Point Totals
Looking at the AHL Stats page, Pasta is screaming up the rankings and is tied for team lead with Colangelo. Quite a redemption arc for Pasta, who was sent down to the ECHL to start the season and only called up due to a few NHL call-ups, AHL injuries, and a need for more scoring on the AHL club.
Of the three RW's, Colangelo is the only one with a right shot.
View attachment 963753
Points per Game
Now, looking at the Pt/G (points per game), Meyer and Luneau have been rising along with Pasta.
View attachment 963757
With all this offensive talk, the down side is we have only two players with a plus rating in C Harkins (+2) and RW Colangelo (+2). We have 14 players with a -4 rating or worse, the highest being a -15 rating from C Carpenter.
GA and Goalies
The team is tied at 20th out of 32 AHL teams for GF with 105 goals for and 30th in GA with 136 goals allowed. A lot of those GA is a product of terrible netminding.
View attachment 963766
The team's best netminder is out for the season in Suchanek. Here are his numbers last year with the Gulls.
Suchanek
View attachment 963769
Thank you for doing these. And doesn’t this kinda prove the point Verbeek and co are doing a good job, also with the fact that most AHL call ups under McIlvane have been solid at best and not one has really looked completely unready for the moment. (Luneau never played AHL until after the start of the year, and the stats are matching with development hopefully.).
I think the key to a successful rebuild is creating a pipeline to the NHL squad. Get as many late 1st / 2nd / 3rd / 4th and 5th round picks who stylistically matches the DNA for what type of team you want to build and play style you want to incorporate.
Verbeek has said he wants a big, strong skating, competitive team that’s aggressive and hard to play against.
That sounds like a physical grind over 82 games. Isn’t the sheltering of young players key to their development too. Now the point can be made, and I’m making it….. that now is the time (or very soon, like the return of Zegras) to play in not players under 30 years old in the top 6 offensively.
Zegras / cutter / Mason / Leo .. some combination of two of these on a line with Terry, and two of these on a line with Colangelo.
McT - Leo - Terry
Cutter - Zegras - Colangelo
Cutter - Leo - Terry
McT - Zegras - Colangelo
Zegras - Leo - Terry
Cutter - McT - Colangelo
Assuming Leo is being given 1C responsibilities, these are some lines that seem possible.
With a vets third line and a 4th of
Nesty / Gaucher / Harkins. (Harkins a good pk face off guy to shelter Gaucher if need be)
Leason as your extra…. Mcginn if he is even available, can take the place of Nesty if he struggles. Or you call up Myatovic / Judd / Pasta / Sidorov all except I believe pasta have spent time with Gaucher.
Johnston is waived.
Defensively you either trade Dumo, or have a tough talk with your captain. You’re old, you played a physical brand of hockey for us last season and then played with Czech to a tournament win. Take 1-2 weeks off and rest the body. You’re statistically the worse defender on the ice. (This is true right, I think I’ve read it on here). Stop gap captain making stop gap captain sacrifices.
Go something like.
LaCombe - Trouba
Minty - Dumo
Zelly - Helleson
You can swap Zelly or helleson and Dumo if you want to really try 3 of our young 4 in the top 4.
Building up the pipeline is the first aspect, (you know coinciding with selling off tangible NHL players for assets the should match your timeline to being competitive playoff team.)
The second benchmark is when to take the training wheels off (obviously while working on a workout regime to add muscle and strength to core areas for hockey players.) and start analyzing who is going to be a part of the future of this team. If I was doing that as a GM and tried to tread water as long as I could with the veterans leading way to not over exert you’re young players who some are trying to playing 82 games for the first time in their career, then take the training wheels off with about 20-35 games left (depending on the analytics of young players and how hard we can push them without hurting them.). If somehow we let the kids play, and we look good and have underlining stats to back that up, then you still have time to add at the trade deadline and no longer only using your cupboard of draft picks as darts for the dart board, but acquiring NHL talent that fits your timeline and improve your team.
You know when people say they’ve invested in analytics, but our suck. Wouldn’t it make sense to slice out a piece of the pie from all that money on, the brute force players take on their bodies, how hard to push players to their limits without sacrificing wearing them down, and things of this nature. Basically a handbook for how not to overexert your young players and risking long term health issues. Also what injuries can be played through without longterm repercussions and learn how to pay through pain, not injuries that can get worse.
This MGMT team has been pretty damn transparent all things considered.
Hockey duckie you just posted stats that paint a picture of individual development at the AHL level (and stats don’t tell the whole story), coupled with the fact that most if not all the AHL talent is coming up and looking good in the show. Yet the team is playing better, but still losing. The stats have not yet matched wins.
Here at Matt McIlvane’s press conference he says almost verbatim….. “individual development while still building a family culture is the most important priority and with that the wins should follow.
Are there issues we can complain about ? Most definitely, but Verbeek has been an executive for 16 years in the NHL mostly as an Asst Gm to someone who helped build a multiple Stanley cut championship dynasty.
Can we screw this up? Of course, but they’ve stated they have a vision and a plan in place to change that. Why would Verbeek spell out his plans, his job is at stake, he doesn’t want to explain every little thing they do, maybe Utah isn’t doing these things with new owners (don’t know their GM or who is running hockey ops.). But Verbeek watched the building of a dynasty, not including any new things people have thought up to improve.
While using the NHL club as a developmental league, I gotta assume minutes restriction and not making adjustments to our awful offensive scheme, has something to do with physically sheltering the younger players from the true grind of a playoff team over the course of an 82 game season. Especially after a year of major injuries.
I just don’t see a competent GM overlooking these things. Verbeek did say he liked overcooking prospects, maybe sheltering them is a way to do that at the NHL level, while also getting much needed game reps at a young age.