Good point. I don't remember who else was available for each pick and they started at pick 20, but they definitely didn't reach and go off the board.
Seems like for many years before that they'd "draft for need" instead of BPA, or they'd outsmart themselves and pick someone way out of turn.
Totally agree. BPA is way more important when you're drafting late, then crucial as you get past the first round. Last year felt like a sea change for us in that regard, and I think they did well this year, too.
The other thing to consider is that the best people qualified to make a list at all are NHL scouts and execs. People from other leagues are biased, pundits don't know shit because they rightfully spend all of their time covering the only league most people care about, and all the prognostication sites with their "expert rankings" are mostly horseshit but at least less biased.
This is why I don't get too involved in pre-draft discussions, because most people on the street and in forums are operating off rankings I don't believe in without seeing really any players actually play. I see tons of these guys play, have lots of feelings about how good I think they are, but find it impossible to weigh a standout in this league versus that one.
Take "played against children" and "playing against adults," for example. Forum posters love this comp, and it's dodgy. The guys that get high rankings versus "children" are playing against the best "children" in the world, all champing at the bit to make it to the next level and get where they are via the best talent evaluators on the planet.
The adult leagues that have kids running around have ridiculous mixtures of talent in their adult ranks, from NHL hopefuls to that guy you'd swear was in your beer league last year. This means WAY less than people think. I only really think it matters when a kid plays v. adults when you see him take a thumping and see how he responds. That he's in that situation at all says a lot about his trajectory elsewise.
So on draft day you have to trust your team's staff, for better or worse. There are 31 other staffs, but they don't share info, so your scout team is a lot like your actual NHL team that way. About a dozen respectable news outlets put out "expert" rankings, and none of them have a scintilla of the first-person insight NHL scout teams do. I'm sure they have access to scouts off the record, but those people are at least equally interested in delivering misinformation to reporters as they are good information. All other info comes from hugely biased sources.
So we're all just along for the ride. I GREATLY appreciate people in forums like this that appear to also do the deep dive on young players, whether it's for their exhaustive knowledge and honest interpretive insight (
@Langway), gathering and distilling stats and opinions so I don't have to (
@twabby), or just the knowledge with unfiltered opinions, whether I agree (
@Kalopsia) or not (
@Hivemind a lot of the time, but I appreciate his perspective regardless).
Having free access to a resource like this forum makes me feel better about just watching way more hockey than is probably healthy. Let them do the work.
Thanks for making draft days better, HFCaps...