Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
25,620
7,116
ontario
Problem is with san jose he was over paid by 4 million and could only fit in the top 6 where he was not good enough for.

And he really isn't getting any less ice time then he did here.
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,093
20,827
Vegass
Problem is with san jose he was over paid by 4 million and could only fit in the top 6 where he was not good enough for.

And he really isn't getting any less ice time then he did here.
He isn’t but I would have been curious to know how War would have treated him and how a leash he would have had considering the leniency he has towards others.

Speaks to the complexity of team structures and opportunity and the variance in that from team to team.
We have structure?
 

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
25,620
7,116
ontario
He isn’t but I would have been curious to know how War would have treated him and how a leash he would have had considering the leniency he has towards others.


We have structure?
Considering with 2 GM's and 3 coaches, he was treated the same way here. I highly doubt a new coach that was part of the last coaching staff to bench him would change anything.
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,093
20,827
Vegass
Considering with 2 GM's and 3 coaches, he was treated the same way here. I highly doubt a new coach that was part of the last coaching staff to bench him would change anything.
He would have been painful to watch but I also think he would have been a better wing option for Smith than either Kunin or Goodrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

mogambomoroo

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 12, 2020
1,769
3,074
Edit:

Labanc didn't fit Sharks team last year and didn't fit the future, but I'm not totally surprised that change of scenery has helped him since this same scenario has happened a ton of times in NHL history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

jMoneyBrah

Registered User
Jan 10, 2013
1,239
1,871
South Bay
Labanc always had talent, just lacked consistent effort game to game. Feel he was checked out his last couple years here, glad he is off to a good start tho

I hope going unsigned through the UFA frenzy, the entire offseason, having to sign a PTO, getting dropped, and then a 1 year vet minimum deal on opening night motivates Labanc to make some adjustments to his game.

If he could consistently bring the intensity and consistently needed to just be a mid-tier bottom six guy defensively, he has the offensive chops to carve out some good years as a bottom six scorer. Guys with that profile, like a Lee Stempniak, stick around in the NHL.

Buttery soft bottom six scorers who are a complete liability in their own end and the coach’s automatic pick to serve team infractions don’t stick around too long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan and DG93

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,797
6,260
This is a hard forward group to manage. There are so many prospects coming down the pipeline that you don't want to bloat your books with overpaid forwards who are standing in their way...but at the same time, icing a very inexperienced roster is a recipe for disaster.

I feel like that's part of why Warsosfky is having issues with Smith.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DG93

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,105
12,877
California
This is a hard forward group to manage. There are so many prospects coming down the pipeline that you don't want to bloat your books with overpaid forwards who are standing in their way...but at the same time, icing a very inexperienced roster is a recipe for disaster.

I feel like that's part of why Warsosfky is having issues with Smith.
Or ya know Smith’s issues are from him not being quite NHL ready and having big unrealistic expectations from people who didn’t watch him in college. Anyone that watched him in college could tell you although he’s too good for the NCAA, he’s not NHL ready or at least not in an impactful way.
 

one2gamble

Registered User
Dec 24, 2007
17,509
8,814
Or ya know Smith’s issues are from him not being quite NHL ready and having big unrealistic expectations from people who didn’t watch him in college. Anyone that watched him in college could tell you although he’s too good for the NCAA, he’s not NHL ready or at least not in an impactful way.
So, shouldnt you put him with 2 of your better forwards instead of whatever it is they keep doing
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,105
12,877
California
So, shouldnt you put him with 2 of your better forwards instead of whatever it is they keep doing
So you put him with say Eklund and Toffoli (who I think are our 2 best wingers) suddenly he’s facing top competition in the NHL. Or at the very least second lines. Personally I say let him play against bottom sixers.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,742
8,005
So you put him with say Eklund and Toffoli (who I think are our 2 best wingers) suddenly he’s facing top competition in the NHL. Or at the very least second lines. Personally I say let him play against bottom sixers.
I think the upgrade in linemate quality would far outweigh the disadvantage of facing 2nd defense pairs instead of 3rd.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad