Speculation: 2024-25 Roster thread

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
50,244
41,982
Orange County, CA
We are almost a eeek from training camp and with today’s PTOs our roster and the competition for the remaining spots are beginning to come into form.

I see 11 locks at forward: Zegras, McTavish, Carlsson, Terry, Strome, Killorn, Vatrano, Gauthier, Lundestrom, Leason, and Fabbri.

Leaving the following players competing for 2-3 spots: McGinn, Johnston, Harkins, Meyer, Katchouk, Nesterenko, Regenda, Colangelo, and Sennecke.

I think we have 6 locks at D: Fowler, Mintyukov, Gudas, Lacombe, Vaakanainen, and Dumoulin, with it being very likely that Zellweger is on the team as well.

So only 1-2 spots open for Luneau, Lindstrom, Pysyk, and Helleson
 
Aug 11, 2011
28,571
22,853
Am Yisrael Chai
We are almost a eeek from training camp and with today’s PTOs our roster and the competition for the remaining spots are beginning to come into form.

I see 11 locks at forward: Zegras, McTavish, Carlsson, Terry, Strome, Killorn, Vatrano, Gauthier, Lundestrom, Leason, and Fabbri.

Leaving the following players competing for 2-3 spots: McGinn, Johnston, Harkins, Meyer, Katchouk, Nesterenko, Regenda, Colangelo, and Sennecke.

I think we have 6 locks at D: Fowler, Mintyukov, Gudas, Lacombe, Vaakanainen, and Dumoulin, with it being very likely that Zellweger is on the team as well.

So only 1-2 spots open for Luneau, Lindstrom, Pysyk, and Helleson
I have a tough time seeing Leason as a lock.
 

DavidBL

Registered User
Jul 25, 2012
6,161
4,160
Orange, CA
We already have a ton of fringe forwards competing for a limited number of roster spots, why add a 36 year old to that mix?
Experience, one less guy to worry about developing and adds a style we don't really have? If he's washed then pass. Imo, we're developing too many players at once. One less player to worry about I guess. Not saying we should, just a thought. I'm not enamored with Leason and if we got an established upgrade I'd do it. Clutterbuck might not be though.
 

All Mighty

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
12,135
19,238
California
allmightyhockeytalk.com
Experience, one less guy to worry about developing and adds a style we don't really have? If he's washed then pass. Imo, we're developing too many players at once. One less player to worry about I guess. Not saying we should, just a thought. I'm not enamored with Leason and if we got an established upgrade I'd do it. Clutterbuck might not be though.
If even Lou Lamoriello doesn’t want him anymore, then I have to assume he’s super washed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JabbaJabba

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,280
13,303
southern cal
Training camp starts on Thursday. Might as well get one of these season predictions started. Copy and paste the table. Then fill in the blanks.


Ducks2023-24Ducks2024-25Predictions
PlayerAgePosGPGAPTSGAPTS
1​
Frank Vatrano
29​
LW
82​
37​
23​
60​
2​
Troy Terry
26​
C
76​
20​
34​
54​
3​
Mason McTavish
21​
C
64​
19​
23​
42​
4​
Ryan Strome
30​
C
79​
11​
30​
41​
5​
Cam Fowler
32​
D
81​
5​
34​
39​
6​
Alex Killorn
34​
C
63​
18​
18​
36​
7​
Leo Carlsson
19​
C
55​
12​
17​
29​
8​
Pavel Mintyukov
20​
D
63​
4​
24​
28​
9​
Brett Leason
24​
RW
68​
11​
11​
22​
10​
Radko Gudas
33​
D
66​
6​
12​
18​
11​
Jackson LaCombe
23​
D
71​
2​
15​
17​
12​
Trevor Zegras
22​
C
31​
6​
9​
15​
13​
Urho Vaakanainen
25​
D
68​
1​
13​
14​
14​
Isac Lundeström
24​
C
46​
5​
6​
11​
15​
Olen Zellweger
20​
D
26​
2​
7​
9​
16​
Ross Johnston
29​
LW
68​
1​
3​
4​
17​
Tristan Luneau
20​
D
7​
1​
2​
3​
18​
Brock McGinn
29​
LW
24​
1​
2​
3​
19​
Cutter Gauthier
20​
LW
1​
0​
1​
1​
20​
Robby Fabbri
28​
LW
68​
18​
14​
32​
21​
Brian Dumolin
33​
LD
80​
6​
10​
16​
 

The Duck Knight

Henry, you're our only hope!
Sponsor
Feb 6, 2012
8,303
4,924
702
With the chemistry Vatrano, MacTavish and Strome showed last year, I don't know why more people don't have them together in line ups.

Mainly because they were awful defensively and after the first couple months stopped producing too. Seems like it will be Z-McT-Terry to start camp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngelDuck

DavidBL

Registered User
Jul 25, 2012
6,161
4,160
Orange, CA
Mainly because they were awful defensively and after the first couple months stopped producing too. Seems like it will be Z-McT-Terry to start camp.
So it would seem based on the roster posts. Though it's not like any of the lines were any good defensively. I really do think Z is better at center so I'm not a big fan of those proposed lines for camp.
 

Bergey37

Registered User
May 19, 2019
947
1,021
So it would seem based on the roster posts. Though it's not like any of the lines were any good defensively. I really do think Z is better at center so I'm not a big fan of those proposed lines for camp.
It's camp, and it's the start of camp - it's a time for experimentation. I'd be surprised ion any of these combinations last through opening night.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad