Wood provides nothing and I’d rather spend 6.25m extending Rantanen/Drouin/Malinski than on Colton/Wood.
Brutal but accurate.
You know me, I always am going to love and defend my meat and potatoes players. I love the Messiers, Podeins, Hinotes, Svatos, LOCs, etc... Wood and Colton both play that game to a tee but that's not really what we want/need from our third line when the first unit is taking more than half the game up.
That third line has to be able to produce offense as well as shuting down who they are playing against. It's not good enough to just shut them down with the way the Avs are built. The third line has to be able to contribute offensively at a decent clip as well. Maybe not prolifically but serioualy....it needs to be periodic and much more periodic that it has been.
Wood as you said, isn't worth 2M+. Colton at 4M...I'm still torn on. Can he be an effective top six winger? If so, 4M is a good deal and he should be played as such and traded as such. He's not a 4M C though. I'm glad the Avs tried, it could've been bannana's had he become something approaching a sub-standard 2C jbut the fact is, playing C limits his effectiveness as it neuters his physicality and his ability to thrive on chaos. Centers shouldn't plan on chaos, but I think guys like Colton and Wood thrive on it.