2024-25 Roster Thread #1: The Beginninging

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,275
159,551
Huron of the Lakes
Among players with similar minutes, only Abols took less shot attempts than Luchanko at 5v5. Luchanko only took 5 attempts all-situations in 4 games, despite constant PP time and NHL top 9 linemates. I'd wager most of them were crashing the net. The inability to manufacture your own shot (against a lot of AHL competition) is usually a telltale sign you're having trouble. Those are Cates-like numbers.

If Luchanko were to stick, it's not going to be due to his offense.
It'll be b/c his IQ, maturity and speed allow him to be effective as a defense first center who can provide a little offense.
It's unlikely, but it's an easier transition than an offense first player who isn't fundamentally sound on defense.

You're trying to kill me. Sometimes I imagine you're Michael Myers and I'm Dr. Loomis. "I spent eight years trying to reach him, and then another seven trying to keep him locked up, because I realized that what was living behind that user's posts was purely and simply......contrarian."

On some level, I know what you're saying. But no 18 year old, with middling draft year production, should EVER stick in the NHL because of defense. It's a recipe for stalling future progress. But a point that needs emphasis: you have zero idea if he's good defensively at age 18 in the NHL. Assuming defensive impact for anyone is a foolhardy exercise. Let alone assuming an 18 year old is the next Patrice Bergeron. They drafted him 13th overall imaging he is a core piece. They should not give one f*** about his defense today.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
129,552
169,262
Armored Train
If Luchanko were to stick, it's not going to be due to his offense.
It'll be b/c his IQ, maturity and speed allow him to be effective as a defense first center who can provide a little offense.
It's unlikely, but it's an easier transition than an offense first player who isn't fundamentally sound on defense.

Most top offensive players (unless we're talking Bedard level) are going to struggle to score at the NHL level at 18, and their bad defense will be quickly exposed.

The worry is even if Luchanko is advanced defensively, fear of making mistakes will make him too passive, and if encouraged to take risks, lack of experience will result in too many mistakes, making him risk adverse.

This is nightmarish
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
129,552
169,262
Armored Train
It's just a difficult to develop offence in the NHL at 18 as it is defence. I'd argue it's harder.

Look at Cates. 25 years old and still a 4th liner offensively. If offence is so much easier to figure out, why are the Flyers so inept at it?

If anything, defense is easier to figure out. Get in the way and work hard, and you can mask a lot of sins. No amount of working hard is going to generate skill, or have you suddenly figure out how to make space for yourself and others.

We've seen plenty of scoring forwards learn how to also be good at defense. How many defensive forwards have learned how to score?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: freakydallas13

JojoTheWhale

Lusting Stromboli
May 22, 2008
35,088
109,093
If defensive players have an easier transition for merit-based reasons, why don't any defensive specialists go straight to the NHL?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Magua

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,068
142,757
Philadelphia, PA
I actually don’t disagree with the logic but Charlie was saying weeks ago the Flyers didn’t like the 9 game trial because what is 9 games going to really tell you that you didn’t already know? The second part was once the kid has a taste of the NHL & all that comes with it on/off the ice (the best league in the world, the paychecks, the big cities, the luxury travel/stay, etc.). you’re setting a major disappointment when you pull the plug on that.

I guess so much for that. :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: JojoTheWhale

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
50,114
21,929
If defensive players have an easier transition for merit-based reasons, why don't any defensive specialists go straight to the NHL?
There are few talented defensive specialists at lower levels.
Because if they have real talent, they are usually pushed into a high minute offensive role.
I actually don’t disagree with the logic but Charlie was saying weeks ago the Flyers didn’t like the 9 game trial because what is 9 games going to really tell you that you didn’t already know? The second part was once the kid has a taste of the NHL & all that comes with it on/off the ice (the best league in the world, the paychecks, the big cities, the luxury travel/stay, etc.). you’re setting a major disappointment when you pull the plug on that.

I guess so much for that. :laugh:
He's 18. He'll have great memories, a $100K in his pocket and the knowledge that he's close to a slam dunk next season to start.

So I doubt he'll be that disappointed if he's sent down.
 

freakydallas13

Registered User
Jan 30, 2007
7,264
17,808
Victoria, BC
If anything, defense is easier to figure out. Get in the way and work hard, and you can mask a lot of sins. No amount of working hard is going to generate skill, or have you suddenly figure out how to make space for yourself and others.

We've seen plenty of scoring forwards learn how to also be good at defense. How many defensive forwards have learned how to score?
Do we have a single example of a player the Flyers took from "stone hands but rock solid defensively" and instilled offensive production in him at the expense of defence? I honestly can't think of a single one, but I can come up with about a dozen examples of them doing the reverse (they love turning scorers into grinders).
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
May 8, 2011
38,008
75,213
Philadelphia, Pa
Do we have a single example of a player the Flyers took from "stone hands but rock solid defensively" and instilled offensive production in him at the expense of defence? I honestly can't think of a single one, but I can come up with about a dozen examples of them doing the reverse (they love turning scorers into grinders).

Better than Shayne Gostisbehere, Post Tahoe Robert Hagg
 
  • Wow
Reactions: freakydallas13

freakydallas13

Registered User
Jan 30, 2007
7,264
17,808
Victoria, BC
He's 18. He'll have great memories, a $100K in his pocket and the knowledge that he's close to a slam dunk next season to start.
I'm so glad this team's path to success is "whatever gives 18 year old the greatest memories". Surely this is the way to a Stanley Cup.

Side not, forget the entire "Luchanko is sticking because he is amazing at defence argument" I think is stupid, what have you seen to suggest he actually is a defensive wizard? Eye test? Numbers? Because I have to be honest, I don't quite see the same Bergeron-esque defensive wizard you keep claiming him to be.
 

Sombastate

Registered User
Jun 19, 2011
10,716
8,824
Las Vegas
Nice!

If you see someone in a Kimmo blouse at Rogers Arena, that'll almost certainly be me.... still waiting to see anyone else rocking a Timonen jersey. :laugh:
"hello sir, are you canadian Flyer 88?"

I'll be wearing a Michkov jersey, and shepherding a german woman who is out of my league. Not sure how many ugly Flyer fans there are with german women in Vancouver, so not sure if this helps
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CanadianFlyer88

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
50,114
21,929
I'm so glad this team's path to success is "whatever gives 18 year old the greatest memories". Surely this is the way to a Stanley Cup.

Side not, forget the entire "Luchanko is sticking because he is amazing at defence argument" I think is stupid, what have you seen to suggest he actually is a defensive wizard? Eye test? Numbers? Because I have to be honest, I don't quite see the same Bergeron-esque defensive wizard you keep claiming him to be.
Exaggeration much?
He's fundamentally sound and has elite speed.
So he's unlikely to be a defensive liability.
All that means if he struggles offensively, he's not a huge liability, leaking goals.

And he certainly doesn't have stone hands (now Poehling . . .) he's a good passer, his shot is undeveloped at this point.

I'd still be surprised if he sticks, I expect against real competition his inexperience will show.
But it'll resolve itself, if he's overmatched it's an easy decision.

"hello sir, are you canadian Flyer 88?"

I'll be wearing a Michkov jersey, and shepherding a german woman who is out of my league. Not sure how many ugly Flyer fans there are with german women in Vancouver, so not sure if this helps
German is pretty generic.
Is she "beer garden waitress" German?
Or Berlin underground German?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad