Last two seasons, Flyer D-men with 1000+ 5x5 minutes (SVA):
Sanheim 17:44, xGF% 48.73%, xGFrel -0.75, xGA/60: 2.54
York 16:58, xGF% 45.57%, xGFrel +0.97, xGA/60: 2.39
Walker 15:58, xGF% 56.18%, xGFrel +6.23, xGA/60: 2.37
Risto 15:15, xGF% 50.27%, xGFrel +2.33, xGA/60: 2.34
Seeler 13:53, xGF% 50.11%, xGFrel +4.35, xGA/60: 2.33
Zamula 13:49, xGF% 48.12%, xGFrel -3.60, xGA/60: 2.32
TDA 16:44, xGF% 44.09%, xGFrel -3.81, xGA/60: 3.30
Provorov 18:23, xGF% 45.25%, xGFrel -3.36, xGA/60: 2.83
Pairs:
York - Sanheim, 1160, xGF% 50.60%, xGFrel -0.75, xGA/60: 2.44
Seeler - Walker, 642, xGF% 56.72%, xGFrel +5.94, xGA/60: 2.44
Provorov - York, 548, xGF% 50.10%, xGFrel +0.94, xGA/60: 2.53
Sanheim - Risto, 471, xGF% 45.27%, xGFrel -3.98, xGA/60: 2.48
Provorov - TDA, 436, xGF% 39.84%, xGFrel -7.70, xGA/60: 3.60
Seeler - Risto, 373, xGF% 56.01%, xGFrel +8.06, xGA/60: 2.01
Sanheim - Braun, 333, xGF% 51.10, xGFrel +3.98, xGA/60: 2.10
Sanheim - TDA, 331, xGF% 39.58, xGFrel -7.80, xGA/60, 3.31
While Provorov played better in CBJ than the year before, he was still at a second pair level.
TDA was putrid. Dragged every partner down.
Seeler raises his partner's play, even raised TDA's play relative to other pairings.
Shows the value of a stay at home D-man who can CYA for a partner. See Braun as well.
I think the ideal pairing is an offensive D-man with a mobile, physical defensive D-man. A fundamentally sound partner who can get back allows offensive D-men to be more aggressive.
Not sure how much of Sanheim's improvement last year was health, playing RHD or the pairing with York.
Risto was much better with Seeler and better with Zamula than he was with Sanheim.
Maybe just bad chemistry.