I think Fowler is bringing us forward help in a future deal
The point is that we are taking mins away from players who deserve it. I don't believe Fowler deserves to play here anymore.LOLOL I read it on the Tkachuk to NY thread and I guess my brain just read Tkachuk.
Ya obviously Trouba would be free.
They play completely different roles.
I could see an argument be made that the roster with Trouba is better then the roster with Fowler, even though Fowler is clearly better.
100% - we have to move Fowler + in order to get an impact forward. Preferably one who wins faceoffs or score goals.I think Fowler is bringing us forward help in a future deal
Fowler traded and LaCombe slots in, Dumo flipped at the TDL and Helleson slots in is my guessso how does the defense work now?
mintyukov gudas
zellwegwe trouba
fowler dumo
We gunna sit helleson and lacombe?
Cheering proud emojiThe thing is, trouba is a legitimate NHL player and we have a roster that needs legitimate NHL players. I do not care if the Rangers, a perineal division winner, are a little less than enthused with his play. We have a different standard here right now, we just need some competence.
Every night we lose battles in the crease against bigger teams. It's crazy to think that trouba wouldn't help there immensely.
If they are violent, yes.
Rangers: masters of the episiotomy.I do not care if the Rangers, a perineal division winner, are a little less than enthused with his play.
My subconscious on another level.Rangers: masters of the episiotomy.
happens to the best of us, taint no thingMy subconscious on another level.
I think those that are worried about our young D getting "pushed out" are worried about nothing.
Minty got sat over Helleson and Lacombe. Thats tells me they sat him for a reason, or reasons. Its no different than what theyve done with our forwards. Could be anything from missing assignments to just giving him a rest.
Helleson has surprised us all, but its not going to hurt him to get some notes and go back to SD for a while.
Vaaks was a 6/7 guy who couldnt stay in the lineup.
Lacombe is fringe. Hes on a hot streak right now and improving, but hes also had stretches where hes a dud.
Zell is the only young D right now who looks like a guy you cant sit.
Fowler and Dumo are question marks. One is when they get moved and the other is if they get moved.
Trouba/Zell
Fowler/Minty
Gudas/Dumo
Lacombe
Helleson
Send Helleson down for now. Lacombe to the pressbox once he starts struggling again. Fowler traded gets Lacombe back in and then someone like Helleson is recalled to play the merry-go-round with Lacombe in and out of the lineup.
They are building, were going to see some weirdness with the pairings and roster until they can get everything flushed out.
sorry best we can do is over play the older guysRotate the old guys... the young ones need ice time, the old ones need to ice their muscles
Hopefully, especially if Zegras is out long term.I think Fowler is bringing us forward help in a future deal
Lacombe may be a bit of a wildcard in terms of occasional high profile gaffs, but he's actually been pretty darn good. His talent level or toolkit is well above fringe and he'll only gain consistency by playing.
Fowler isn’t a question mark, he’s not a verbeek player. He’s small, and he’s already been asked to open up his ntc so we have more teams to trade too. It’s inevitable. As far as verbeek is concerned zell is the only midget he would like on the blue line. Fowler plays a 5’5 mans game.I think those that are worried about our young D getting "pushed out" are worried about nothing.
Minty got sat over Helleson and Lacombe. Thats tells me they sat him for a reason, or reasons. Its no different than what theyve done with our forwards. Could be anything from missing assignments to just giving him a rest.
Helleson has surprised us all, but its not going to hurt him to get some notes and go back to SD for a while.
Vaaks was a 6/7 guy who couldnt stay in the lineup.
Lacombe is fringe. Hes on a hot streak right now and improving, but hes also had stretches where hes a dud.
Zell is the only young D right now who looks like a guy you cant sit.
Fowler and Dumo are question marks. One is when they get moved and the other is if they get moved.
Trouba/Zell
Fowler/Minty
Gudas/Dumo
Lacombe
Helleson
Send Helleson down for now. Lacombe to the pressbox once he starts struggling again. Fowler traded gets Lacombe back in and then someone like Helleson is recalled to play the merry-go-round with Lacombe in and out of the lineup.
They are building, were going to see some weirdness with the pairings and roster until they can get everything flushed out.
Fowler isn’t a question mark, he’s not a verbeek player. He’s small, and he’s already been asked to open up his ntc so we have more teams to trade too. It’s inevitable. As far as verbeek is concerned zell is the only midget he would like on the blue line. Fowler plays a 5’5 mans game.
Dumo has been solid. For sureI get all of that, what I'm saying is it's only a question as to when he gets traded. For Dumo, it's if he gets traded. I've liked Dumo and would welcome him back but if he wants to play on the East coast and wants to win, trade him at the deadline.
It’s mainly due to money. Not only his is cap hit smaller than Trouba’s, but the Ducks should be willing to take a short term bad contract back and/or retain salary. If they don’t do either of those things, then I would agree that the return is similar.I question why the people wanting Fowler gone at all costs feel like his return is going to be any different than the forward equivalent of Vaakanainen and a late 4th. A return for him is not improving the team significantly unless he plays enough (and well enough) to see if he can still play.