I must say, your attempts to defend/prop up Eakins cannot be dissuaded though they are wholly unconvincing. It is odd that you constantly want to bring up him and Murray when they are both gone.
In prior posts, you have suggested that the ducks improved play was due to roster turnover - that Eakins' poor record wasn't really a reflection of his (poor) coaching abilities. Yet you also want to give him credit for Cronin "inheriting" a team that didn't quit. How did Cronin inherit a team if there was such massive roster turnover? You need to pick an argument.
And for the record, I don't think the ducks quit last year. But that was in spite of (not due to) Eakins' coaching. He is a very nice guy but demonstrably a very bad NHL hockey head coach.
Let's focus on your post:
- HD says: last year's team didn't quit.
- @duckpuck says: "And for the record, I don't think the ducks quit last year."
So you're in complete agreement with "last year's team didn't quit." WTF is your malfunction?! Do you have serious cognitive dissonance?
=== Roster ===
Forwards here last year: Zegras, Terry, Rico, Mac, Strome, Vatrano, Silf, Carrick, Leason, Jones, Groulx, and Carrick. That's a total of 12 forwards out of 14-16 roster spots?. Groulx played 18 games in 2021-22 to start the season and then got a 2-game call-up last year.
Defensemen here last year: Fowler, Drysdale, and Vaaks. That's 3 out of 8 d-men. Fowler is our 1D and leader of the defense. In fact, those three were here two years ago and the team didn't quit then. LaCombe did get a couple of games last year, but that's just 2 games.
Apparently, that's a huge contingent returning. As for forward lines, our top line isn't producing like a top line, but the rest of our lines are churning, provided you do watch the games. Adding #2 pick overall in Carlsson does improve the first line when he's on the ice than when he's not on the ice. Yet, the team can still win without Carlsson in the lineup.
There is a difference between being on the roster and actually being healthy to play. Drysdale and Vaaks weren't on the roster long enough to make an impact last year, which is why they both were considered part of the influx of talent. Vaaks got injured in pre-season last year, returned to play 9 games, got injured, returned to play 14 games, and finally out of the season.
Our biggest influx of talent is on the blue line with two rookies (Mintyukov), two FA vets (Gudas, Lyubushking), and two returning talents from injuries (Drysdale and Vaaks)... sadly, Drysdale is back to being injured. Many of our defensive starters last year are in Europe or in the AHL this year. White (here last year) and Hagg (new FA vet) couldn't beat out the rookies LaCombe and Mintyukov.
Losing Drydale was detrimental last year, but losing Drysdale this year is not so detrimental because we have talent depth this year to make up for that loss.
=== Can a few players make a difference? ===
This is where history is important and why you have cognitive dissonance that a few players can make a difference.
2020-21: Finished with 2nd worst record. Lindholm and Manson were oft injured. Lindholm played in only 18 games and Manson played in 23 games.
Ducks | 2020-21 | Covid | Season | | | | |
---|
Game Set | GP | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | Point Share |
Total | 56 | 17 | 30 | 9 | 43 | | 0.384 |
2021-22: Everyone's healthy to start the season!
Ducks | 2021-22 | Splits | | | | | |
---|
Game Set | GP | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | Point Share |
Total | 82 | 31 | 37 | 14 | 76 | | 0.463 |
Gm 1 - 33 | 33 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 41 | | 0.621 |
Gm 34 - 62 (injuries started) | 29 | 10 | 16 | 3 | 23 | | 0.397 |
Gm 63 - 82 (TDL) | 20 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 12 | | 0.300 |
The team had an 8-game winning streak near the beginning of the season, once they shortened the been and kept the rookies (Drysdale, Zegras, and McTavish) off the ice at the end of close games.
The "injuries started" game set was when our defensive trio of Fowler, Lindholm, and Manson started to miss games due to injury. Lindholm missed 2 games, Fowler missed 4 games, and Manson missed 17 games (nearly 60% missed in the Game set 34-62). Relying on three rookies on the ice in Drysdale, Benoit, and Mahura was cringy. Anaheim had no depth.
At the TDL, we lost only three players: D Lindholm, D Manson, and LW Deslauriers. The team took another nosedive in the standings.
2022-23: Added only OFD's and fringe AHL d-men.
Ducks | 2022-23 | Splits | | | | |
---|
2022-23 | Games | W | L | OTL | Pts | Points % |
Game Set | 82 | 23 | 47 | 12 | 58 | 35.4% |
1 to 25 | 25 | 6 | 16 | 3 | 15 | 30.0% |
26 to 49 | 24 | 9 | 13 | 2 | 20 | 41.7% |
50 to 61 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 50.0% |
62 to 82 (TDL) | 21 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 11 | 26.2% |
Verbeek added to the blue line: Klingberg, Kulikov, White, and Beaulieu. At forward, Verbeek had a big splash with Strome and Vatrano. Adding injury to insult, Drysdale was lost to injury after playing in only 8 games. Drydale was our top-pairing RD with Fowler, iirc.
Surprisingly, the team was improving throughout the season, as denoted in the table above. We were winning too much that posters were complaining we were winning!
At the TDL, we lost two players to trades and one to IR. Rico went on IR before the TDL. Then we lost Klingberg and Kulikov. All we did was lose three players and our Points % was nearly cut in half!
Conclusion: Yes. A small contingent of players can vastly improve or vastly crater a team, especially when a team lacks talent depth.