timorous me
Gristled Veteran
- Apr 14, 2010
- 2,334
- 3,886
I didn’t know that there were so many Sidney Crosbys floating around without jobs that Grier is apparently passing up.Tell me how many cups those guys were main pieces of.
Yep that’s my argument. It’s not that you need the top end guys to win cups and not a bunch of Boninos.I didn’t know that there were so many Sidney Crosbys floating around without jobs that Grier is apparently passing up.
Which is somewhat ironic because if the Sharks had even just a capable 3C in some of their better years, they might have a cup. You definitely don't need "a bunch" of Boninos, but time has shown you definitely need 1-2.Yep that’s my argument. It’s not that you need the top end guys to win cups and not a bunch of Boninos.
And we can get those in FA or the second round or the third.Which is somewhat ironic because if the Sharks had even just a capable 3C in some of their better years, they might have a cup. You definitely don't need "a bunch" of Boninos, but time has shown you definitely need 1-2.
Yet the possibility of finding one in September from the scrap heap pile is just… bad?And we can get those in FA or the second round or the third.
What are you even talking about? How does this relate to what I’m saying at all?Yet the possibility of finding one in September from the scrap heap pile is just… bad?
I would tread very carefully using this sort of language. It'd be very easy to interpret this as problematic.Well considering all those guys with exception to Smith careers are actually worse then Griers and are in fact trash. I’d say I’m not to far off, the sharks will be lucky if Smith pans out to be as good as David Legwand which isn’t a huge leap above peak Grier.
Grier is like the raccoon of NHL GM’s he’s happy picking up everyone else’s garbage and call it a treasure. So yes they are garbage tier Grier players
I gave Grier to much credit for some reason I thought he was closer to a 50 pint guy not 40 my bad
Eh. IMO, It was contextualized just fine. Anyone offended by that simile is looking for a reason to be offended.I would tread very carefully using this sort of language. It'd be very easy to interpret this as problematic.
Justin Bailey I think is the only new name here. Big forward that played on the Condors last year. He'd be a real good AHL get, basically exactly what that forward group needs.
Big you say? I am shocked. Shocked.Justin Bailey I think is the only new name here. Big forward that played on the Condors last year. He'd be a real good AHL get, basically exactly what that forward group needs.
Tanner Kaspick is also confirmed as an invite, Sheng mentioned he might be.
I don't think it was contextualized just fine. I think especially with their consistent criticisms of Grier since the beginning that it was just looking for an excuse to describe him as a raccoon...something that is problematic to say the least rather than looking for a reason to be offended.Eh. IMO, It was contextualized just fine. Anyone offended by that simile is looking for a reason to be offended.
Frankly, I’m more put off by the “picking up everyone else’s garbage and calling it treasure” - which seems to be mischaracterizing what’s happened and how Grier has spoken about these additions. I can’t recall any press conferences where Grier has effusively showered praise on any of the pickups. IIRC he’s essentially said “we like what X player brings in Y dimension. Hopefully he can make a place for himself in our future plans.” Which seems a long way off from “calling it treasure”.
I like splitting Thrun and Mukhamadullin if they can manage to make their respective pairs work.MY everything goes right projection for 2023-24 season:
Forwards:
Barabanov - Hertl - Duclair
Eklund- Couture - Zadina
Peterson - Granlund - Zetterlund
Kunin - Sturm - Hoffman
Defence:
Ferraro - Mukhamadullin
Thrun - Rutta
Knyzhov - Benning
Vlasic
Goalies:
Makaniemi
Kähkönen
Special Teams:
PP1: Hertl, Couture, Duclair, Eklund, Mukhamadullin
PP2: Granlund, Zadina, Barabanov, Hoffman, Knyzhov
PK1: Sturm, Zetterlund/Kunin, Thrun, Rutta
PK2: Couture, Eklund, Ferraro, Mukhamadullin
Optional PK3: Hertl, Zadina, Vlasic, Benning
Yeah, Knyzhov is better in every way compared to Vlasic at this stage in Vlasic career. Muk and Thrun are interchangeable up and down those pairings as we don’t have a clearl top pairing on D. I really hope that Blackwood can have a Renaissance in his career but for right now I’m going with the younger more talented guy in Makiniemi. Also, I don’t know exactly how likely this is but don’t sleep on Robins or Ozzy making this team in our bottom six potentially making 2 bottom six veteran wingers expendable.I like splitting Thrun and Mukhamadullin if they can manage to make their respective pairs work.
Also Vlasic as a 7th D is music to my ears, really sorry to say that. I feel like his veteran presence has negative value, since he hasn't had a good season in ages. That could change but likely doesn't.
Hopefully Mäkiniemi can become our 1A or 1B. I will give Blackwood a chance since he is probably much higher in depth chart for now.
I know Vlassic declined a lot from his peak but he did have a bounce back year last year. He was probably the second or third best defenseman last year behind EK and maybe Benning. Which is more a testament to how bad the D is.Yeah, Knyzhov is better in every way compared to Vlasic at this stage in Vlasic career. Muk and Thrun are interchangeable up and down those pairings as we don’t have a clearl top pairing on D. I really hope that Blackwood can have a Renaissance in his career but for right now I’m going with the younger more talented guy in Makiniemi. Also, I don’t know exactly how likely this is but don’t sleep on Robins or Ozzy making this team in our bottom six potentially making 2 bottom six veteran wingers expendable.
I don't think Vlasic bounced back, I think he got carried by Benning, which is an astoundingly sad sentence.I know Vlassic declined a lot from his peak but he did have a bounce back year last year. He was probably the second or third best defenseman last year behind EK and maybe Benning. Which is more a testament to how bad the D is.
He most certainly bounced back. His effectiveness was much better regardless of whom he paired with.I don't think Vlasic bounced back, I think he got carried by Benning, which is an astoundingly sad sentence.
The vast majority of his time this year was with Benning, who is a better puckmover than anyone save Karlsson on last year's team. Benning also took the physical role and allowed Vlasic more room. Last year, Vlasic was shifted among several partners - mostly Meloche, Simek, and Merkley, who I guess could make up a mediocre AHL defensive corps.He most certainly bounced back. His effectiveness was much better regardless of whom he paired with.