2024-25 Roster…too soon?

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.

New player numbers. KK is moving back to #14, the number he wore in Seattle, giving Lev #55. Reichel is switching numbers too (going with his number from Germany), which is interesting considering that JR is going into the Hall.

Honestly feel like Seabs, JR and co should not be retired. We already have like 8 at this point with 19,88, and 2 already set to join. Have to up the standards a bit
 
Honestly feel like Seabs, JR and co should not be retired. We already have like 8 at this point with 19,88, and 2 already set to join. Have to up the standards a bit

I mean.. #7 is already retired for Chelios. Don't think it'll be a big issue if Seabs shares that same number in retirement. Dude played his entire 15 year career here. Over 1100 games, 3 cups, 4 time all star, Alternate captain, etc. If anything Seabrook is most deserving of it over Roenick and even Hossa.
 
I mean.. #7 is already retired for Chelios. Don't think it'll be a big issue if Seabs shares that same number in retirement. Dude played his entire 15 year career here. Over 1100 games, 3 cups, 4 time all star, Alternate captain, etc. If anything Seabrook is most deserving of it over Roenick and even Hossa.

Man that Hossa jersey retirement is just going to look so dumb in hindsight. It was dumb at the time. We all love Hoss but he only spent 40% of his career here and he was out of prime for more than half those games.

If Hossa gets his jersey retired after 534 games as a Hawk, it's tough to argue against any of the other 3-time Cup winners, or guys like Roenick, Wilson and Larmer. Next thing you know the Hawks are going to have 15+ retired numbers. Starts to become silly really.

1, 3, 7, 9, 18, 21, 35 and 81 already retired.

2, 19 and 88 slam-dunks to be retired over the next 5 years.

Cases to be made for 4, 10, 24, 27 and 28.
 
I mean.. #7 is already retired for Chelios. Don't think it'll be a big issue if Seabs shares that same number in retirement. Dude played his entire 15 year career here. Over 1100 games, 3 cups, 4 time all star, Alternate captain, etc. If anything Seabrook is most deserving of it over Roenick and even Hossa.
Hall of Fame and they had to spend the majority of their time here vs playing outside of Chicago is how they should do it imo.

Personally not a fan of Hossa being retired either since he spent the vast majority of his career elsewhere even if he had more games and more years in Chicago vs any of Ottawa, Atlanta, Detroit on an individual basis.

Also it’s pretty silly to me we have 6 cups and 11 retired numbers (I’m counting Toews Kane and Keith already) when Detroit has 11 cups and only 8 retired numbers.

Don’t want to be like the Rangers and have a ton of retired numbers for players who didn’t need their number retired
 
Last edited:
Hall of Fame and they had to spend the majority of their time here vs playing outside of Chicago is how they should do it imo.

Personally not a fan of Hossa being retired either since he spent the vast majority of his career elsewhere even if he had more games and more years in Chicago vs any of Ottawa, Atlanta, Detroit on an individual basis.

Also it’s pretty silly to me we have 6 cups and 11 retired numbers (I’m counting Toews Kane and Keith already) when Detroit has 11 cups and only 8 retired numbers.

Don’t want to be like the Rangers and have a ton of retired numbers for players who didn’t need their number retired
Honest question, who would you take away from having their numbers retired? Most of the guys who have them retired are award winners and hall of famers in the NHL, or cup champions or all three.

The only arguments I could possibly see are Roenick and Hossa. The Red Wings thing isn’t really an issue. It just shows that despite both teams being around for over one hundred years, they truly sucked for a long time. That’s why neither team has many numbers retired.
 
Honest question, who would you take away from having their numbers retired? Most of the guys who have them retired are award winners and hall of famers in the NHL, or cup champions or all three.

The only arguments I could possibly see are Roenick and Hossa. The Red Wings thing isn’t really an issue. It just shows that despite both teams being around for over one hundred years, they truly sucked for a long time. That’s why neither team has many numbers retired.
Mainly Hossa and Roenick if that happens.

I do not feel Seabrook, Sharp, Hjalmarsson, Crawford should be retired either. All of the above could easily be in a ring of honor of some sort but I feel number retirements should be the greatest and those in the hall of fame (with Magnusson being a bit of an exception).
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawksDub89
Hossa is in HOF and people will remember him as Hawk and his career's defining moments were as a Hawk

His # going up is more than reasonable

The fact #24 has not gone up needs to be addressed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Styles
Hossa is in HOF and people will remember him as Hawk and his career's defining moments were as a Hawk

His # going up is more than reasonable

The fact #24 has not gone up needs to be addressed
Maybe he should try to make some step up to thr organization. Sure nobody is around that was at the top but his 2010 offseason moves were seen as spiteful.

Chelios made ammends and worked with the team to earn it. Will Wilson do that? He works for Pittsburgh now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giovi
The worst timeline. Stan probably picks a dman trying to replace Hammer but he couldn't pick dmen for shit until the very end of his tenure.

Even if we got a first the sharks made the WCF in 2011 the best dman at that range was Scott Mayfield and Adam Clendenning. Would have been an all time oof
 

Ad

Ad

Please disable your adblocker on HFBoards.com

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support us by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.