Hawkaholic
Registered User
Still worth his contractHe's one of the team's few 3rd liners, yeah.
Still worth his contractHe's one of the team's few 3rd liners, yeah.
He's serviceable as a third wheel on a top 6 line. He's like a poor man's Hagel.He's one of the team's few 3rd liners, yeah.
That's the Toronto sports press hoping aloud for a better than abysmal return for Marner.Now what?: 57 stray thoughts on the Toronto Maple Leafs
Here are 57 stray observations on the team that was and what might be — one for every year since the parade.www.sportsnet.ca
Another mention of Seth Jones in an article regarding the Maple Leafs. Can’t help but wonder of these “tidbits” are based on something being heard through the grapevine. Point 44 for those interested.
That a definite win trade…SKA likely offering more money and certainly offering a bigger role than anything in the NHL, not looking to wait until July 1st just to kick the tires. Old enough that there's no true upside to hanging around near waiver fodder level, so it all makes sense for Zaitsev.
Yes, Ottawa dumped Zaitsev's deal to give them room to trade more picks for Chychrun and fit him in under cap. There is a chance Chychrun ends up walking, and Ottawa still hasn't made the Playoffs.That a definite win trade…
Zaitsev played 58 for the Hawks as a serviceable dman, Chicago also acquired a 2nd(Roman Kantserov) in 2023 and still another asset in a 4th in 2026 which could still be a top 100 pick…
Ottawa lost that deal
I saw the typical insanely optimistic TOR media article where they mentioned Korchinski/Moore/20th OA for Marner and almost passed out. Even for TOR media that's just a insane deal.That's the Toronto sports press hoping aloud for a better than abysmal return for Marner.
The likelihood that both Jones and Marner waive to facilitate a trade where they exchange teams is almost zero.
I saw the typical insanely optimistic TOR media article where they mentioned Korchinski/Moore/20th OA for Marner and almost passed out Even for TOR media that's just a insane deal.
100% agreed. IMO, the Hawks perspective would be doing the Leafs a favor by taking on $11M cap hit for 1 year of MM. The deal that was proposed was so insane that I was just shocked. Any MM deal with the Hawks would be predicated on what the Hawks think they could get for MM with retention at the trade deadline.For what? A good player with 1 year left so the team can still miss the playoffs.....KD can improve the team without giving up the hard earned prospects he has accrued.
It seems like Mrazek and Necas are pretty good friends. Hopefully he can get Necas over here to play with Bedard.
20th and Reichel for Necas signed 8x7.5. Necas years 25/26-33/34 years old. 25-30 goals 30-45 assists. Speed Size and Compete with another level he can get to.f*** that!
Seriously he is not worth the cost in assets to acquire him and the awful contract he wants (8 x $8M)
I see some fans who want the 2nd overall pick and then some. Makes it hard to root for themI saw the typical insanely optimistic TOR media article where they mentioned Korchinski/Moore/20th OA for Marner and almost passed out. Even for TOR media that's just a insane deal.
Necas isn’t anything more than an average middle 6 complimentary piece. Trading away young assets for someone like this and then handing them 8mil a year for 8 years is the type of move that will derail a rebuild. Like when LA traded Faber for Fiala.
Reichels absolute top would be a good piece like Necas. Bedard is your most important asset. Surrounding him with trash again can not happen for his development. Having to carry the offense like that game in and game out is a problem.Necas isn’t anything more than an average middle 6 complimentary piece. Trading away young assets for someone like this and then handing them 8mil a year for 8 years is the type of move that will derail a rebuild. Like when LA traded Faber for Fiala.
I assume you're kidding because that would be a really silly move. You can literally wait a couple years and sign a Martin Necas level player for "free" (i.e., cap space). No idea why people are hellbent on trading draft capital for mid-20s guys a few years from UFA age while the Hawks still suck.20th and Reichel for Necas signed 8x7.5. Necas years 25/26-33/34 years old. 25-30 goals 30-45 assists. Speed Size and Compete with another level he can get to.
Sign me up.
Demidov-Bedard-Necas
So you could have one Necas and sign another, or if he's worse, a worse than Necas and still sign a Necas. To anyone familiar with the NHL, teams draft and develop players, the good ones develop into quality well-priced RFA players that provide really good Middle Six value. They approach their UFA years, price themselves out and go sign on a new team with a need.Reichels absolute top would be a good piece like Necas.
Whos going to play with Bedard for these next 3 years? Or you dont think him playing with quality players matter?So you could have one Necas and sign another, or if he's worse, a worse than Necas and still sign a Necas. To anyone familiar with the NHL, teams draft and develop players, the good ones develop into quality well-priced RFA players that provide really good Middle Six value. They approach their UFA years, price themselves out and go sign on a new team with a need.
Or if they become superstars, they are extended 8-years and there's no talk of ever acquiring them to begin with because their team prioritized extending them through UFA years.
There is little reason to be premature and try and capture the "quality middle six" RFA players via trading your own picks while rebuilding unless you think you're a piece or two away. You draft and develop your own, and then you supplement with UFA signings with your cap space.
UFA and/or see who emerges. Bedard had 0.897 PPG as an 18 year old on a Dumpster Fire roster. He's gonna be fine. The goal can be to improve the Dumpster Fire aspect without throwing caution and patience to the wind.Whos going to play with Bedard for these next 3 years? Or you dont think him playing with quality players matter?
Whos the UFA? Nobody thats going to be here long term.UFA and/or see who emerges. Bedard had 0.897 PPG as an 18 year old on a Dumpster Fire roster. He's gonna be fine. The goal can be to improve the Dumpster Fire aspect without throwing caution and patience to the wind.
Sorry, is it 3 years or long term now?Whos the UFA? Nobody thats going to be here long term.
That is quite literally what a rebuild is.The plan is to hope somebody emerges? Thats not a plan.
And put a big ol' cap on that.Instead of hoping Reichel emerges and then pay him in 2 years for his emergence you can trade him for a proven talent.
You can do one and you can do the other, you shouldn't try to halfway both simultaneously.Surround your most important asset while they develop and have someone who will be around when you compete.
25 is not that young for wingers. Reichel is 3.5 years younger, but people have written the book on him already it seems...Its just as much about Bedard as it is Necas. I also think Necas can be a PPG player. Hes 25!
Necas would be here long term dont know what you are saying-Sorry, is it 3 years or long term now?
That is quite literally what a rebuild is.
And put a big ol' cap on that.
You can do one and you can do the other, you shouldn't try to halfway both simultaneously.
25 is not that young for wingers.