Prospect Info: 2024-25 Ducks Prospects

[Webster]

I don't understand the coddling reply for Solberg, especially when I wrote, "Solberg is just 18-years old in a top men's league (SHL). This year is a year to develop his game as well as consistency." You are reiterating what I said.

Here is my post about Solberg's previous game:


As you can see, I denoted Solberg has the most ice time for the team and was very good that game. The very next game, it was a bad game for Solberg. Just shows the inconsistency of a young player, which we're in agreement of. There is nothing malicious reporting about what actually happened. You can stop with the white knight defense of Solberg when we're both fans of Solberg.

Wow...I just find it funny to see you focus on "fewest TOI" when there are just a few seconds between the players. That's why I said you shouldn't read much into that.

 

[Hockey Duckie]

Wow...I just find it funny to see you focus on "fewest TOI" when there are just a few seconds between the players. That's why I said you shouldn't read much into that.

Going from 19:11 TOI (highest) to 13:36 TOI (lowest among d-men) in back to back games is something funny? But that's just TOI. You completely neglected good play went with the 19:11 TOI and bad play with 13:36 TOI. That identifies inconsistency, albeit at opposite extremes. It is evident you have problem with actual reporting and just what to white knight for Solberg all the time. There is nothing wrong with identifying Solberg had a bad game.

Solberg	Farjestad	2024-25
Game	G	A	Pts	+/-		TOI	SOG	Hits	PIM
1​	0​	0​	0​	-2​		16:01​	1​	2​	0​
2​	0​	0​	0​	-1​		15:35​	0​	1​	0​
3​	0​	0​	0​	1​		19:11​	2​	2​	0​
4​	0​	0​	0​	-2​		13:36​	0​	2​	2​

Again, we're both fans of Solberg, but I actually do want to know how he's been playing. You've hyped up Solberg so much with his most TOI in pre-season to make believe Solberg is a top-pairing D today. But you have toned your schtick down tremendously during the regular season b/c Solberg is a 2nd pairing D. Yet, you want to jump down my throat for identifying a fact that Solberg had the lowest TOI among defensemen and exclude the context that he has been playing 2 minutes or more above that? Don't be hypocrite.

Once again, there's nothing wrong with identifying Solberg had a bad game; the -2 rating and 2 PIM probably justified Solberg losing minutes.

 

[AngelDuck]

Going from 19:11 TOI (highest) to 13:36 TOI (lowest among d-men) in back to back games is something funny? But that's just TOI. You completely neglected good play went with the 19:11 TOI and bad play with 13:36 TOI. That identifies inconsistency, albeit at opposite extremes. It is evident you have problem with actual reporting and just what to white knight for Solberg all the time. There is nothing wrong with identifying Solberg had a bad game.

Solberg	Farjestad	2024-25
Game	G	A	Pts	+/-		TOI	SOG	Hits	PIM
1​	0​	0​	0​	-2​		16:01​	1​	2​	0​
2​	0​	0​	0​	-1​		15:35​	0​	1​	0​
3​	0​	0​	0​	1​		19:11​	2​	2​	0​
4​	0​	0​	0​	-2​		13:36​	0​	2​	2​

Again, we're both fans of Solberg, but I actually do want to know how he's been playing. You've hyped up Solberg so much with his most TOI in pre-season to make believe Solberg is a top-pairing D today. But you have toned your schtick down tremendously during the regular season b/c Solberg is a 2nd pairing D. Yet, you want to jump down my throat for identifying a fact that Solberg had the lowest TOI among defensemen and exclude the context that he has been playing 2 minutes or more above that? Don't be hypocrite.

Once again, there's nothing wrong with identifying Solberg had a bad game; the -2 rating and 2 PIM probably justified Solberg losing minutes.

What is the matter with you? They’re just someone who’s been following Solberg closely that wants to give us as much insight as possible.

Why does it always have to be a never ending argument

 

[SmokeyDuck]

I cant see who is arguing, they must be blocked, but I appreciate the Solberg updates.

 

[ScarTroy]

What is the matter with you? They’re just someone who’s been following Solberg closely that wants to give us as much insight as possible.

Why does it always have to be a never ending argument

And I imagine they are actually watching him live to provide context stats don’t show. @Webster we appreciate the continued insight!