2024-2025 Blues Trade Proposals Thread.

BrokenFace

Registered User
Aug 15, 2010
1,640
1,990
STL
It's not really fair to blame Brady for Ottawa not making the playoffs. Plenty of great players hadn't had playoff success by the time they were 25. As I said before, team success doesn't depend on one player just as one player doesn't fix a team's problems on their own.

I don't wanna get too deep into it since we've already discussed this here but the way I see it both Tkachuk and Kyrou put up similar points but one is a dominant power forward while the other is a mostly one dimensional, nonphysical player. Brady is a leader while Kyrou hasn't shown that kind of character up to this point. I feel he's more content to be a follower, albeit a very skilled one.

I wouldn't give up a ton more, but I'd give up more than most here I suspect.
I agree with you 100% except for the leadership part. When it comes to intangibles like leadership I have to look at team accomplishments, and Ottawa hasn't accomplished anything. That, combined with their contracts, leaves me uninterested. If we're trading Kyrou or Kyrou+, I want someone who has more going for him or addresses a position of need for us. I'd bet a lot on Brady looking great on a more functional team/organization then Ottawa, but I think he'd only be a marginal upgrade over Kyrou and would need a new 7 or 8 year contract that comes with a sizable rise in AAV in few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Majorityof1

SirPaste

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 30, 2010
14,585
826
STL
Brady is the same flavor as Kyrou with different toppings. Skilled offensive forward who leaves a lot to be desired defensively. Brady just takes a lot more dumb penalties.

If his name wasn't Tkachuk we wouldn't be talking about him Nearly as much.
Agreed with this. I like Tkachuk but I am not tripping over myself to acquire him, seems like everyone loves him here because of his name and where he was born. The thing is we need another skilled top 6 on top of Kyrou, so trading Kyrou for another one doesn't really make much sense to me. We do need to bring in another impactful forward though, preferably at center but at this point in the retool I am not sure right now is the correct time to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Majorityof1

STL fan in MN

Registered User
Aug 16, 2007
7,686
5,213
If we were going to trade Kyrou for a Tkachuk, it should’ve been Matthew a couple years ago when Calgary was shopping him. We’ll never know for sure but I recall JR saying the Blues offer didn’t include Kyrou. My impression has always been that Army lowballed Calgary expecting to win the bidding anyway and he lost that game of chicken.

But that ship has sailed. Brady is good but not nearly as good as his brother IMO. 100% agree we wouldn’t be talking about him much at all if he didn’t have the Tkachuk/STL connection.

Might as well talk about acquiring the kid Utah just named their captain. Just as likely to happen IMO.
 
Last edited:

PocketNines

Cutter's Way
Apr 29, 2004
13,730
5,793
Badlands
The part that never made sense is it seemingly comes from a desire to recapture the memories of Keith who was one of the most selfish players and a pure choker. Something happened to Blues fans who were born in the late 80s early 90s, they were too young when Tkachuk was on the team to have differentiation rooting it was just pure rooting.

I want to be arguing about whether we should trade Kyrou for Perron's kids, and Perron's healthy daughter Elizabeth right there amid it all
 

Majorityof1

Registered User
Mar 6, 2014
8,844
7,673
Central Florida
Glad to see a lot of posters nailing it with the Tkachuk-Kyrou trade talk. Tkachuk is not enough better to justify the trade cost and contract length. Kyrou has improved defensively, Tkachuk has not. Neutral fans think we need to add 1st rd pick ++ to Kyrou to even it out. That is far more than the difference on ice

The trade, if it happened, would be in the off-season. Tkachuk would have 3 years left before wanting a $10m+ deal taking him into his mid 30s. Kyrou would have twice as long at his current cap

One final note, a lot of people bring up BTs PIMs to diminish his value. I did too and another poster pointed out his penalties drawn. He draws more than he takes. So while the trade-off of losing a $8M player for whoever he is pulling into the box with him is probably a loss, he isn't leaving his team short handed as often as you'd think. Just pointing that out even though it goes against my take for a more honest discussion.
 
Last edited:

BleedBlue14

UrGeNcY
Feb 9, 2017
6,354
4,902
St. Louis
I would be much more interested in trading from our futures pool (minus Dvorsky or Lindstein) for Brady than trying to swap Kyrou for him while adding.

I’d imagine I’d someone were wanting to compare it to the Matthew trade - which they shouldn’t, Matthew was a pretty complete player already - the ask would be Kyrou, Broberg and a 1st. That shouldn’t even be contemplated.

If it were something along the lines of Bolduc a 1st and another pick and possibly prospect like a Fischer or Ralph, sure that would make more sense in my eyes at least even if I don’t know if it’s in our best interest. I think the long-term signing of Buch along with the emergence of Neighbors, should put to bed any ideas we have about desperately needing a guy like Tkachuk.
 

Reality Czech

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
5,701
9,268
I agree with you 100% except for the leadership part. When it comes to intangibles like leadership I have to look at team accomplishments, and Ottawa hasn't accomplished anything. That, combined with their contracts, leaves me uninterested. If we're trading Kyrou or Kyrou+, I want someone who has more going for him or addresses a position of need for us. I'd bet a lot on Brady looking great on a more functional team/organization then Ottawa, but I think he'd only be a marginal upgrade over Kyrou and would need a new 7 or 8 year contract that comes with a sizable rise in AAV in few years.

Leadership alone doesn't get a team into the playoffs. Even McDavid didn't get to the playoffs until he was If the Blues were in a division with Tampa, Florida, Boston and Toronto I doubt we'd fare any better than Ottawa. I guess I'm thinking more of his competitiveness and willingness to stick up for teammates.

If we were going to trade Kyrou for a Tkachuk, it should’ve been Matthew a couple years ago when Calgary was shopping him. We’ll never know for sure but I recall JR saying the Blues offer didn’t include Kyrou. My impression has always been that Army lowballed Calgary expecting to win the bidding anyway and he lost that game of chicken.

But that ship has sailed. Brady is good but not nearly as good as his brother IMO. 100% agree we wouldn’t be talking about him much at all if he didn’t have the Tkachuk/STL connection.

Might as well talk about acquiring the kid Utah just named their captain. Just as likely to happen IMO.

I think it's more likely Brady asks out of Ottawa than Utah making Keller available any time soon, but still not terribly likely. Regarding Matthew, the bigger challenge was moving Krug and/or Tarasenko to clear enough salary. Not sure what the actual offer would have been but the covid cap would have made it extremely complicated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STL fan in MN

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad