- Jun 14, 2010
- 11,010
- 15,424
Can't post the clip but I envision this happening. Also I love Slapshot
Can't post the clip but I envision this happening. Also I love Slapshot
Sad.
Ask Phil Esposito or anyone else on those 68-73 teams how they feel. Great regular seasons, yipeeee. Leaving at Least 1 Cup on the table, probably two and if you stretch it out to 74 the Flyers Cup was also very winnable.Last 13 seasons
Most points
Most wins 635
Highest win %
Most Prez trophies
Second most Finals
Second most playoff series wins 15
But only one Cup they suck and are losers - yawn
Give me LA
2 Cups (snicker)
Yes and every player, coach and management member in that building would have traded all those regular season wins for a 2nd cup as well.
I would be curious if LA Kings fans would trade one of their Cups for a couple Presidents trophies.
Ask Phil Esposito or anyone else on those 68-73 teams how they feel. Great regular seasons, yipeeee. Leaving at Least 1 Cup on the table, probably two and if you stretch it out to 74 the Flyers Cup was also very winnable.
I take Cups, not President Trophies, President Trophies are the NHL equivalent of a participation award.
…..and I thought the Game 7 Post Game Thread went on forever.
Fun game.Here's a hypothetical - would you trade Charlie McAvoy for Elias Pettersson in a straight hockey trade, presuming Pettersson would be eager to sign long term?
The Bruins defense loses big time while the 1C position is set for a decade. Pettersson has been quoted as not being keen on staying with Vancouver if they aren't winning, which hasn't been their thing for a while now. They could really use a top RD like Charlie, and it's his final season without trade protection.
What say you, HFBruins?
I asked several times for all these posters that feel Gryz is a significant part of the Bruins always using advanced stats of some level to justify there argument . What is Gryz's trade value???. I personally would be very pleased if the Bruins could get a 2nd round pick as a return .I think he would have been moved by now if they could3 of those 4 have some type of NMC/NTC and Grizz really isn't worth much or he would be gone already.
Here's a hypothetical - would you trade Charlie McAvoy for Elias Pettersson in a straight hockey trade, presuming Pettersson would be eager to sign long term?
The Bruins defense loses big time while the 1C position is set for a decade. Pettersson has been quoted as not being keen on staying with Vancouver if they aren't winning, which hasn't been their thing for a while now. They could really use a top RD like Charlie, and it's his final season without trade protection.
What say you, HFBruins?
I think Grizz does have some value, the others well many times when a player is asked to waive his ntc/nmc they often do, unless it is a place they would detest going to, Calgary and especially Vancouver are nice cities.3 of those 4 have some type of NMC/NTC and Grizz really isn't worth much or he would be gone already.
Like I said though. it would have to more hockey deals, some futures could be involved yes, but you would have to move out salary as well.How can they land both realistically? I’m all for it but I don’t see the numbers there.
I would if Vancouver throws in a 1st, we need picks and top young Center, but McAvoy is a top pairing D, him and Hughes would be huge for the next decade for the Canucks. We would have to bring in someone like Mayfield who could play 2nd pair and move up Carlo, while grooming Lohrei. McAvoy is talented and top pair guy, but sometimes leaves you wanting more.Here's a hypothetical - would you trade Charlie McAvoy for Elias Pettersson in a straight hockey trade, presuming Pettersson would be eager to sign long term?
The Bruins defense loses big time while the 1C position is set for a decade. Pettersson has been quoted as not being keen on staying with Vancouver if they aren't winning, which hasn't been their thing for a while now. They could really use a top RD like Charlie, and it's his final season without trade protection.
What say you, HFBruins?
I would be curious if LA Kings fans would trade one of their Cups for a couple Presidents trophies.
If I must say I get around and asked probably 50 people this actually maybe more since a couple of text groups are 14 and 17 - many of my buds who played college and professionally as well as a number of my Bruins buddies, golf, gym, judo, yoga, neighbors who are hockey fans - and the 4 text groups I’m on including the best and brightest one time HF members who retiredI’d love to see the reaction on kopitar and Doughty if someone asked if they’d rather have two cups or the bruins regular season success.
I cannot believe this is even a debate.
Or I wonder if we asked pastrnak would he trade the most regular season wins during his tenure for a cup.
For me we should have had it all, meaning 2 cups not one plus all the other successAsk Phil Esposito or anyone else on those 68-73 teams how they feel. Great regular seasons, yipeeee. Leaving at Least 1 Cup on the table, probably two and if you stretch it out to 74 the Flyers Cup was also very winnable.
I take Cups, not President Trophies, President Trophies are the NHL equivalent of a participation award.
If I must say I get around and asked probably 50 people this - many of my buds who played college and professionally as well as a number of my Bruins buddies, golf, gym, judo, yoga, neighbors who are hockey fans - and the 4 text groups I’m on including the best and brightest one time HF members who retired
If it’s 50 - it’s 50 to nothing Bruins
Hard to argue the facts...So many teams/players would be envious. Success breads success.Last 13 seasons
Most points
Most wins 635
Highest win %
Most Prez trophies
Second most Finals
Second most playoff series wins 15
But only one Cup they suck and are losers - yawn
Give me LA
2 Cups (snicker)
I get the question. And in the 80s this kind of shit happened all the time. But I’d say no. Can’t do a thing like that anymore. This is well above Johansen for Jones and I can’t think of any comparable since then.Here's a hypothetical - would you trade Charlie McAvoy for Elias Pettersson in a straight hockey trade, presuming Pettersson would be eager to sign long term?
The Bruins defense loses big time while the 1C position is set for a decade. Pettersson has been quoted as not being keen on staying with Vancouver if they aren't winning, which hasn't been their thing for a while now. They could really use a top RD like Charlie, and it's his final season without trade protection.
What say you, HFBruins?
Stop! This is painfulWas that when Marchand had a wide open net and shot it into Binnington's armpit?
"Yes"Here's a hypothetical - would you trade Charlie McAvoy for Elias Pettersson in a straight hockey trade, presuming Pettersson would be eager to sign long term?
The Bruins defense loses big time while the 1C position is set for a decade. Pettersson has been quoted as not being keen on staying with Vancouver if they aren't winning, which hasn't been their thing for a while now. They could really use a top RD like Charlie, and it's his final season without trade protection.
What say you, HFBruins?
I would hate it but probably yes. Love McAvoy to bits, but I think EP/Lindholm as your 1C/1D combo gets you hell of a lot closer to a cup then Zacha/McAvoy.Here's a hypothetical - would you trade Charlie McAvoy for Elias Pettersson in a straight hockey trade, presuming Pettersson would be eager to sign long term?
The Bruins defense loses big time while the 1C position is set for a decade. Pettersson has been quoted as not being keen on staying with Vancouver if they aren't winning, which hasn't been their thing for a while now. They could really use a top RD like Charlie, and it's his final season without trade protection.
What say you, HFBruins?
Concidently, 2011 wouldn't have happened if the best team in the East played the best in the West. (they were top of their division but 4th in Eastern conference standings)I totally enjoyed watching the Bruins winning all those games last season .
Team with the most wins East and West play for the cup . That's what I'd like to see.
The cup now is more luck than skill
Some of both.Concidently, 2011 wouldn't have happened if the best team in the East played the best in the West.
Playoffs are fine.
Good teams win enough to get to the playoffs. Great teams figure out how to win in the playoffs.
Was the 2011 team a great or lucky team?