2024-25 General Dallas Stars Talk

starsfan86

Registered User
Sep 27, 2006
4,818
3,575
Anyone else think we should trade Robo before his contract expires? Could probably get a decent package for him and I doubt he’s going to be worth what he’ll ask for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dallasman

Troy McClure

Should’ve drafted Makar
Mar 12, 2002
48,950
16,871
South of Heaven
Anyone else think we should trade Robo before his contract expires? Could probably get a decent package for him and I doubt he’s going to be worth what he’ll ask for.
Even if this was the smart move in terms of projected future production vs cap hit math and asset management, the reality is the Stars are trying to win now. Downgrading the roster now for lottery tickets you might see pay off four years from now isn't something Gaglardi or Nill will go for.
 

starsfan86

Registered User
Sep 27, 2006
4,818
3,575
Even if this was the smart move in terms of projected future production vs cap hit math and asset management, the reality is the Stars are trying to win now. Downgrading the roster now for lottery tickets you might see pay off four years from now isn't something Gaglardi or Nill will go for.
True. At the same time, he needs to produce at more than a .58 ppg for us to win now.
 

M88K

irreverent
May 24, 2014
9,827
7,990
Hintz is a bigger problem than Robertson is today.
Guy missed camp from surgery he's going to be a little behind.
Hintz just flat out sucks now
 
  • Like
Reactions: redbeardtx

Troy McClure

Should’ve drafted Makar
Mar 12, 2002
48,950
16,871
South of Heaven
True. At the same time, he needs to produce at more than a .58 ppg for us to win now.
I think we're learning Pavelski was a much bigger contributor to their production than was previously realized. The Pavelski from two seasons ago was so great, and the top line was so great as a result. The struggle now is with how the top line has both unimpressive numbers but also just doesn't look as dangerous.

Tracking this with numbers is tough, but looking at Hintz and Robertson, their high danger scoring chances at 5v5 were both at 15.8 per 60 minutes two seasons ago (both the best on the Stars) while this season the numbers have dropped to 12.1 and 12.9 respectively. Comparing them to the rest of the team now using the same metric, they are 11th and 9th among forwards. Ugh.

I'm sure they're still figuring out chemistry playing without Pavelski, but these are also supposed to be the team's two best forwards. But if this continues and Stars brass starts to doubt Robertson's ability to be an offensive driver without Pavelski, the contract talks could hit a very serious impass.
 

Azzuri

Registered User
Feb 6, 2017
685
773
Is it Pavelski or just Hintz's natural decline? His game was never one that was going to age well. I remember being skeptical of the long term deal he signed at the time due to his injury history.
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,014
4,057
Well Stank is a straight upgrade on Pavs so I don't think it's that, although the lines have been unsettled. It doesn't help that the PP sucks and they're not picking up points there.
 

LT

Global Moderator
Jul 23, 2010
42,474
14,152
Well Stank is a straight upgrade on Pavs so I don't think it's that, although the lines have been unsettled. It doesn't help that the PP sucks and they're not picking up points there.

I think your second point here is the crux of the issue

It will correct itself
 

BerthMania

Registered User
Jun 3, 2022
315
293
Montréal
I was just looking at the Stars stats and I was super surprised. Duchene and Seguin are the 2 best point producers. Are they also the best players on the ice? Particularly Duchene, how is he producing at the highest pace of his career at 33 years old?
 

piqued

nos merentur hoc
Nov 22, 2006
33,014
4,057
Marchment-Duchene-Seguin has been a productive line for 2 seasons now.

Duchene and Seguin had instant chemistry as soon as Duchene arrived.

Duchene is also one of our few players who has any idea what he's doing on the PP.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad