BaconNater
Registered User
I was pretty optimistic but that one doesn't sound encouraging that's sad
A lot of people have described the injury as such that it can't really get worse, and it doesn't affect normal activities outside of skating. That's why he's still trying. Pretty sure if there was a danger of him f***ing up his knee permanently, he would've given up already.That really doesn’t sound encouraging, honestly, he’s got a young family…I kind of hope he chooses what’s best long-term rather than short-term for himself
I'm not sure that's the case. Obviously, I'm not a doctor or anything, nor do I understand the specific nuances of Landeskog's exact injury. But I'll share a personal experience:A lot of people have described the injury as such that it can't really get worse, and it doesn't affect normal activities outside of skating.
Almost reads as a precursor to a goodbye letter. He sounds like a guy that's gonna end up as a coach or a GM. Perhaps he will join the Avs coaching staff or upper management next year.
Pretty sure that would mean he has to retire, and he's not going to do that.Almost reads as a precursor to a goodbye letter. He sounds like a guy that's gonna end up as a coach or a GM. Perhaps he will join the Avs coaching staff or upper management next year.
Wasn't Pronger getting LTIR while employed by the league?Pretty sure that would mean he has to retire, and he's not going to do that.
Pretty sure Chris Pronger did something similar while on Robidas Island for several years. Garth Snow as well.Pretty sure that would mean he has to retire, and he's not going to do that.
I thought I read somewhere that he can still have another job while on LTIR.Pretty sure that would mean he has to retire, and he's not going to do that.
No player retires when LTIR is an option. They'd be throwing money away.I had to ask my trusty AI agent for the differences between LTIR and retirement. Sounds like Lando will not be retiring -
There are significant salary cap ramifications between retiring from the NHL and being placed on Long-Term Injured Reserve (LTIR):
In summary, retirement removes the contract from the cap (except for over-35 contracts), while LTIR provides temporary cap relief but keeps the player's contract on the books.
- Retirement:
- If a player retires, their contract is removed from the team's salary cap calculations. However, if they signed a multi-year deal at age 35 or older, the cap hit remains due to the NHL's "over-35" rule 4 9.
- Retired players do not receive further salary payments, which is why injured players rarely retire before their contract ends 9.
- LTIR:
- A player on LTIR continues to count against the team's cap but allows the team to exceed the cap by an amount equal to their salary minus existing cap space (the "LTIR Pool") 1 2.
- Teams do not accrue cap space while using LTIR, and any unused LTIR relief cannot be carried forward 1 2.
- Players on LTIR still receive their full salary 9.
He's obviously done this season, but I still think he will try to play at least one more NHL game and see how it goes before deciding to retire.That was not encouraging if you're expecting him back. He's trying his best, but doesn't sound like it's going to happen, and he knows it. As he says in the article, even if he does return, he's not going to be pain free like he hoped. Sounds very Peter Forsberg-esque with his ankle issues.
Luongo is the only one to do it, and he gave up like 3.5M to do it. But he was also immediately hired by the Panthers organization after that. And Luongo later stated, it was not his choice. He would've prefered LTIR, but the Panthers couldn't do it and no team was interested at that time. So Tallon basically said "retire, if you want this job".No player retires when LTIR is an option. They'd be throwing money away.
No. What do you mean by a limit? NHLPA would NEVER give up guaranteed contracts if that's what you are suggesting. They would rather cut the salary cap in half.Is there a limit to how long a player can stay on LTIR?
I just mean years. Let’s say an injury like Landy’s happens when the player has 6 or 7 years remaining on his contract, can he remain on LTIR that long? I know there have been players kept on LTIR for long timeLuongo is the only one to do it, and he gave up like 3.5M to do it. But he was also immediately hired by the Panthers organization after that. And Luongo later stated, it was not his choice. He would've prefered LTIR, but the Panthers couldn't do it and no team was interested at that time. So Tallon basically said "retire, if you want this job".
No. What do you mean by a limit? NHLPA would NEVER give up guaranteed contracts if that's what you are suggesting. They would rather cut the salary cap in half.
Yes, because what's the alternative? You can't force an injured player to play. You can't terminate a contract based on injury.I just mean years. Let’s say an injury like Landy’s happens when the player has 6 or 7 years remaining on his contract, can he remain on LTIR that long? I know there have been players kept on LTIR for long time
Yeah I edited my post because I realized it was a stupid question so never mind LOLYes, because what's the alternative? You can't force an injured player to play. You can't terminate a contract based on injury.