Am I missing something about xG? Last year Frost had basically the same ES GF% as Cates, and was much higher than TK. But no one thinks it’s surprising that this year TK has a good xG with the team playing better, right?
There’s a difference bt GF and xGF. And Charlie loves to use this stat by Evolving Hockey called RAPM, regularly adjusted plus/minus. It attempts to place individual responsibility of certain metrics on players. Basically, how did the individual player affect a certain metric. They run it on xG, GF, CF.
Frost didn’t grade out particularly well with RAPM, which is what Charlie hangs his hat on. But that same website has another metric, GAR and xGAR. Frost grade it out extremely well for xGAR in ES offensive impacts, and pretty well in ES defensive impacts.
He had a good season last year, and Charlie doesn’t want to admit it because he’s never liked Frost.
^ That’s
@VladDrag ‘s cue.
My favorite part of that is that Charlie has used a four game sample to say Staal was playing well, and a one game sample to say Noah Cates was turning a corner… So…