I think Dubas overall did a pretty good job drafting, and selected some kids that will help us down the road. That being said, I do think a prospect pool needs some balance to it. You want the best players you can at the draft, but if it's close, and you have a need somewhere, then go with the need. Pointing out... I do mean close. Dubas did early on pick players that were too similar... though the last couple of years, less so. Maybe he was learning, or maybe it's just the way things worked out with his methodology... after all, these are relatively small sample sizes.
Were they really all that similar though?
Lisowsky, Miettinen, Ovchinnikov, Kizimov, and Robertson are somewhat similar.
Miller, Voit, Grebyonkin, and Abruzzese are somewhat similar. SDA is kind of a unique guy as he is the only one who is really a true perimeter playmaker, but he would be closest to those 4.
Amirov, Moldenhauer, Minten, Hirvonen, Holmberg, Schingoethe, Abramov, and Tverberg would likely fill similar roles, albeit some as centers and others as wingers. Knies is sort of a combination of this category and the first category.
Kokkonen, Kral, Villeneuve, Koster, and Niemela can all different roles in different ways. Durzi, Rindell, Fusco, and Hollowell were more offensive but Durzi was gone before most of those guys were brought in and the others were hardly high end prospects at any point.
If we had even half of these guys turn into legit NHLers, we are doing better than most teams... And we'd have a lot of valuable trade chips to use for other trades. We probably could use a few more centers and defensemen in general, but wingers, we have various types. Maybe not a ton of physical power-forward types, but there have also been very few good ones to draft over the past few years anyways.