unicornpig
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2017
- 3,889
- 5,662
Are you serious? you have a kid who has had set back after set back, he finally has a good game and you bench him for almost the entirety of the game? if he's gonna get benched for any mistake how is he gonna expect to learn from the bench?Turcotte was the one that jumped over the boards early when Kopitar kicked the puck to get the too many men on the ice penalty
He leaps over the boards behind Kopitar as Kopitar was standing at the boards preparing to get off the ice
I have no idea if Kopitar knew he was going to do it or had done it or if the coaching staff really felt like a poor game management play made out of eagerness is worthy of being benched for the second half of the game.... BUT if people want an explanation for what Hiller meant I would assume that's what it was.
IF anyone was particularly inclined to go poking holes in that explanation... Grundstrom didn't play much more than Turcotte in that window yet wasn't "removed" from the game.
I think he was the player selected to sit in the box for both too many men penalties but was out for the first even strength shift after killing the penalty that started the 3rd.
So... I dunno maybe Hiller wanted to give Turcotte a tiny punishment for hopping over the boards early but by the time he even had a chance to keep him off the ice 40-50 minutes would have gone by and at that point he decided it wouldn't be fair for Turcotte to miss one regular shift and then try and get his legs going after not skating for close to an hour so he just shut it down?
Who knows? but more importantly who really cares?
It was a 4-0 win and the coach said Turcotte will be back against Buffalo and I know this is a bubble community where jokes and funny takes get repeated and slowly over time they coalesce into genuine conspiracy theories the generate strong emotional reactions to minor issues but this one in particular doesn't necessarily seem to fit the narrative.
To me anyway...