- Aug 24, 2011
- 28,416
- 13,328
This is a bottom 4 team even if Bedard puts up 100 points. Hall and Brodie are just recognizable names at this point.
If he puts up 50+pts on that 2nd line, he may be worth the money. I don't see that happening though.We probably should be pumping up Kurashev to move at the deadline too. With a 54 point season on his resume and arbitration eligible next Summer, my guess is his agent starts the conversation at 6 million per if he sniffs 50 points again.
Silly me. All this time I thought this was a message board.Why are y'all making up scenarios?
He is, but Kurashev won't be commanding 5+mil unless he does put up 50+pts on his own line. That's not happening, and if it does, it means he improved big time and would be worth a short term 5+mil.and you're delusional in general, so i guess it evens out.
100% it's no longer one of the worst of the cap era, but still really crappyThis is a bottom 4 team even if Bedard puts up 100 points. Hall and Brodie are just recognizable names at this point.
i have no dog in this fight besides seeing musto insulted for one reason or another. if he ends up being wrong it's just bonus points.He is, but Kurashev won't be commanding 5+mil unless he does put up 50+pts on his own line. That's not happening, and if it does, it means he improved big time and would be worth a short term 5+mil.
In a world where Seth Jones makes 9.5, a 50 point Kurashev running his own line is worth 5.
So coming off a 25 point season an arbitrator hands Kurashev 2.25 per when the cap is 83.5 and he is going to take 4 (or leave it lol) with the cap at 92 million and a 56 point season on his resume....math is really hard.Why are y'all making up scenarios?
He's not getting overpaid lol.
He'll be offered 4M at most. Take it or leave it.
He doesn't have leverage.
And there won't be a late 1st round pick on the table for him.
They're not going to arbitration with KurashevSo coming off a 25 point season an arbitrator hands Kurashev 2.25 per when the cap is 83.5 and he is going to take 4 (or leave it lol) with the cap at 92 million and a 56 point season on his resume....math is really hard.
No, it means none of it matters considering, you know, he was a 40 goal, first line player at the time of the trade.if by irrelevant you mean inconvenient for you, yes.
First time ever seeing an Asst. coach get credit for coaching a team to a Cup Final. lol, nor am I buying into the whole "it's Luke Richardsons fault" hate brigade when the guy coached a pathetic Habs team to a Cup final.
They'll either trade him, or let him go if he is demanding that much, before it gets to arbitration.So coming off a 25 point season an arbitrator hands Kurashev 2.25 per when the cap is 83.5 and he is going to take 4 (or leave it lol) with the cap at 92 million and a 56 point season on his resume....math is really hard.
This won't age well if I posted a link.....First time ever seeing an Asst. coach get credit for coaching a team to a Cup Final. lol
You could have stopped at JFieldsOverBedard to make your point but the last part on old enough to drink brings the post home.JFieldsOverBedard is is just being contrarian because he's not a Blackhawks fan who pretends to be a Blackhawks fan so that he can antagonize people on this board. Even main board haters would say the DeBrincat trade was good for the Hawks. He turns 27 before the calendar year turns over and his production has declined. Even if they still got Bedard (less likely if DeBrincat and Hagel are around), age wise DeBrincat wouldn't fit into the rebuild from a timing perspective as he's already on a UFA deal. Of course his production post trade is relevant for assessing the trade. If he puts up back to back 100 point seasons, that means he was being undervalued by the Hawks, as is, he was being overvalued by Ottawa. And nobody that isn't a complete fool would write off the 7th and 39th picks in the 2022 Draft and 3rd round pick in the 2024 Draft before those players are even old enough to legally drink in the U.S.