likes of Guerin? Both trades are equally horrendous in my eyes, but Faber more so because #1 right shot D-men are hard to come by + Faber doesn't have the injury history Vilardi has.
Plenty of mediocre GM’s wind up making the best trade of their careers when Blake is on the other side of the table. Chayka, Cheveldayoff, Benning, Guerin, and Kekalainen are all considered lackluster to some degree and all have taken Blake for a ride, and usually do so even when Blake has all the leverage in the deal.

"rob completed half the job...i am with aeg on this aspect"

jfc
It’s a bit dude. Did you expect anything else?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chris kontos

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad