GDT: 2023 Caps NHL Draft Thread

ArmadilloThumb

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
687
508
Bukala has Honzek at 15 (as a C, 6'4", 186), but may be the kind of player that Mahoney likes (size, Hockey IQ, scoring/playmaking). Skating can be taught (was a concern about Wilson early on too), and is out of the WHL. If skating improves, maybe top line potential is possible.

Screenshot_20230620_121716_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Last edited:

ArmadilloThumb

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
687
508
Correction on Honzek... Bukala's June 16th update moves him up to 12, and projects as a Top 3. Also now lists him as 6'4", 195.

Screenshot_20230628_010156_Samsung Internet.jpg
 

ArmadilloThumb

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
687
508
Bukala's updated list of 80...

Code:
https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/scouts-analysis-final-ranking-of-the-top-80-prospects-for-the-2023-nhl-draft/
 
Last edited:

ArmadilloThumb

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
687
508
Bukala's Mock has us get Michkov...

(I'm adding the links this way because HF Boards is translating it to a media-only link)

Code:
https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/jason-bukalas-2023-nhl-mock-draft-what-happens-after-bedard-goes-first/
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandyHolt

Kalopsia

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 25, 2018
1,041
1,931



Weekes on ESPN has us taking him….kid is a beast.

Great video. They've also done ones on Michkov, Benson, and Dvorsky that are worth checking out. Anyone else catch Suzdalev's appearance on the advantages created list? 6th overall and top from his draft class. No idea how well-validated that stat is, but it feeds my confirmation biases so I like it!

Screen Shot 2023-06-28 at 1.01.02 AM.png
 

RedRocking

Registered User
Jan 8, 2022
7,132
8,533
NoCal
Holy cow, that is championship material player.
Yea if they can’t go up and get Michkov (I’m onboard w/ using significant assets to do so) - it’s Leonard, then Benson.

Otherwise, I still like Moore - which may not be the best value at 8OA according the latest mocks. But he has athletic ability you can’t teach, with such a high motor and compete level. I’d rather take a guy with that raw talent, and top-line upside over the safer Dvorsky.
 

895

Registered User
Jun 15, 2007
8,565
7,549
I'm not reading about any other prospect because I feel so strongly we will get Michkov.
 

pman25

Registered User
Aug 29, 2009
4,822
3,684
Richmond
I do love Leonard’s game, I think he doesn’t get past Arizona. The only pick I wouldn’t be thrilled with is probably Reinbacher. I’m not as low on the upside potential for Dvorsky, especially being a younger player in the class. I also don’t think Michkov is in Ovi/Malkin/Kaprisov territory which is why I’m fine not trading up for him, considering the other risks attached to him. I’m not so sure he’s a clear tier above Benson.

But regardless I’m excited for this post to be bumped in 10 years to show how wrong I was! Thanks in advance, jerks!
 

Langway

In den Wolken
Jul 7, 2006
32,919
10,038
He looks eerily similar to Rick Nash with the puck -- the skating stride the long stick with the puck away from the body, the hands.
He's not as big but he's more physical than Nash and better defensively. Some of what's helped him is the Tkachuk effect. He's not as big as him either but the guy is a winner. The only limitation he may have is playmaking/vision a bit but teams love North/South goal-scorers that compete all over the ice and can mesh with skilled players.

I'd wager, based on an emphasis on character and competitiveness by GMs at 5/6/7, that there's less of a chance of Leonard making it to 8 than Michkov. He's got the intangibles...and also perhaps the ability to play center if teams really wanted to consider it.



A dark horse appears.
 

trick9

Registered User
Jun 2, 2013
12,544
5,685
If in the last page i mentioned how i wouldn't hate anyone of the realistic options we might pick at 8, Dmitri Simashev is that guy i would absolutely hate.

Nothing against him. He could end up being a solid defensive top-4 D. But he doesn't have half the offensive potential that Reinbacher has and defensively Reinbacher is at his level. His shot is poor and he doesn't have the vision to provide offense. 0 points in 18 KHL games and 10 points in 29 MHL games. Reinbacher had 22 points in 46 NL games in a similar level league as KHL. I don't think Reinbacher has elite offensive potential but it's several tiers above what Simashev can provide offensively.

I would be interested in Simashev if he kept sliding all the way to 40. I just don't think you should be drafting Brandon Carlo at 8th overall, even if you love that he's 6'4 and skates well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twabby

g00n

Retired Global Mod
Nov 22, 2007
31,213
15,764
He's not as big but he's more physical than Nash and better defensively. Some of what's helped him is the Tkachuk effect. He's not as big as him either but the guy is a winner. The only limitation he may have is playmaking/vision a bit but teams love North/South goal-scorers that compete all over the ice and can mesh with skilled players.

I'd wager, based on an emphasis on character and competitiveness by GMs at 5/6/7, that there's less of a chance of Leonard making it to 8 than Michkov. He's got the intangibles...and also perhaps the ability to play center if teams really wanted to consider it.



A dark horse appears.


I watched vid of Simashev and instantly thought "holy shit that's Orlov's replacement". Gave me the same vibe as when I first saw Orlov prospect footage. I'm guessing Caps brass might be thinking the same thing. If they go off the board at all, it might be for him.

I'm with others who are not sold on Reinbacher or Dvorsky and would have Simashev above them. But I've not seen enough video, possibly.

With Reinbacher I think there are possible skating and mobility concerns. Jeff Schultz 2.0?

Dvorsky strikes me as good but not "special" and might fall, possibly out of the top 10 unless there's a C panic.

Anyone else in that top 10 and I'll be happy.
 

Langway

In den Wolken
Jul 7, 2006
32,919
10,038
8. Washington Capitals: Dalibor Dvorsky, C, AIK (Allsvenskan) Most of my recent mock drafts have discussed Michkov to Washington. I do think that remains a real possibility. But if Michkov goes ahead of them, the other player I believe they are high on is Dvorsky. I’ve had some people in the league wonder whether Washington at eight or Detroit at nine would pick Dmitri Simashev.
Raw would be the key word with Simashev. But I think there's some offensive upside. Not a ton but he could be a monster either way. The production was poor this year but he did step it up a bit in the MHL playoffs. I don't doubt some team steps up ala Seider and values the frame, physicality and defensive tone-setting. 8 is a bit early but somewhere around 10-12 I think may happen. He's quite a bit bigger than Willander and significantly bigger than ASP.

We talk often about the Tkachuk effect but there's also a premium being placed on size/length on the blueline. Just look at all of the recent Cup winning bluelines. All very stout and hard to play against. Those teams also had responsible forwards and disciplined structure for overall team defense but the build of their bluelines were large.

Reinbacher's not a bad skater. He's not super nimble but he's comparable to Ekblad I think. Not quite as strong or physical but I don't think it holds him back. With Dvorsky it's mostly getting his skating up to par to be as impactful against men. You have to wonder a bit about his ceiling but his Alsvenskan team wasn't very good. I liked Kasper a bit more last year but I think he's clearly the best center that may be available to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandyHolt

twabby

Registered User
Mar 9, 2010
14,098
15,517
Michkov >>>>>>>> Benson > Reinbacher > Dvorsky > Leonard


Simashev shouldn't even be in the picture. That would be an awful pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Holtbyisms

Langway

In den Wolken
Jul 7, 2006
32,919
10,038


Seems entirely possible after the Newhook trade, particularly if they're primarily after Reinbacher. Decent chance he's there at 8.
 

LesDiablesRouges

Registered User
Feb 9, 2019
1,569
2,011


Seems entirely possible after the Newhook trade, particularly if they're primarily after Reinbacher. Decent chance he's there at 8.

If Michkov gets past San Jose and Montreal wants to trade down, no brainer for us, no? Give up 8, a high-end prospect, 40+?
 

twabby

Registered User
Mar 9, 2010
14,098
15,517
Some NHLe projection cards posted in spoilers below. I posted who I thought might be available to the Caps at 8.

Any other requests? I might have missed someone.

IMG_4521.jpeg
IMG_4527.jpeg
IMG_4525.jpeg
IMG_4523.jpeg
IMG_4529.jpeg
IMG_4533.jpeg
IMG_4531.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandyHolt

Misery74

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,521
2,485
If Michkov gets past San Jose and Montreal wants to trade down, no brainer for us, no? Give up 8, a high-end prospect, 40+?
Trading up in any capacity would require next years first, and our team is closer to a tank than competitive. We could end up drafting in the top 5 next year.

I certainly get the appeal, but Michkov seems like a luxury we cannot afford.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad