Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,857
6,588
Why is Smirh on the 4th line? Are we intentionally stalling his development?
He's getting the Zetterlund/Eklund "young guy who needs a kick in the ass" treatment. If he starts the game well, he'll probably get more ice up the lineup. If he doesn't, he'll probably get scratched for "development" when Kostin is ready.
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
19,350
22,630
Vegass
Why is Smirh on the 4th line? Are we intentionally stalling his development?
Because he's largely been invisible save for the occasional nice cross-ice pass and bad turnover. I think the team has sort of given up on his development for now and are just letting him play hockey. A lot of times in our GDTs some will talk about Will having a dominant game and then i'll go to the opponent GDT and they'll be like, "I didn't even know he was playing!".
 

BaileyMacTavish

Hockey lovin' wolf
Nov 8, 2010
14,557
2,153
San Jose
Because he's largely been invisible save for the occasional nice cross-ice pass and bad turnover. I think the team has sort of given up on his development for now and are just letting him play hockey. A lot of times in our GDTs some will talk about Will having a dominant game and then i'll go to the opponent GDT and they'll be like, "I didn't even know he was playing!".
Oh that's... man... think we need Hagens?
 

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
1,310
2,065
He's 3rd line with Wennberg and Kunin.
Top line is the Lund line.

Eklund-Granlund-Zetterlund
Kovalenko-Celebrini-Toffoli
Goodrow-Wennberg-Kunin
Grundstrom-Sturm-Smith
Dellandrea-Kostin

Walman-Ceci
Ferraro-Liljegren
Thrun-Rutta
Vlasic-Mukhamadulin
I miss early season Granlund. I hope he gets back to that level soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,899
15,763
Folsom
He's 3rd line with Wennberg and Kunin.
Top line is the Lund line.

Eklund-Granlund-Zetterlund
Kovalenko-Celebrini-Toffoli
Goodrow-Wennberg-Kunin
Grundstrom-Sturm-Smith
Dellandrea-Kostin

Walman-Ceci
Ferraro-Liljegren
Thrun-Rutta
Vlasic-Mukhamadulin
Love the top six. Hate that 3rd line and think the 4th will play better than the 3rd. If Smith responds well which he's done before, he'll do well with Grundstrom and Sturm who both have been alright rather than awful in their shifts like Goodrow and Kunin tend to be when they're elevated in the lineup. They may want to consider scratching Ceci soon because it's been a bit rough even with the assist last night. I'd rather Mukhamadullin work out the kinks than scratch him if we're going to keep him up here.
 

LilLeeroy

Registered User
Dec 14, 2013
845
1,044
He's 3rd line with Wennberg and Kunin.
Top line is the Lund line.

Eklund-Granlund-Zetterlund
Kovalenko-Celebrini-Toffoli
Goodrow-Wennberg-Kunin
Grundstrom-Sturm-Smith
Dellandrea-Kostin

Walman-Ceci
Ferraro-Liljegren
Thrun-Rutta
Vlasic-Mukhamadulin
They keep going back to the Lund line despite the consistently terrible results. Of 219 lines combinations that have played at least 50 minutes together the Lund line is ranked 208 in xGoals%.
 

OverTheLine

Registered User
May 11, 2011
229
346
Smith played great hockey with Granlund, got injured, came back and was put with bums and subsequently struggled.

Goodrow has never shown anything resembling a justification for being put on the first line, but our young talent players are constantly being subjected to a farce of meritocracy that as far as I can tell does not seem to have worked at all. I generally like Wario so far but his handling of lineups has been suspect, especially with the youth vs vets. Smith should either be a top 6 player or out the lineup because he has no business playing on the fourth line; it’s not his role, not now nor will it ever be, and not only is he not going to learn anything useful that way developmentally, it’s a bad deployment of his skillset and wont contribute to winning games.
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
6,835
12,646
Venice, California
Smith played great hockey with Granlund, got injured, came back and was put with bums and subsequently struggled.

Goodrow has never shown anything resembling a justification for being put on the first line, but our young talent players are constantly being subjected to a farce of meritocracy that as far as I can tell does not seem to have worked at all. I generally like Wario so far but his handling of lineups has been suspect, especially with the youth vs vets. Smith should either be a top 6 player or out the lineup because he has no business playing on the fourth line; it’s not his role, not now nor will it ever be, and not only is he not going to learn anything useful that way developmentally, it’s a bad deployment of his skillset and wont contribute to winning games.

The way I see it is that Warsofsky sees the lines as having different jobs. The 4th line is chasing down pucks, playing simple and safe hockey, etc. He seems to like putting his young guys on that line when they’re struggling because — and this is just me guessing but I think it makes sense — he wants them to go out and not overthink, play simply, etc.

He GENERALLY moves that young guy up like a period into the game, so I wouldn’t worry too much about it. I expect the same to happen to Smith.
 

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
1,310
2,065
Smith played great hockey with Granlund, got injured, came back and was put with bums and subsequently struggled.

Goodrow has never shown anything resembling a justification for being put on the first line, but our young talent players are constantly being subjected to a farce of meritocracy that as far as I can tell does not seem to have worked at all. I generally like Wario so far but his handling of lineups has been suspect, especially with the youth vs vets. Smith should either be a top 6 player or out the lineup because he has no business playing on the fourth line; it’s not his role, not now nor will it ever be, and not only is he not going to learn anything useful that way developmentally, it’s a bad deployment of his skillset and wont contribute to winning games.
Near as I can tell, the bottom two lines are just this to Warsofsky.

shame-box.gif
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,857
6,588
The 4th line gets shifts immediately after PP and immediately after goals against. The obvious purpose is to get out there, play a hard shift, get possession, get the energy up, and set up the next line with either good game flow or an offensive face-off. This is not just a box of shame. I think @Jargon has it right. Play simple, responsible hockey, and if you can do that, you move back up the line up very quickly. Just like Eklund did, just like Zetts did, even though there was undue anger and panic about those decisions at the time.
 

wickedwitch

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
1,694
865
It's hard to evaluate the move completely without knowing what Warso is thinking. If he's expecting Smith to put up good offensive numbers there, then that's an unfair standard; if he's expecting solid hockey, then that's totally reasonable.

I've said this before (and will probably have to say this again): long-term, Smith needs to play with other skilled players. I wouldn't want to see him go months and months without that. His offensive game is the type that will develop best with other skilled players. But for a few days or weeks, it's fine to put him with "unskilled" players as long as there's a purpose to it.
 

timorous me

Gristled Veteran
Apr 14, 2010
2,477
4,186
"Offenseman" was better than this
It's also pretty insulting to a guy who just had a perfectly decent game on Thursday and, while he hasn't developed like we'd hoped, doesn't have a bad attitude and is trying to get better (and has mostly played this year with Rutta, whom others have struggled with as well).
 

Ad

Ad

Ad

Please disable your adblocker on HFBoards.com

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support us by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.