It’s an optimal strategy for 895, like it or hate it.Agree, we do have no idea either way. We have no idea if they even pursued a deal.
Either way, I do feel mgmt is trying to tow the line between building for the future and competing now which usually doesn’t end well.
With the plan they are pursuing right now, you end up being just bad enough to miss the playoffs and just good enough to not get great draft positioning. It’s a bad strategy. They need to make up their mind on what they are trying to do.
Calling Suzuki an elite two-way center is being very generous at this point in his career. His underlying metrics are by and large pretty bad and his scoring stats this year we’re inflated by shooting 16%. He’s supposed to be a beast defensively but he’s not. He has all the talent to be a top 15 center for sure but he’s not there yet and he hasn’t shown improvement in important areas of his game. He’s more Kuznetsov than Barkov at the moment. Obviously he’s still young so he can and probably will develop but I bet if you have the Habs some truth serum they’d tell you they thought he’d be further along by now. Caufield I agree is a great sniper but he’s terrible defensively.I don't know, they could have made different choices of course but looking at max potential i see an elite two-way center (Suzuki) an elite sniper (Caufield) a good to great huge power forward with skill (Slaf) 2 good playmaking #2 C (Newhook and Dach) a bruising d-man (Xhekaj) a good to great two-way D with offensive skill (Reinbacher) a good two-way D with some snarl (Guhle).
Sure, Cooley and Wright are great and i guess Nemec aswell but seems like they're building a pretty strong two-way team with an edge and they already have a Cooley and a Wright in Caufield and Suzuki.
But obviously, predicting these things isn't even done to a high degree by people doing it for a living so what do i know![]()