Reality Czech
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 6,431
- 10,349
Maybe it's the 70% defensive zone starts that are the issue?
And I'm guessing Bolduc's usage is the opposite. I'm seeing 55% O zone starts for him.
Maybe it's the 70% defensive zone starts that are the issue?
It comes down to your last sentence here. Toropchenko might have worse numbers, but he makes the 4th line better than Joseph does. I imagine the Walker-Faksa-Toropchenko line is an absolute pain to play against, which is what you want out of your 4th line. You don't necessarily need them to score, just be responsible defensively and wear down the opposition. Toropchenko does this better than Joseph due to his size/range and his motor.
I'd also argue that Toropchenko is the better/more valuable player at an individual level anyways, all things considered. They're close, though.
Your Toropchenko bias has been pretty obvious. I think its clouding your impressions here.I don't know if Torop does make the 4th line better. Joseph has speed as well and is a solid on the fore and backcheck. He hits too. He has 9 hits per 60 vs Torop's 12. Now that is 33% more for Toro, but a lot of his hits seem meaningless to me. He doesn't separate the puck. He has a team worst among forwards .39 takeaways per 60 compared to Jospeh's team leading 1.9. We have not really tried Joseph much in that 4th line winger role as the 4th line has been fairly set. Torop does block shots at a higher rate.
Note - I do not like Torop, so I admit the possibility of bias.
Being a pain to play against is one thing, being an actually good 4th line is another. I never said they were a good 4th line. I do think Toropchenko makes the line better than Joseph does, though. It's still not a great 4th line no matter who's in.The 5v5 numbers disagree. All three of those guys are in the low to mid-40s in GF%, xGF%, xSC%, and xHDSC%. They may be a pain to play against based on the eye test, but we are consistently being outscored and outchanced this season when that group is on the ice. Not sure what that solution is, but finding a solution that pushes Torpo and Walker into the 13th/14th forward role would be a positive outcome.
Conversely, looking at these same metrics for Bolduc, even in a role less suited to his strengths, suggests he should be getting more ice time and a more prominent role in the offense. I think he’s ready for it.
When you guys see the thumbnail picture of this dude who do you think he looks like?
You bought weed from Jordan Binnington?The guy everyone bought weed from back in high school?
This is purely about Fowler and MY Kyrou comment, nothing else. I consider Kyrou thinking he can do some dirty dangles at full speed in the final minute of a game with an EN to be the pinnacle of stupid ass bullshit compared to Fowler trying to pass to an incompetent team mate to be much less of a problem.
Fowler is God and should never be questioned about anything. EVER!!!Fowler trying to pass to an incompetent teammate? This is part of the issue. Fowler made a dumb mistake. Which again to my point isn't that serious because the good far outweighs the bad, but people want to make excuses for the guys they like and vilify the guys they don't like. Fowler tried to make a pass to Neighbours, who was flanked in the middle of the ice by defenders, when he had time and space to make another decision. The puck was in our net about 4 seconds later. It's the same thing. It's a boneheaded play based on over-confidence with the same result. He doesn't get bonus points just because you like him more.
Haha, I wasn't on board with the acquisition, but he's made me eat a lot of crow. Not infallible, but very good.Fowler is God and should never be questioned about anything. EVER!!!
Bingo. Usage matters when analyzing team based shooting metrics.Maybe it's the 70% defensive zone starts that are the issue?
You bought weed from Jordan Binnington?
Contract aside I haven't really seen anything from him that would lead me to believe he deserves to be in the lineup. He has been pretty meh when playing. I was led to believe he would be a good two way forward with good PK skills, I haven't really seen that tbh. He has definitely had some solid games, especially early on in the season but mostly just invisible out there.Maybe surprised there isn’t more discussion (not necessarily here just in general) about M Joseph scratches. Seems to come and go.
Kinda expensive and when 3 mil aav players sit it’s usually discussed a bit.
He’s got a year of term after this.
Sure hope they’re working on something with him and plan to use him in the future. That’s a lot of cap for 1.5 years and pretty challenging if he cant crack the bottom 6. I gotta think M Joseph could be a super impactful playoff skater.
Contract aside I haven't really seen anything from him that would lead me to believe he deserves to be in the lineup. He has been pretty meh when playing. I was led to believe he would be a good two way forward with good PK skills, I haven't really seen that tbh. He has definitely had some solid games, especially early on in the season but mostly just invisible out there.
I think it feels like the first part of the season and now are a totally different dude. Maybe the injury he had earlier remains…
It’s just so odd…if you told me hey, we got a 27 y/o bottom 6 dude that is above 6 foot tall and costs 3 mil I’d be thinking that our bottom 6 was going to dominate. 3 milly is pricey af for a bottom 6 wing. And the only thing getting dominated is the pressbox coffee machine. He gets to sit and watch how Nathan walker carved out a career…and despite his youth and size he can’t displace Nathan from the lineup. I’m a huge fan of walker but, no offense meant to him, if you can’t displace him when you’re taller, faster, younger…that’s rough. I’d be working my butt off…
Exactly, there is a reason Ottawa spend a third round pick just to dump his contract.Why are you so hung up on his salary? He's a 27 yo. 6ft dude that costs $3M that we were given a pick to take for free. If you had REALLY high expectations of a guy when the other team is paying us a 3rd to take, that's on you. He obviously was not worth his salary. They gave up a pIck for us to take him. That changes the whole story.