2024-25 Kraken Roster discussion
- Thread starter Fistfullofbeer
- Start date
Scomerica
Registered User
Fistfullofbeer
Moderator
Fistfullofbeer
Moderator
Stranger things have happened. But I just don't see how a competing team would trade for him.
Fuhrious
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2004
- 1,817
- 1,473
Yeah I think any hope for a trade would require a decent bit of desperation from the receiving team, which Carolina may or may not be feeling, and equally how much retention Francis and his superiors are willing to absorb in a deal.
Given the Kraken have never really done a retention deal, it’s hard to know where they land on it?
With the stuff about Gourde earlier today, it’s hard to shake the vibe that they’re still running this team as a marketing endeavor rather than a serious Stanley Cup pursuit?
Fistfullofbeer
Moderator
That did run through my head too. I would not be shocked if the reasoning is, "Yanni is a leader. The fans love him."
The Marquis
Moderator
What stuff about Gourde? I don’t see anything in the real news. Trade rumors? Discontent? Low ball offer from club?
RainyCityHockey
Registered User
The Eberle news suck and it's even "at least three months" according to the news by the team.
Well, like I've said before.
If this team's anywhere near the playoff picture I wouldn't be surprised if they kept him.
And if you do that, you probably want to extend him to not lose him for nothing.
Though, it doesn't really make any sense given his age, dip in productaion and, like you've said, with all those forwards getting closer to the NHL down in CV.
But given how this team has operated and what Francis has said(make the playoffs every year) I'm not that surprised cause the plan seems to be to be "competitive" ending up as a playoff bubble team(unless some crazy trade happens or a prospect or two goes through the roof) for the foreseable future.
Sure.
It's just that the other side has a pretty good laugh about it.
Especially the Canes, who're not throwing out money on anything especially goaltending.
On top of that Gru's injury prone himself and they don't need more goalies like that.
Elliotte Friedman has said that the team probably wants to keep and re-sign him.
www.sportsnet.ca
Well, like I've said before.
If this team's anywhere near the playoff picture I wouldn't be surprised if they kept him.
And if you do that, you probably want to extend him to not lose him for nothing.
Though, it doesn't really make any sense given his age, dip in productaion and, like you've said, with all those forwards getting closer to the NHL down in CV.
But given how this team has operated and what Francis has said(make the playoffs every year) I'm not that surprised cause the plan seems to be to be "competitive" ending up as a playoff bubble team(unless some crazy trade happens or a prospect or two goes through the roof) for the foreseable future.
Sure.
It's just that the other side has a pretty good laugh about it.
Especially the Canes, who're not throwing out money on anything especially goaltending.
On top of that Gru's injury prone himself and they don't need more goalies like that.
Elliotte Friedman has said that the team probably wants to keep and re-sign him.
32 Thoughts: Why the Bruins fired Jim Montgomery and what's next
After the Bruins failed to show consistent "pushback" it was time to make a change behind the bench. Plus, where the salary cap could go next, thoughts on the trade market, and more in this week's notes.
The Marquis
Moderator
If Gourde can play 4th line and at the level he’s at for 2 more years and at a discount, I’m down.
Fuhrious
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2004
- 1,817
- 1,473
He'd be insane to do either of those things (sign for only 2 years, or take a discount)
Leaf-fan here! What is take of Seattle fans on Gourde, is he someone you'd be willing to part with? For what kind of price?
Toronto would most likely need a heavy retention, up to 50% - with salary coming back, again most likely Kämpf... who although is still very serviceable and a really good 4th line, 100% defensive + shorthanded situation player, makes a bit too much to be playing in a contending teams fourth line.
What are Seattle's needs? For example, Toronto has Niemelä, who is very nearly ready for NHL duty, a puck-moving defenceman who is a very good skater. Perhaps a pick on top of him and Kämpf?
Toronto would most likely need a heavy retention, up to 50% - with salary coming back, again most likely Kämpf... who although is still very serviceable and a really good 4th line, 100% defensive + shorthanded situation player, makes a bit too much to be playing in a contending teams fourth line.
What are Seattle's needs? For example, Toronto has Niemelä, who is very nearly ready for NHL duty, a puck-moving defenceman who is a very good skater. Perhaps a pick on top of him and Kämpf?
The Marquis
Moderator
Fuhrious
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2004
- 1,817
- 1,473
Yeah exactly, something Utah does that I wish Francis / Hakstol / Bylsma would do? Play the kids, especially if your "greasy" vets are gonna come out flat every time they play a team with a winning record. Play. The. Kids.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)- Latest: DanielBrassard
-
-
