Prospect Info: [2024 - 21st] Michael Hage, Chicago Steel (USHL), Committed to U of Michigan

tazsub3

Registered User
May 30, 2016
5,806
6,298
There's wisdom in what you say.

The moving up in the draft in what at the time was a bit of a vacuum of not knowing who would be available when they picked was a bit puzzling. Sometimes things just work out. Hage has been nothing but impressive in the Prospects Tournament and his first two games at Michigan. His skating ability and offensive vision are eye opening. I earlier stated that Hage reminds me of a bigger Barzal.

Of the three other players you mentioned, I can only comment positively on Vannacker. I never was impressed with Greentree as he has heavy feet which I think will limit his ultimate effectiveness at the NHL level and I haven't seen enough of Hemming to advance an informed opinion. But in my following of Florian Xhekaj's progress with the Bulldogs, I had a chance to watch Vannacker play at least 30 games.

Before the draft, I stated that Vannacker was one of very few players that I would move up for . Vannacker is fast and highly skilled and projects to be a top six forward. I think a lot of teams were sleeping on this player and the fact that he fell near to the bottom of the first round confirmed my belief. The fact that Vannacker was able to be so effective while playing with a damaged shoulder that needed surgical repair made his performance even more impressive.

I think Hughes' failure to again move up in the draft to be in a position to take Vannacker was a missed opportunity. But the fortuitous opportunity to be in a position to draft both Demidov and Hage has a real chance to make the 2024 draft a franchise altering event.

Sometimes its better to be lucky than good.
Well said however the smarter you work , the more luck goes your side .
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
7,884
13,271
Pastrnak fell to like 25…sometimes you gotta get lucky!

Yess. Sometimes teams draft elite talent in late 1st round. If he continue like that, no doubt, Hage have potential to become very special.

Only 2 NCAA game, but we already see his high offensive talent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,052
12,169
There's wisdom in what you say.

The moving up in the draft in what at the time was a bit of a vacuum of not knowing who would be available when they picked was a bit puzzling. Sometimes things just work out. Hage has been nothing but impressive in the Prospects Tournament and his first two games at Michigan. His skating ability and offensive vision are eye opening. I earlier stated that Hage reminds me of a bigger Barzal.

Of the three other players you mentioned, I can only comment positively on Vannacker. I never was impressed with Greentree as he has heavy feet which I think will limit his ultimate effectiveness at the NHL level and I haven't seen enough of Hemming to advance an informed opinion. But in my following of Florian Xhekaj's progress with the Bulldogs, I had a chance to watch Vannacker play at least 30 games.

Before the draft, I stated that Vannacker was one of the very few players that I would have moved up for. Vannacker is fast and highly skilled and projects to be a top six forward. I think a lot of teams were sleeping on this player and the fact that he fell near to the bottom of the first round confirmed my belief. The fact that Vannacker was able to be so effective while playing with a damaged shoulder that needed surgical repair made his performance even more impressive.

I think Hughes' failure to again move up in the draft to be in a position to take Vannacker was a missed opportunity. But the fortuitous opportunity to be in a position to draft both Demidov and Hage has a real chance to make the 2024 draft a franchise altering event.

Sometimes its better to be lucky than good.

You put way too much stock in skating when IQ is an order of magnitude more important. Skating is nice, don't get me wrong but there are tons of examples of elite players who were not great skaters and some of them quite bad skaters. There are zero elite players with low hockey IQ.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdk

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,052
12,169
I think they moved up to 21 because that was the best they could do. And that probably enabled them to set up a trade if Hage was taken.

Hughes already confirmed that the move to 21 was intended to be a step closer to another trade up into the teens as they did not expect Hage to be there. He felt incredibly fortunate to still get him despite not being able to move up any further.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
23,984
16,719
You put way too much stock in skating when IQ is an order of magnitude more important. Skating is nice, don't get me wrong but there are tons of examples of elite players who were not great skaters and some of them quite bad skaters. There are zero elite players with low hockey IQ.....

What about Josh Ander...oh, I see what you mean
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad