Boston Bruins 2023-24 Roster and Salary Cap Discussion XI: Trade Deadline March 8th

Status
Not open for further replies.

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,477
19,020
Newton, MA.
I mean he did go get Backes. And Beleksey. Spent first rounders on lower upside guys like Frederic and Beecher (and got slammed for it!) in an effort to find more guys that could play that game. Sweeney brought in Accari. Kuraly. Hathaway. Lucic.

I think this theory that he “doesn’t get it” is complete horse shit. He literally spent two first round picks with Bergeron’s retirement around the corner on those kinds of guys instead of taking shots at trying to get a skilled top 6 C prospect.

You CANT win in the current league without skill. Full stop. You can’t. You have to secure that first and that has been the case for the last 10 years and even more so every year.

So if you are gonna find guys in your top 9 that are going to play a heavy game they also have to have enough skill. And those guys are a bitch to find and if you don’t home grow them you have to pay up the nose to get them.
Fair.

I never saw Balesky in that role, ps.

Other teams seems to be able to find size, physicality and a bit of skill. Somehow, the Bruins are unable to do so.

And when he tries, if he tries, Sweeney strikes out. That's the story. That's always been the story with this guy.

Why is that? Chiarelli did it. St Louis did it. To the Bruins, no less. The Rangers seem to be able to do it. The Flyers. Florida. Tampa Bay. Even the Canuck's.

You can make the case that Montreal is now more physical, and more intimidating, than the Boston Bruins.

Do you like the sound of that? Because that's the way it is.

I'm sick of Sweeney's sh*t. Heartily sick of it.

He blows. Apparently, Neely does as well.

Sons of Sinden.

They know how to lose.

And season tickets holders, they can enjoy their 10% increase.

For a first round flame out. Yet again.

And frankly, fool that I am, I care less about playoffs success or a Stanley Cup than I do about how my team plays.

How my Boston Bruins play.

What is valued by management? What matters?

I can't stand either of them, or the old man in Buffalo. If I could wave a wand and banish them from Causeway Street, I would.

With alacrity.
 
Last edited:

AngryMilkcrates

End of an Era
Jun 4, 2016
17,613
28,436
with all the talk about wanting to add size into the top 9, I'm a little shocked no one has brought up Anthony Mantha as a trade target. 18 goals 32 points on the year, 6'5" 235lbs, with excellent underlying numbers to boot. And he's doing that all in pretty limited minutes, so he could presumably do even better in a bigger role with better linemates here. Cap space would be an issue, but they could find a way to make it work somehow. Feels like the exact guy half the people here are begging for and no one is talking about him. And he beat the snot out of Dylan Cousins recently, which is a huge plus in my book.
I have not seen him play much this year. But my view of him as a player is not good. He tends to disappear for long stretches, can be a force and then vanish.
Currently over 20% shooting percentage for the year. Not gonna bet that does not regress.
I think if his contract were half of what it is there would be much less expectations:
1709343854104.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCB

TCB

Registered User
Dec 15, 2017
13,202
23,488
North Of The Border
I have not seen him play much this year. But my view of him as a player is not good. He tends to disappear for long stretches, can be a force and then vanish.
Currently over 20% shooting percentage for the year. Not gonna bet that does not regress.
I think if his contract were half of what it is there would be much less expectations:
View attachment 827853
Yep. Mantha is as strong as an ox and has a tremendous amount of skill but rarely uses either. When he does he can be dominate but he disappears where too often
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,370
22,315
Maine
1st of all making players available and actually trading them are different things.
It's never happened and it never will.

Except your post had the Bruins trading away 40 percent of the roster in favor of
playing their AHL team in the playoffs and labeling it as reality. Which is why I questioned it to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeIsAStud

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
26,464
23,240
Am I in the minority of people that don’t want to give up assets for Hanifin? If they want him wait until the off season. He isn’t making Us a cup contender this year

Not easy to answer. I guess it comes down to what you want the team to look like going forward.

I have to admit, that a top 4 of McAvoy, Lindholm, Carlo and Hanifin is very exciting….provided they add some muscle to the third pair.

If that’s what you want to see, and think it’s a step toward a cup, then why risk seeing him go somewhere else, where they have the advantage of negotiating months ahead of you and the 8th year?

If you’re not sold on that plan, then I agree with your perspective.
 

bruins19

Registered User
Aug 11, 2005
1,669
3,170
Trent Frederic was bad in that series. He looked like he didn't know what to do half the time.
This year’s version is a vast improvement. Likely he gets to 20 goals. Nobody, and I mean nobody, saw that coming.
 

Fenian24

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 14, 2010
11,050
15,518
Am I in the minority of people that don’t want to give up assets for Hanifin? If they want him wait until the off season. He isn’t making Us a cup contender this year
This team has a number of significant holes but a top 4 of McAvoy-Lindholm/Hanafin-Carlo should make them tough to beat, especially with Swayman and Ullmark in net. Add Middleton and a Lauzon type D as your third pair, that's a really, really good D.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,646
22,172
Tyler, TX
I don’t think they need that in his spot, which is 1LD or 2LD. I think they need someone like that at 3LD since Forbort sucks and Wotherspoon is probably not it. If Lohrei is 2LD then yeah a PK/physical guy is fine at 3LD but not someone who sucks and not someone who will cost a first.
Yeah I actually agree, sorry wasn’t clear what I meant by spot, meaning roster spot/lineup regular, not necessarily lineup spot- something I Lohrei might just be filling soon. And no, I have never been an advocate for a tough guy who sucks at everything else. McQuaid is my blueprint type for that role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bob77 and Gordoff

BlackFrancis

Athletic Supporter Patch Partner
Dec 14, 2013
6,184
9,873
Am I in the minority of people that don’t want to give up assets for Hanifin? If they want him wait until the off season. He isn’t making Us a cup contender this year
I think the bigger question is do we want the Bruins icing a $40m defense in the not so distant future? Maybe that isn't all that big a deal with the cap going up over the next handful of years, but the last cup winning Bruins squad had their #2D making half of their #1D's money. CapFriendly is an asshole for hiding the data, but I'd guess the 2-6 defensemen made close to Chara's cap hit, at least prior to picking up Kaberle.

Noah Hanifin will definitely have an impact if he's acquired. My question is, will he have a bigger impact than allocating that $6m - $7m into their forwards?
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,646
22,172
Tyler, TX
I think the bigger question is do we want the Bruins icing a $40m defense in the not so distant future? Maybe that isn't all that big a deal with the cap going up over the next handful of years, but the last cup winning Bruins squad had their #2D making half of their #1D's money. CapFriendly is an asshole for hiding the data, but I'd guess the 2-6 defensemen made close to Chara's cap hit, at least prior to picking up Kaberle.

Noah Hanifin will definitely have an impact if he's acquired. My question is, will he have a bigger impact than allocating that $6m - $7m into their forwards?
I say yes- with top flight goaltending that the Bruins have, they will be a force to be reckoned with against any team. I also believe there are enough goals to be had in the current lineup provided you don’t have 4-5 guys slumping at the same time like we currently do. That just doesn’t happen very often. And with that D and goaltending they won’t (you hope) need to count on 4 goals a game to win.
 

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,446
3,111
I think the bigger question is do we want the Bruins icing a $40m defense in the not so distant future? Maybe that isn't all that big a deal with the cap going up over the next handful of years, but the last cup winning Bruins squad had their #2D making half of their #1D's money. CapFriendly is an asshole for hiding the data, but I'd guess the 2-6 defensemen made close to Chara's cap hit, at least prior to picking up Kaberle.

Noah Hanifin will definitely have an impact if he's acquired. My question is, will he have a bigger impact than allocating that $6m - $7m into their forwards?
That’s my concern. We already have so much tied up in the d. I know Gryz is gone after this year but still. Our forward group needs a lot of work
 

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,477
19,020
Newton, MA.
Ok the “really 26-25” bit is a bit misleading.

Since that 11/4 date, they have 65 points. As does Colorado. Dallas and EDM have 67. The Canucks have 68. WPG with 69. Do all those teams suck, too?

Bruins are 6-13 in that time period in OT and shootout. If it was decided 5 on 5 like in the playoffs, where would they be? I don’t particularly care about the 3 on 3 and shoot out record.

I AM worried that they have the most blown leads after leading after 2. They have to figure out how to close out games.

I think the core issue there is how often they can’t break out of their own zone under pressure. Not having a guy that can win a key faceoff is part of it, too. And they could use some more asshole crease clearers. But if they could get out of their zone better, the other two bits become less important.

It’s why I am all in on Hanifin. He can move the puck like old Gryz, but also is big enough not to wilt under heavy pressure. It changes the dynamic of the team completely. They have had 7 OT losses since 11/4 when they were leading after two. Most in the NHL. If they just became the 4th worst team at that instead of the worst they would be tied with WPG for the 2nd best record in the league since 11/4.

But, even with that horrible failure in the teams game they are only 4 points back from the 2nd best record in the NHL since 11/4.

Saying they are a 500 team since 11/4 is a way to push a narrative, but not real.
I think it's fair to say they have played poorly of late. Wouldn't you?

Hanifin would be nice. They don't have enough, nearly enough, to bring him in this season. Perhaps next.

Master of the Obvious Says, after thinking about it recently,

I'm going to enjoy the rest of the season, whatever it brings.

In my view, it is a transitional year from which I expect little.

Fans I respect want in season moves. They want to trade for this that or the other.

They don't want to trade Ulllmark because they want to see the goaltending tandem in the playoffs, to see what that looks like, finally.

I get it.

But I have had an epiphany. And the epiphany is this: it's fun to speculate, and it's fun to anticipate the trade deadline/playoffs.

But it's not about what happens this season. It's about what happens going forward, and the team that will be built in the off season.

In that case, to me, it's about dealing Linus IF his value is greater now than in the offseason; dealing Jake; dealing two on the backend: dealing Lysell and Merkulov. Dealing for the future.

So, it occurs that all the talk is sound and fury, signifying nothing.

I'll enjoy what they are, if that is the word, the rest of the season.

And look forward. To a day that does not include current management, current ownership, and perhaps unfairly, current coaching.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad