I swear every loss is always on the refs. It’s never the bruins fault. Post season , regular season, doesn’t matter. The bruins didn’t lose because of how they played, they lost due to the refs or at least in part due to the refs!
Unreal Bruins fans have turned into Canucks fans in such a short amount of time.
Larry Robinson flat out said they targeted their smaller defensemen (then had three under 6 foot) and even took two suspensions. The funny thing about the series, when the Blues had their starting 20 they won 4 out of 5. Not having Miller and Grz IMO was the reason the Bruins lost.
Happened 50 minutes into the game and the Bruins had zero goals. That was probably the main issue with that gamgamethere
There are a number of reasons why the Bruins lost that series to St Louis ...
The slew foot that happened in game five that was not called - after 50+ years of watching Bruins hockey and all the other disappointments and missed calls throughout the years - that one non call robbed me of my joy for the game, not that one game alone, but the game of 'NHL' hockey battling for a championship. It changed the way I view and understand the game. I knew right there something wasn't right.
I use to live and breathe hockey, hockey was my passion I was obsessed with the game. That night I sat there staring at my TV in disbelief, there was no logical reason not to call a penalty. It was blatant - everyone saw it - including the referee. It almost appeared as though the ref knew he should call it, but knew he couldn't call it (and not because it wasn't a penalty).
I still watch hockey, follow along, still play mind games with coaching and GMing and what I might have done in such a situation with today's team or course of a game. But the emotional investment is gone. My passionate invested love for the game is gone.
For me, that non-call was the night hockey died.
Can someone please convince me that who ultimately wins is not heavily influenced by interests not always on the ice so as not to be obvious? Convince me that slew foot was not a penalty and that the referee truly didn't believe it was a penalty? Convince me that, that missed call, the blatant non-call did not dramatically alter the course of the game with time running out? Like many of you I can point out a hundred other reasons why Boston lost that series. And at this point it is what is. But for the life of me, I can not fathom one legitimate reason why that slew foot should not have been called.