Injury Report: 2024-2025 Injury thread | HF’s Longest Thread Just Got Longer

cinchronicity

Registered User
Jan 16, 2021
879
1,030
Durango
Drouin actually has north of +$35M of career earnings.

How do you equate giving Rantanen a $3M raise to "losing, LOC + Drouin + Mitts + Lehky"???
The math really isn't that hard. Each of those 4 are / will be underpaid when their UFA year arrives (next year for LOC and Drouin.) With Mikko's raise, there is not room to give either Drouin or LOC even a $1M AAV raise next year. Mitts and Lehky will be impacted by Makar's future raise the season following their UFA year. Even with the cap increases, there will not be room for raises for Mitts and Lehky. Remembeer that both Georgie and Ritchie also expire in this interval as well.

Obviously, any of this depends on the situations with Landy and Nuke. If neither return that generates about $4M AAV after replacement players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: niwotsblessing

GoNordiquesGo

Registered User
Oct 1, 2016
779
722
Montreal, Quebec
The math really isn't that hard. Each of those 4 are / will be underpaid when their UFA year arrives (next year for LOC and Drouin.) With Mikko's raise, there is not room to give either Drouin or LOC even a $1M AAV raise next year. Mitts and Lehky will be impacted by Makar's future raise the season following their UFA year. Even with the cap increases, there will not be room for raises for Mitts and Lehky. Remembeer that both Georgie and Ritchie also expire in this interval as well.

Obviously, any of this depends on the situations with Landy and Nuke. If neither return that generates about $4M AAV after replacement players.
So there are 12 variables involved in this equation, not 2. So its not Rantanen' raise will make us lose 4 players. I'm not saying his raise will not hinder the ability to keep everyone, you are absolutely correct that there will be repercussions. Its the drastic direct correlation of "will lose 4 players" that makes me cringe...
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadow1

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
33,301
24,134
We have a fairly easy schedule in October so we should be able to get by without Landy, Lehky and Val
 

RoyIsALegend

Gross Misconduct
Sponsor
Oct 24, 2008
23,834
35,161

1726762069984.gif
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,722
23,680
Immigration issues with Kyllington apparently, should be good to go tomorrow.
 

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,661
32,031
We have a fairly easy schedule in October so we should be able to get by without Landy, Lehky and Val

First month of the season is a crap shoot though.

Nobody is in mid season form. There's chemistry issues. Systems issues. Eventual non playoff teams lead the league in the standings and contenders have losing records.
 

GoNordiquesGo

Registered User
Oct 1, 2016
779
722
Montreal, Quebec
How is he trolling?

I tend to agree with @the_fan , the Avs should be able to get by with those 3 missing. They definitely won’t be racking up points, but should be good enough to survive and stay within fighting distance
I was just kidding. Last time a poster (forgot who it was) posted that the Avs had a soft schedule to start the season, he got challenged and it turned into a 2 pages debate...
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
47,779
31,003
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
I think they'll get by to start but if they don't get significant contributions from one of Landeskog/Nichushkin by December, IMO they'll be in trouble. The key is to do whatever it takes to keep the top guys from getting completely burned out.

It also comes down to goaltending. The best thing Georgie can do to keep his team from having to work so hard for wins is to not make it so they have to f***ing score four goals every night in order to have a chance. Bednar could maybe make for a better PK as well...but I've been banging that drum for years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad