Kudo Shinichi
Registered User
- Apr 20, 2012
- 21,500
- 28,930
Fantili on pace for 71 pts in 40 games.
Same point total as Eichel had
Same point total as Eichel had
If it happens Gorton and Hughes can GTFO. Ill kick them out myselfLots of smoke that we wouldn't draft Michkov with our first 1st and would only consider it with the second 1st if he's available. Habs are eager to rush another player who may or may not put it together in 3 years whereas Michkov will come in 3 years and have a Kaprizov-like impact.
Youre falling in hyperbole again like when you said Jiricek was a better skater and stronger than prime Subban. Refrain from that, it makes your opinion worthless.Only skill Cooley has the edge over Moore IMO is playmaking. Moore's playmaking is not high end, thats the only thing that could make him a winger more than a center, but I would say thats still good enough. Smith is also a better playmaker than Moore.
Moore skills chart:
Skating 9 Motor 9 Puckhandling 7 Playmaking 6 shooting 7 IQ 7 Strength 7.
I thought we could now discuss prospects respectfully with each others, I removed you from my ignore list to let you another chance after you tried to ridicule me for my position on our 1st OV, who I ended up to be right on BTW despite poeple trying to shut me up at some point. I was also a huge Jiricek fan and you are using an hyperbole I made to discredit me again. Cheap shot my friend.Youre falling in hyperbole again like when you said Jiricek was a better skater and stronger than prime Subban. Refrain from that, it makes your opinion worthless.
Cooley is in another stratosphere playmaking wise, puckhandling wise and hes an equal skater. His motor is also great and a good defensive player. Moore is nice, but he does not have the talent Cooley has.
As for Smith, hes close to a 10 everywhere but skating and shooting, wheres hes a 6ish and 8ish.
Only skill Cooley has the edge over Moore IMO is playmaking. Moore's playmaking is not high end, thats the only thing that could make him a winger more than a center, but I would say thats still good enough. Smith is also a better playmaker than Moore.
Moore skills chart:
Skating 9 Motor 9 Puckhandling 7 Playmaking 6 shooting 7 IQ 7 Strength 7.
I thought we could now discuss prospects respectfully with each others, I removed you from my ignore list to let you another chance after you tried to ridicule me for my position on our 1st OV, who I ended up to be right on BTW despite poeple trying to shut me up at some point. I was also a huge Jiricek fan and you are using an hyperbole I made to discredit me again. Cheap shot my friend.
As for Moore vs Cooley, lets take a look at their USNDTP stats first, Cooley produced at a 1,47 PPG pace meanwhile Moore is on track to have similar numbers producing at a 1,31 pace. But thats only telling one part of the story since Cooley had much better linemates and was always used on the top PP unit, meanwhile Moore's offensive production came from playing with guys with lesser talent level like Nelson, a projected 2nd round pick and getting 2nd PP unit time.
Cooley played mostly with Gauthier, a 5th overall pick and Suggerud, another 1st round pick. 2 big talended wingers to complement him, he was in ideal conditions to rack up the points.
As for the playmaking, I gave Cooley the edge, stickhandling is close, Moore has great hands too. Cooley is a very good skater, Moore is elite. Cooley is an average shooter, Moore has a deadly wrister with very quick release. Thats close.
Brindley vs Moore?
I'll put my Ovaltine down and give you a hand.If it happens Gorton and Hughes can GTFO. Ill kick them out myself
I thought we could now discuss prospects respectfully with each others, I removed you from my ignore list to let you another chance after you tried to ridicule me for my position on our 1st OV, who I ended up to be right on BTW despite poeple trying to shut me up at some point. I was also a huge Jiricek fan and you are using an hyperbole I made to discredit me again. Cheap shot my friend.
As for Moore vs Cooley, lets take a look at their USNDTP stats first, Cooley produced at a 1,47 PPG pace meanwhile Moore is on track to have similar numbers producing at a 1,31 pace. But thats only telling one part of the story since Cooley had much better linemates and was always used on the top PP unit, meanwhile Moore's offensive production came from playing with guys with lesser talent level like Nelson, a projected 2nd round pick and getting 2nd PP unit time.
Cooley played mostly with Gauthier, a 5th overall pick and Suggerud, another 1st round pick. 2 big talended wingers to complement him, he was in ideal conditions to rack up the points.
As for the playmaking, I gave Cooley the edge, stickhandling is close, Moore has great hands too. Cooley is a very good skater, Moore is elite. Cooley is an average shooter, Moore has a deadly wrister with very quick release. Thats close.
What type of player is Sale ? Keep finding him around 12-15 but im yet to hear someone very excited about him
Moore, not even close.
Brindley gets overrated.
What makes it not even close to you?
Moore is a better skater, more competitive, has a better frame, has a better shot and is more reliable all over the ice.
Brindley is smart but I can't tell you one tool he has that is above average.
Alright I'll have a look.
I've probably triggered Goldenhands. He loves Moore but also loves Brindley. He won't know what to think.
I would be surprised if the Habs pick Sale.What type of player is Sale ? Keep finding him around 12-15 but im yet to hear someone very excited about him
Youre falling in hyperbole again like when you said Jiricek was a better skater and stronger than prime Subban. Refrain from that, it makes your opinion worthless.
Cooley is in another stratosphere playmaking wise, puckhandling wise and hes an equal skater. His motor is also great and a good defensive player. Moore is nice, but he does not have the talent Cooley has.
As for Smith, hes close to a 10 everywhere but skating and shooting, wheres hes a 6ish and 8ish.
Where isnt he close to a ten ?Weren't you talking about "falling in hyperbole"
How does Smith compare to Suzuki to those who have seen Smith a lot? Sounds awfully similar. Both right-handed, similar size, just "ok" skating and motor, great vision, IQ and playmaking.
Any big differences?
Where isnt he close to a ten ?