In terms of management and the roster they built, this is theoretically the optimal roster with their OPS+ over the 2021-22 seasons :
1. Springer 135
2. Bichette 125
3. Guerrero 150
4. Belt 130
5. Chapman 108
6. Jansen 125/Kirk 120
7. Varsho 106
8, Merrifield 92
9. Kiermaier 98
Like, that should be a freaking murderers row, in theory. No weak spots, multiple elite bats, should have no problems being one of the best offenses in MLB. Belt was really the only big question mark after putting up poor numbers while playing injured in 2022, and there was no real reason to expect big declines from anyone else (except maybe Merrifield but you could expect Espinal/Biggio to put up similar numbers if age hit there).
And obviously that hasn't happened.
But ... is that management's fault? Or is it just bad luck and unexpected outcomes? Like, would any other management group have expected Guerrero and Kirk to crater like this or the weird RISP results and somehow created an alternative plan to avoid it?
And as a Canucks fan, I've seen dumb reactionary outcomes replace the best GM in franchise history with Jim Benning when one season went badly, and that is an avenue you don't want to go down.
And in terms of the manager, I don't see much of a problem with his individual decision making. And maybe a manager can create a bad environment where people underachieve, but an environment where pitchers overachieve and players overachieve defensively but only underachieve at the plate? That doesn't seem right.
Like, I don't know. This has been a weird, weird freaking season.