freakydallas13
Registered User
The jokes practically write themselves.If I were defending the Flyers
The jokes practically write themselves.If I were defending the Flyers
No defense can fix that giant 5-hole on FedotovEveryone harping about our goalies drives me crazy. Errsson is well below a save percentage of .900
Fedotov has played what 10 games in the nhl?
And Kolosov sure is lighting up the AHL.
Stabilize the D first then we shall see what happens in goal
The stars are aligning, Vliddo.
The stars are aligning, Vliddo.
If Michkov is 160 lbs, then my ass is a banjo.
I think he wants to move Hathaway up b/c Flyers don't go to the net and set screens for dirty goals.
Couts did so and that resulted in two PP goals.
But they rarely have a man in front of the net 5x5, which means lots of easy saves.
Hathaway has speed and size, concrete hands but he's not afraid to mix it up in front of the net.
The real problem is the forward group is undersized:
Couts, Foerster, Hathaway and Tippett are the only full sized forwards.
Foerster has potential in that role, but is inexperienced.
Tippett plays "small," relies on his speed and shot and doesn't use his body on a regular basis.
Couts has always been more of a finesse guy on offense.
Deslauriers has the size and grit for the role, but he's a liability in any other role, so if you dress him, it should primarily be for O-zone faceoffs where he goes to the net.
Gauither has the size for that role, but I think he'll end up similar to Tippett, a big shooting forward who doesn't spend a lot of time in the dirty areas. You only need one "Tippett."
Hathaway does not help the top 6 score goals.
They've made plenty of cross ice passes this year.I can't even figure out how Hathaway setting screens is supposed to help make more goals with their playstyle. They keep the puck in the same half of the ice overall. The goalie knows where everyone is. There is not going to be any sudden shift where opposing goalies have to take stock of Flyers locations and manage it while having sight impaired. All it would do is get Hathaway hit by shots.
They've made plenty of cross ice passes this year.
Problem is they haven't made plenty of SUCCESSFUL cross ice passes.
If your players can't execute, the next option is to execute your players.
Not really, no.Flahr is doing just fine
They've made plenty of cross ice passes this year.
Problem is they haven't made plenty of SUCCESSFUL cross ice passes.
If your players can't execute, the next option is to execute your players.
Huh? What. These are the players they had.I would be shocked if anything that tracks this doesn't have them near the bottom of the league.
These are the players Tortorella wanted. The players didn't assemble themselves. Why are we blaming them? Perhaps for the first time you should ponder blaming management for failing every year.
Not really, no.
Don't forget the great process of trading up and losing extra picks in the middle rounds where it's a known value loss to do it that way.Depends. Is passing on Perreault for Bonk improving on Stankoven for Tuomaala? Buium for Luchanko? Boldy for York? He’s remarkably consistent so it’s up for interpretation whether or not Flahr is improving.
Yeah the d has been terrible. We have 2 Top 4 D and the rest are 5-6-7s. Where is our defense whisperer?Everyone harping about our goalies drives me crazy. Errsson is well below a save percentage of .900
Fedotov has played what 10 games in the nhl?
And Kolosov sure is lighting up the AHL.
Stabilize the D first then we shall see what happens in goal
Huh? What. These are the players they had.
The only players added since Briere took over are Poehling, Hathaway and Drysdale.
Seeler was already here.
The only player Briere drafted who is here is Michkov (Luchanko is probably headed out of town).
He's made no effort to spend assets to improve the team, it's called "rebuilding."
He's used cap room to garner more draft picks, not players.
I'd say Boldy v York and Brink is fine.Depends. Is passing on Perreault for Bonk improving on Stankoven for Tuomaala? Buium for Luchanko? Boldy for York? He’s remarkably consistent so it’s up for interpretation whether or not Flahr is improving.
Name me a rebuilding team with fewer 30+ players (among the 20 who play) than the Flyers.Truly, no other players have been shed at Tortorella's behest. Truly.
They are not rebuilding. Never have been. Never will be. Their actions don't match a rebuild. Their president admitted they lied about rebuilding. Their actions match that. Always have.
I'd say Boldy v York and Brink is fine.
We'll see how Perreault does at the NHL level.
Same with Buium and Luchanko.
Name me a rebuilding team with fewer 30+ players (among the 20 who play) than the Flyers.
Flahr is doing just fine, better since Fletcher left the room.
This is the 2nd year of what is probably a 5 year rebuild, by 2017-18 they should start to be competitive.
So far I have no problem with their drafts, especially seeing their D+1 seasons.
Flahr is doing just fine, better since Fletcher left the room.
This is the 2nd year of what is probably a 5 year rebuild, by 2017-18 they should start to be competitive.
So far I have no problem with their drafts, especially seeing their D+1 seasons.
I'd say Boldy v York and Brink is fine.
We'll see how Perreault does at the NHL level.
Same with Buium and Luchanko.
They didn’t trade the Boldy pick for York and Brink. They traded it for York + 45. Still the best (non-ideal) move of the bunch I listed. Can I say that Boldy is likely worth more than both anyway (as Brink still gets scratched)? I can play that game too. How about Boldy + Hoglander + Maccelli is > York + Brink? They didn’t even have their original 41st pick because of Braun.
You just said Flahr has improved. Now, it’s wait and see? He’s continuing to make major OOF picks without hindsight, passing on star after star, while banking on a rebuild philosophy that needs to nail non-gimme picks. But be my guest, use the wait and see approach for your opinions too.