- Jan 18, 2016
- 35,706
- 27,128
I definitely agree positionally that there was less risk/importance there. Hence why Bednar should get input on if he thinks he can get something out of Zegras.Insanely different scenarios.
Burakovsky was a middle-six winger for this club, Zegras would have the expectation of playing 2C behind MacKinnon.
Bednar had others in front of Burakovsky to play/trust especially after Lehkonen arrived. Zegras wouldn't have that luxury and if he's a lemon, it's Parker Kelly at 2C time.
Are we already not at Drury at 2C time? Mitts is playing 9mine a game. If you swap Mitts/Zegras and he flops we’re in the same situation.
I guess I don’t really know what people expect out of a trade for a 2C. You’re either getting someone who’s a marginal upgrade but still not a good fit on Mitts ala Zacha/Nelson. Or you have to take a risk on a younger guy and hope he fits/figures it out like a Cozens/Zegrad. I’m not saying Zegras is a sure fire solution but I’d rather take a shot on someone that has legit high end talent than add another one talent bum that doesn’t change anything.