MarkovsKnee
Global Moderator
I'd be pretty giddy to get Smith at 6.
Just need Vancouver to get a new coach bump, and no one behind us to win the lottery, and it's possible!
A bit better odds for a top 2 pick too.
I'd be pretty giddy to get Smith at 6.
Thats ridiculous, Allen still has an insane skillset.His stock keeps dropping. He may be one of those kids who peaked too early. He's also not producing. I don't like his trajectory.
There's not much to like about him this year.
Barron could skate though.
Just need Vancouver to get a new coach bump, and no one behind us to win the lottery, and it's possible!
A bit better odds for a top 2 pick too.
haven't seen a lot of Stramel but that was his best game that i've seen
I think he could be a fantastic player to play on your bottom 6, maybe middle 6. Paul Gustav 2.0 with a bit better goalscoring?I'm pretty sure scouts think he's the next Charlie Coyle (went #28). That's who he reminds me of. I think that's his upside. A big, defensively strong 35-45 pt center.
I think he could be a fantastic player to play on your bottom 6, maybe middle 6. Paul Gustav 2.0 with a bit better goalscoring?
Thats a very good comparable IMO, not really a fan, but the comparison in term of size and playing style is pretty accurate IMO. Hopefully another team picks him before our 2nd.I'm pretty sure scouts think he's the next Charlie Coyle (went #28). That's who he reminds me of. I think that's his upside. A big, defensively strong 35-45 pt center.
That top line of Perreault Smith Leonard is stacked, you have there 3 1st round talents playing on the same line, on a strong team, so obviously, they will rack up the points like crazy. While all 3 are highly talented, they all have strengths and weaknesses, with Perreault I would say the lack of physical involvement and a tendency to turn it over sometimes (IQ) makes him more difficult to project at the next levels, the reason why you will see him lower on most lists, but in term of skills alone, he is among the most talented of the draft.I don't watch American college hockey. When I look at the USDP prospect stats, I notice that G Perrault is the youngest of the group (W Smith, R Leonard, O Moore) but he is the one producing the most points. G Perrault 36 games= 69 points! W Smith 33 games=62 points , R Leonard 31 games=49 points, O Moore 34 games=46 points I know the points don't say everything but he is ranked lower than the other 3 according to McKenzie. For those who have seen him play, what kind of player is he and what is his potential? thank you
I was the first one in on Reinbacher stop that right now, Im the true hip prospect dude
Be good. Get first look at prospects we hear so much about on hereTop prospect game this Wednesday.
Look at me. LOOK at me. I am the Reinbacher stan now.
Would you be satisfied if we drafted that whole line first round? Good chance we acquire another firstThat top line of Perreault Smith Leonard is stacked, you have there 3 1st round talents playing on the same line, on a strong team, so obviously, they will rack up the points like crazy. While all 3 are highly talented, they all have strengths and weaknesses, with Perreault I would say the lack of physical involvement and a tendency to turn it over sometimes (IQ) makes him more difficult to project at the next levels, the reason why you will see him lower on most lists, but in term of skills alone, he is among the most talented of the draft.
I'd be pretty giddy to get Smith at 6.
Insane skillset? That's hilarious!Thats ridiculous, Allen still has an insane skillset.
Now I want Smith and ASP/Reinbacher with the Panthers pick.
Thanks for making me have unrealistic dreams, Bob.
Hes a defensively responsible guy with a good toolbox. Its not a matter of peaking early at all to me, its a matter of projections. People thought hed take a big step into a PPG defender but he didn't, thats fine, not all good prospects have to be top 5 worthy players.Insane skillset? That's hilarious!
If that was the case, he'd put up points in the OHL and wouldn't be free falling on all draft lists. He's a kid who built a big name for himself after growing earlier than his peers. There is nothing top drawer about his "insane skillset".
We should be thinking 5 years down the road. Not what he did when he was physically stronger than his peers. He may have plateaued. I just don't see anything about him that excites me other than he competes.I wouldn't completely close the book yet on Cameron Allen, he's still a strong skating, potential two-way workhorse prospect if you can develop him correctly. There's certainly a point in the later first round where he makes a lot of sense, I wouldn't let him slip past me without really thinking about it if I'm picking in the 20's. He's having a complete garbage draft year but it doesn't negate everything else he's done before .
17 years old with great skating being trusted by his coach more than the older guys in the final minutes (last game or the one before IIRC). This is impressive in a 19 years old's tourney.It's weird.. ASP's WJC made me want him less where it seemed to accelerate his stock with everyone else.
17 years old with great skating being trusted by his coach more than the older guys in the final minutes (last game or the one before IIRC). This is impressive in a 19 years old's tourney.
Also his J20 production is pretty f***ing good (13 goals, 27 pts in 21 games) and his SHL numbers (5 in 17) are very good too for a D-1. And its not like he can't defend like Dragicevic.
A dynamic but somewhat undersized defenseman like him would be a good fit with Guhle IMO. Assuming Reinbacher is gone, he seems like a logical pick with the Panthers pick assuming its around 12-15. I'd rather him than a safer pick like Ritchie for sure. Might be gone sooner because of teams reaching for defensemen though.
We should be thinking 5 years down the road. Not what he did when he was physically stronger than his peers. He may have plateaued. I just don't see anything about him that excites me other than he competes.