2024-25 Roster Thread #2: Midseasonnar

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,927
172,144
Armored Train
ES points are more "stable."
At lower levels they're also better predictors b/c they reflect playing with smaller windows.
Top players get a lot of lower level PP points simply b/c they play on PP1.

Think about the Flyer PP, even a player as good as Michkov isn't going to pile up points the way he would on a top PP, conversely on a good PP, the 4th and 5th players on PP1 are going to get 20+ points just by "being there" (i.e. passing the puck around and picking up assists).

Cool but PP goals still count so entirely writing them off is weird, and as I recall you only become so gung ho on this silly point of completely disregarding PP production as a means to defend bad decisionmaking around Voracek and Ghost.
 

Lord Defect

Secretary of Blowtorching
Nov 13, 2013
19,076
35,155
No because only a few players get to play on PP1.
So if you want to compare apples to apples, stick with ES points.
Still affected by teams, schemes, linemates, but more informative.

Bergeron is a good example, played on the PP early in his career, then taken off after a few years b/c he was too valuable in other roles. Still the same player even if his point totals were smaller.

Which doesn't mean PP points don't have value. But that's special teams play, just like the PK.
Why value PP points more than PK points avoided (harder to measure but mirror image)?
IMG_6646.jpeg

IMG_7372.gif


So the Cup champs, a team run by a living fossil, and a team run by a triumvirate.
The rangers made a trade though
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

Ad

Ad

Ad