Pez68
Registered User
Signing Marner would be like Toronto signing Tavares. NO.
First five years were pretty good. Their window got hosed by COVIDSigning Marner would be like Toronto signing Tavares. NO.
Their window got hosed by having too many forwards making too much money.First five years were pretty good. Their window got hosed by COVID
Well, of course but BWC is right. Hawks need more offense from a few sources. Dickinson, Hall, Bertuzzi, Kurashev, Reichel and Jones all come to mind who need to be more productive.It probably just means that Ryan Donato's 50 goal in 80 game pace is not sustainable.
True. Probably a larger issue. Overpaying RFA’s really cost them in depthTheir window got hosed by having too many forwards making too much money.
Signing Marner would be like Toronto signing Tavares. NO.
Adding to this, I’m pretty sure Hossa was the only if not one of very few free agent stories where they signed and lived up to the contract/level of play. There’s a lot of variables in what makes a player successful, including systems and how they integrate with fellow players the team they move to is built around.
Can anyone name a 4 UFA’s outside of Hossa that put a team over the edge and into cup contention?
I will say, I'd be shocked if we turned into the next Maple Leafs, even if we signed someone like Marner.
Toronto's problem is a lack of D on the team. They might be allocating a ton to that forward group, but the best defender they managed to draft and developed turned out to be Morgan Reilly, who is a gigantic let down if he's your best defenseman. After that, what do they really have on defense? Our old buddy McCabe, who I think most here would agree is a solid middle pairing guy and a past his prime OEL.
Hawks have a number of defensive prospects who should turn out better than the trash the Leafs are icing on their back end every night. And I'd argue that Vlasic, right now, is better than any of their defenders.
14 points in 37 playoffs games and from everything I’ve read, Jets fans are usually annoyed as shit with his playI have my eye on Ehlers.
Very much agree with this, but the worry is that if we sign those high dollar FA forwards we won't be able to afford our own defensemen when they're up for the big raises.
Then we could turn into Toronto. But luckily I think the FO is showing very proactive cap management planning so far, so we should be fine.
He made it to UFA in Tampa and then looked around and resigned back in Tampa previously when he was still elite.Stamkos wasnt elite either once he left Tampa
Banking on a next "Hossa" signing to fill a star forward slot would be pretty poor managing. Like you said, it rarely happens and usually those guys have a very particular destination in mind
Except we have 1 elite forward talent in Bedard and not 3 in Marner Nylander and Matthews. So nothing like it.Signing Marner would be like Toronto signing Tavares. NO.
Foligno isn't going anywhere, and I doubt Mikheyev is either.Hawks have 15.25M in cap space tied up in Hall, Foligno, and Mikheyev. Give me a star in Marner for a 12M next year and you still have 3.25M to spare to fill in the other two roster spots. Your team is now significantly better and most importantly Bedard now has an incredible linemate.
Foligno isn't going anywhere, and I doubt Mikheyev is either.
How 'bout Athanasiou and Hall?Foligno isn't going anywhere, and I doubt Mikheyev is either.
Yeah, I mean they're still a terrible roster, so yeah Marner + x + x is a better use of cap space today, but it's not like it's next year or bust.It was more of an example of how much we're spending on bad production currently in comparison to what Marner will make.
The Hawks can easily make room for Marner's contract without any significant pieces after this season. Hall will drop off and I think they have like 9M in space as is with no significant raises for next year.
But yes, I am expecting both of them to be on the roster next year as well.
I could see Hall being back on a cheaper deal, but yeah, AA is as good as gone.How 'bout Athanasiou and Hall?