We also don’t no any of the story with zegras…. Maybe the smoke is legit
Honestly I wouldn’t blame him and I think that’s on Cronin/Verbeek. The accountability double standard Zegras was given was shit. Pathetic display of leadership.
We also don’t no any of the story with zegras…. Maybe the smoke is legit
vegas trying to convince him to sign for cheap then moves him immediately after without letting him know.
I agree, and i wouldnt blame zegras either.Honestly I wouldn’t blame him and I think that’s on Cronin/Verbeek. The accountability double standard Zegras was given was shit. Pathetic display of leadership.
It really has been a disgrace how zegras has been treated here.Honestly I wouldn’t blame him and I think that’s on Cronin/Verbeek. The accountability double standard Zegras was given was shit. Pathetic display of leadership.
I'd do it but I have a hard time seeing CBJ do it.Kuemper for pld
Kinda makes
Gibson for laine seem like a possible fit
If they could somehow make Merzlikins disappear I could see them having interest. Though Gibson would also likely have to agree to a deal.I'd do it but I have a hard time seeing CBJ do it.
Gibson's probably the main obstacle. The guy will almost definitely want to be on a winning team.Kuemper for pld
Kinda makes
Gibson for laine seem like a possible fit
Another piece of fallout from that Dubois trade is now the Kings will likely be in the market for a scoring forward. Based on their current roster, they will most likely prioritize a righty (Lafferiere is the only righty they have under contract), which means they will be after some of the same players as us.
Tom Wilson? Washington going 2 for 2 lol.We’re the Kuemper side of this equation with Gibson, what other contracts are PLD level? Kotiemmi? Nurse? Contracts id rather not trade for.
I think Gibson stays for two more years and is traded in his final year.
He should have been traded years agoMoving Gibson at this point sucks. His value has never been lower and I really do think he will turn it around. Shame that it seems like it will be with a team that isn't us.
Don't even know enough about Detroit or Ottawa to think about who I'd want from them that you could get for Gibson, to be honest. Even at half his salary it's not like we're getting anyone premium.On The Jeff Marek Show today, they were talking about the goalie market and Friedman said:
“I’m gonna throw another name at you, and that’s John Gibson. I think there are some teams looking into Gibson.”
Added that New Jersey was one of those teams, he’s not sure about Ottawa being a fit, and the Ducks don’t want to retain salary. Also mentioned Detroit as a team he suspects to be in the goalie market.
Husso + breggren for gibsonDon't even know enough about Detroit or Ottawa to think about who I'd want from them that you could get for Gibson, to be honest. Even at half his salary it's not like we're getting anyone premium.
Not sure if Detroit would add to Husso if Gibson isn’t retained at all.Husso + breggren for gibson
Husso + 15 for gibson + bruins 2nd
/shrug
True… I don’t see the harm in retaining 1-2 mil tbhNot sure if Detroit would add to Husso if Gibson isn’t retained at all.
I don’t either (though it isn’t my money). I’ve always been a proponent of retaining 50% to squeeze out as much value as possible. You only get so many retention slots, might as well make the most of them.True… I don’t see the harm in retaining 1-2 mil tbh
It eliminates a retention spot for the next three years. That's a long time. Having flexibility at the TDL is important. Even if we start improving and competing for the playoffs it doesn't mean we won't end up in a spot where a trade or two could be helpful to the then current team.True… I don’t see the harm in retaining 1-2 mil tbh
We can’t before the draft right? So any trade involving #15 can’t involve retention from us.True… I don’t see the harm in retaining 1-2 mil tbh
It eliminates a retention spot for the next three years. That's a long time. Having flexibility at the TDL is important. Even if we start improving and competing for the playoffs it doesn't mean we won't end up in a spot where a trade or two could be helpful to the then current team.
This is why we dont want to retain. Losing 1/3 retention spots for 3 years can hurt the teams flexibility in future trades. The next 3 years are going to be critical for building us into a cup competitor.It eliminates a retention spot for the next three years. That's a long time. Having flexibility at the TDL is important. Even if we start improving and competing for the playoffs it doesn't mean we won't end up in a spot where a trade or two could be helpful to the then current team.
It really has been a disgrace how zegras has been treated here.
Could get a hatty in a game and still be benched for taking a penalty that is committed 3 other times by others
Not true…they’ll lead the team to the basement and being the west coast Sabres.What do you expect? It’s the blind leading the blind. Rookie GM and a rookie HC will lead this team to nowhere
It’s not ideal but probably wouldn’t hurt that much, you rarely need all three. They will probably only use one more regardless this year, two if they maybe have another Klingberg type pickup, and after that there’s no obvious candidates.This is why we dont want to retain. Losing 1/3 retention spots for 3 years can hurt the teams flexibility in future trades. The next 3 years are going to be critical for building us into a cup competitor.