Speculation: - 2023-24-25-26 Sharks Roster Discussion | Page 1387 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: 2023-24-25-26 Sharks Roster Discussion

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.11 on Monday July 20, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
What can be done really? There’s no way they can cba them out of existence. A player should have some ability to protect themselves in their careers.
I mean they 100% could, it would be ugly and they won't but they have locked out the players before
 
I love the idea from Hodge, so I'm rolling with it. Going bold with offer sheet to Edvinsson, 8x$13M-15M AAV. Solid shot of no match from Detroit.

Giving 4 out of the next 5 first round picks is steep, but I can see Grier doing it if he has faith that since last season with a terrible D they only missed the playoffs by 4 points, that he believes that the Sharks will be a playoff team in at least 4 of the next 5 seasons, so for those years the 1st round pick will be likely 20 or lower. And that one year you miss and are lottery team you keep the pick.

Meanwhile, your long term D top 4 is

Edvinsson - Verhoeff
Dickinson - Lin

If Edvinsson keep developing as he has and Verhoeff hits, that's your Niedermeyer - Progner right there. A dynasty making move at what could very well only cost 4 firsts that are in the 20-30 OA range.
 
I love the idea from Hodge, so I'm rolling with it. Going bold with offer sheet to Edvinsson, 8x$13M-15M AAV. Solid shot of no match from Detroit.

Giving 4 out of the next 5 first round picks is steep, but I can see Grier doing it if he has faith that since last season with a terrible D they only missed the playoffs by 4 points, that he believes that the Sharks will be a playoff team in at least 4 of the next 5 seasons, so for those years the 1st round pick will be likely 20 or lower. And that one year you miss and are lottery team you keep the pick.

Meanwhile, your long term D top 4 is

Edvinsson - Verhoeff
Dickinson - Lin

If Edvinsson keep developing as he has and Verhoeff hits, that's your Niedermeyer - Progner right there. A dynasty making move at what could very well only cost 4 firsts that are in the 20-30 OA range.
Too much draft capital to give up with too many unknowns still on the roster. Simon may be good but those 4 firsts may ultimately get us the missing pieces.
 
What can be done really? There’s no way they can cba them out of existence. A player should have some ability to protect themselves in their careers.
I feel like there could be a limit to how many NMC/NTC a team could have on the books at any given time. Also could set limits to how many teams they can have on their do not trade list and also mandate that half of the options they will allow trade are in each conference so it doesn’t pigeon hole teams but does allow for some control
 
Too much draft capital to give up with too many unknowns still on the roster. Simon may be good but those 4 firsts may ultimately get us the missing pieces.

Firsts can be recouped other ways, just like how we saw trading Eklund got us an extra first.

(I'd of course rather trade for him first, but if that doesn't work, offer sheet him)
 
Last edited:
I mean they 100% could, it would be ugly and they won't but they have locked out the players before
I don’t see what the owners could offer for the players to accept that unless they give up the cap.
I feel like there could be a limit to how many NMC/NTC a team could have on the books at any given time. Also could set limits to how many teams they can have on their do not trade list and also mandate that half of the options they will allow trade are in each conference so it doesn’t pigeon hole teams but does allow for some control
They’d still have to get the players to agree to that in the cba which I don’t think the owners have the leverage to accomplish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CupfortheSharks
I love the idea from Hodge, so I'm rolling with it. Going bold with offer sheet to Edvinsson, 8x$13M-15M AAV. Solid shot of no match from Detroit.

Giving 4 out of the next 5 first round picks is steep, but I can see Grier doing it if he has faith that since last season with a terrible D they only missed the playoffs by 4 points, that he believes that the Sharks will be a playoff team in at least 4 of the next 5 seasons, so for those years the 1st round pick will be likely 20 or lower. And that one year you miss and are lottery team you keep the pick.

Meanwhile, your long term D top 4 is

Edvinsson - Verhoeff
Dickinson - Lin

If Edvinsson keep developing as he has and Verhoeff hits, that's your Niedermeyer - Progner right there. A dynasty making move at what could very well only cost 4 firsts that are in the 20-30 OA range.
Good. Thinking outside the box. I'm down. We need bold new thinking.
 
Mukh, Musty, 2nd? (Could be a protected first I suppose) Mg throws in 25 minutes of ufa negotiation time with Mario
Do it.
do-it-ben-stiller.gif
 
Hell of a lot more tolerable than Reilly or Nurse.
Exactly. Similar in age, more palatable contract, and most importantly an actual defensive guy. Nurse and Rielly have too much overlap with Dickinson’s and Verhoeff’s weaknesses. Pettersson would be an actual solid partner for Verhoeff. Defensive tilt, good size, simple game.
 
Mukh, Musty, 2nd? (Could be a protected first I suppose) Mg throws in 25 minutes of ufa negotiation time with Mario

Jim Nil laughs and then hangs up the phone. I don’t think a D+6 project defender who hasn’t established himself in the NHL, a project winger with so-so post draft performances, and a ‘28 2nd move the needle, and is easily beat by 20 other teams.
 
From Elliotte Friedman's thoughts and predictions that are Sharks related:

Darnell Nurse: Pittsburgh wanted Edmonton to take back a contract. The Oilers didn’t like whatever was presented to them. Philadelphia’s had a challenge putting all of the different pieces together in and out. Boston’s shown interest, but that’s also about what has to go out to make it work. I believe the Sharks are very interested, but Nurse remains east-focused as I write this.

Mason Marchment: There was a lot of interest. Montreal, I think Toronto. Someone made a great point that a sentimental favourite might be San Jose, longtime NHL home of his late father Bryan. The two were extremely close.

The defencemen: San Jose. Sharks need D. Ian Cole? Jamie Oleksiak? Jacob Trouba?

Rasmus Andersson: He’s staying.

Ryan Shea: Had a really good year. Heard Lightning really liked him. But they also have their eyes on Werenski and John Carlson, if he doesnt sign in Carolina. Good player.

 
I also wonder about Gavrikov. There was a rumor a few weeks ago that he was unhappy with the Rangers after they moved Panarin and speculation that he’d want to go back to the Kings. I wonder if Orlov could pitch him on SJ the way he tried to pitch Panarin on SJ.
Nope. Grier is not gunna chase a nearly 31 year old with 6 seasons left. Don't get me wrong, I like the player, but it just doesnt fit what grier is clearly doing.

He sees the timeline as I wrote earlier: He needs vet D for the next 2-3 years, as he buys time for the NHL forward kids+Dick+Pohlkamp+LSW to pro develop, and for Voerhoff and Lin to get ready to come into the league.

In 3-4 years, hopefully, he will have Dick on his long term deal taking a top 4 Spot. Hopefully Pohlkmap or LSW will be on their second contracts with a few years of NHL experience with hopefully one of them in a top 4 spot, or at least top 6. Voerhoff and Lin will be 21/22 years old and at least 1, maybe both, will be ready for a top 6 spot.

In other words, in about three years, the sharks should have 4 of the current kids in the NHL lineup. At that point, they may want to add 1 or 2 bona fide NHL stars (werenski types) in their late 20's.

The last thing Grier wants in 3 years is some old dude (34+) making 7M+ with still 3 more years to go. He might be open to a fourth year for a guy like Rielly or Nurse if that is all he can find. But, I think he prefers 2-3 years, and I would expect he will sign guys 2-3 years tomorrow (or begrudgingly offer a 4th year if absolutely necessary).
 
I still wanna see if Grier can pry Morrissey out of winterpeg. not sure what the price would be, but he is a perfect short term fit.

If a package of a 1st+3rd+ Cagnoni/Mukh+Bystedt can tempt them, I would do it in an instant. That's a very respectable haul for just 2 years of a 31 year old guy. He'd be a perfect short/mid term fit for the sharks to get that #1D, and the price should be much less than werenski.

I suppose WPG wants to get back into PO's this year, so maybe he's not on the market. Still, I like the fit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad